Dimensions of local public attitudes towards invasive species management in protected areas
Adriana E. S. Ford-Thompson A D , Carolyn Snell C , Glen Saunders B and Piran C. L. White A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
B Department of Primary Industries, Biosecurity NSW, 161 Kite Street, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
C Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
D Corresponding author. Email: adriana@cantab.net
Wildlife Research 42(1) 60-74 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14122
Submitted: 18 June 2014 Accepted: 23 March 2015 Published: 22 May 2015
Abstract
Context: Invasive species management is often a source of contention; therefore, understanding human dimensions is viewed increasingly as critical for management success.
Aims: Using invasive Javan rusa deer (Cervus timorensis) in the Royal National Park (RNP), Sydney, as a case study, we sought to identify key dimensions of local public attitudes towards deer and associated management interventions, to identify the most divisive issues, and to assess the influence of experiences on attitudes.
Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach, using a questionnaire targeted at residents closest to the border of the RNP (n = 406, 30% response rate). The potential for conflict index (PCI2) was used to analyse 32 framing statements, generated through in-depth interviews with 18 key stakeholders from a range of stakeholder groups (e.g. conservation, hunting, animal welfare). We also tested for significant differences in attitudes between those who had or had not experienced deer impacts or received information on deer management. We conducted qualitative analysis of open comments to identify emergent themes and develop an attitudes framework.
Key results: We identified three overarching dimensions to local attitudes, namely, stakeholder, wildlife and management dimensions, each consisting of key themes and issues, forming the attitudes framework. The most divisive issues based on PCI2 analysis related to deer remaining in the park (PCI2 = 0.626), the heritage value of deer (PCI2 = 0.626), the need to remove deer (PCI2 = 0.531) and the need to kill non-natives in national parks (PCI2 = 0.535). Experience of deer–vehicle collisions and property damage were associated with significantly more negative attitudes towards deer and non-native species and more trust in ecological evidence (P < 0.001), whereas positive experience of deer had the opposite effect (P < 0.001). These experiences were also associated with attitudes towards aerial shooting (P < 0.05) but not hunting. Receiving information improved trust in ecological evidence and decreased belief in heritage value of deer (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Attitudes of the local public were varied and complex; however, a mixed-methods bottom-up approach allowed us to identify specific key issues of divisiveness and make management recommendations.
Implications: The framework and analysis have the potential to facilitate conflict mitigation and develop invasive species management strategies that are inclusive of the local community.
Additional keywords: Australia, community, conceptual framework, deer, wildlife.
References
Akiba, H., Miller, C. A., and Matsuda, H. (2012). Factor influencing public preference for raccoon eradication plan in Kanagawa, Japan. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal 17, 207–219.| Factor influencing public preference for raccoon eradication plan in Kanagawa, Japan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006). ‘2006 Census of Population and Housing.’ Available at http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au. [Verified 15 April 2011]
Barry, J., and Proops, J. (1999). Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics 28, 337–345.
| Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bertolino, S., and Genovesi, P. (2003). Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia. Biological Conservation 109, 351–358.
| Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bremner, A., and Park, K. (2007). Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biological Conservation 139, 306–314.
| Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bryman, A. (2008). ‘Social Research Methods.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Chapple, R. (2005). The politics of feral horse management in Guy Fawkes River National Park, NSW. Australian Zoologist 33, 233–246.
| The politics of feral horse management in Guy Fawkes River National Park, NSW.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Decker, D. J., Riley, S. J., and Siemer, W. F. (Eds) (2012). ‘Human Dimensions in Wildlife Management.’ (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Dryzek, J. S., and Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive democratic theory. The American Political Science Review 87, 48–60.
| Reconstructive democratic theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
English, A. W. (2005). An evaluation of the status and management of wild deer in Australia in 2005. In ‘Proceedings of the National Feral Deer Workshop, Canberra, November 2005’. (Ed. S. McLeod.) pp. 106–111. (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra.)
Estévez, R. A., Anderson, C. B., Pizarro, J. C., and Burgman, M. A. (2015). Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conservation Biology 29, 19–30.
| Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25155068PubMed |
Ford-Thompson, A. E. S., Snell, C., Saunders, G., and White, P. C. L. (2012). Stakeholder participation in management of invasive vertebrates. Conservation Biology 26, 345–356.
| Stakeholder participation in management of invasive vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fraser, A. (2006). ‘Public Attitudes to Pest Control: a Literature Review.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.)
Fulton, D. C., Skerl, K., Shank, E. M., and Lime, D. W. (2004). Beliefs and attitudes towards lethal management of deer in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 1166–1176.
| Beliefs and attitudes towards lethal management of deer in Cuyahoga Valley National Park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., and Montes, C. (2008). Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biological Conservation 141, 2969–2983.
| Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hudson, J., Lowe, S., Oscroft, N., and Snell, C. (2007). Activating policy networks. Policy Studies 28, 55–70.
| Activating policy networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulme, P. E. (2009). Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 10–18.
| Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IBM Corporation (2013). ‘IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0.’ (IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY.)
Jackson, L. S. (2001). Contemporary public involvement: toward a strategic approach. Local Environment 6, 135–147.
| Contemporary public involvement: toward a strategic approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koichi, K., Cottrell, A., Sangha, K. K., and Gordon, I. J. (2013). What determines the acceptability of wildlife control methods? A case of feral pig management in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Australia. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: an International Journal 18, 97–108.
| What determines the acceptability of wildlife control methods? A case of feral pig management in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larson, D. L., Phillips-Mao, L., Ouiramb, G., Sharpe, L., Stark, R., Sugita, S., and Weiler, A. (2011). A framework for sustainable invasive species management: environmental, social and economic objectives. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 14–22.
| A framework for sustainable invasive species management: environmental, social and economic objectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20832931PubMed |
Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F., and Marchetti, M. P. (2007). ‘Invasion Ecology.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK.)
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. (2000). Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10, 689–710.
| Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Madden, F. (2004). Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9, 247–257.
| Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., and Teel, T. L. (2003). The potential for conflict index: A graphic approach to practical significance of human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8, 219–228.
| The potential for conflict index: A graphic approach to practical significance of human dimensions research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Margerum, R. D. (1999). Getting past yes. From creation to action. Journal of the American Planning Association 65, 181–192.
| Getting past yes. From creation to action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McNeely, J. A. (1994). Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity and Conservation 3, 390–405.
| Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moriarty, A. (2004a). The liberation, distribution, abundance and management of wild deer in Australia. Wildlife Research 31, 291–299.
| The liberation, distribution, abundance and management of wild deer in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moriarty, A. J. (2004b). Ecology and environmental impact of Javan rusa deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park. PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney, NSW.
Nesbitt, B. (2006). Feral horse management on conservation reserves in New South Wales. In ‘Proceedings of the National Feral Horse Management Workshop, Canberra, August 2006’. (Eds M. J. Dawson, C. Lane and G. Saunders.) pp. 34–37. (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra.)
Nimmo, D. G., and Miller, K. K. (2007). Ecological and human dimensions of management of feral horses in Australia: a review. Wildlife Research 34, 408–417.
| Ecological and human dimensions of management of feral horses in Australia: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2000). ‘Royal National Park, Heathcote National Park and Garawarra State Recreation Area Plan of Management.’ (NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service: Sydney.)
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2002). Draft deer management plan for Royal National Park and National Parks and Wildlife Service Reserves in the Sydney South region. Community consultation key issues report. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney.
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2005). Deer management plan 2002–2008 for Royal National Park and NPWS parks and reserves in the Sydney south region. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney.
Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J. L., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J., and Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters 3, 74–82.
| Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Philip, L. J., and Macmillan, D. (2003). ‘Public Perceptions of, and Attitudes towards, the Control of Wild Animal Species in Scotland.’ (University of Stirling: Stirling, UK)
Radeloff, V. C., Stewart, S. I., Hawbaker, T. J., Gimmi, U., Pidgeon, A. M., Flather, C. H., Hammer, R. B., and Helmers, D. P. (2010). Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 940–945.
| Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtV2is7c%3D&md5=e1702f5bd81fee8d3ac02dedee727227CAS |
Reed, M. (2008). Stakeholder participation in environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141, 2417–2431.
| Stakeholder participation in environmental management: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reiter, D. K., Brunson, M. W., and Schmidt, R. H. (1999). Public attitudes towards wildlife damage management and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 746–758.
Sharp, T., and Saunders, G. (2004). ‘DEE001 Ground Shooting of Feral Deer. Standard Operating Procedure.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Orange)
Sharp, R. L., Larson, L. R., and Green, G. T. (2011). Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biological Conservation 144, 2097–2104.
| Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharp, R. L., Larson, L. R., and Green, G. T. (2012). Comparing interpretive methods targeting invasive species management at Cumberland Island National Seashore. Journal of Interpretation Research 17, 23–43.
Shephard, C. (2002). A case study for managing controversial pest animals: rusa deer in Royal National Park. In ‘Proceedings of the Second NSW Pest Animal Control Conference: a Practical Pest Animal Management’. (Ed. S. Balogh.) pp. 56–58. (New South Wales Agriculture: Orange, NSW)
Stokes, K. E., O’Neill, K. P., Montgomery, W. I., Dick, J. T. A., Maggs, C. A., and Mcdonald, R. A. (2006). The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodiversity & Conservation 3, 489–512.
| The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stout, R. J., Stedman, R. C., Decker, D. J., and Knuth, B. A. (1993). Perceptions of risk form deer-related vehicle accidents: implications for public preferences for deer herd size. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21, 237–249.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). ‘Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.’ (Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA.)
Teel, T. L., and Manfredo, M. J. (2010). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 24, 128–139.
| Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19961511PubMed |
Tessema, M. E., Lilieholm, R. J., Ashenafi, Z. T., and Leader-Williams, N. (2010). Community attitudes toward wildlife and protected areas in Ethiopia. Society & Natural Resources 23, 489–506.
| Community attitudes toward wildlife and protected areas in Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaske, J. J., and Manfredo, M. J. (2012). Social psychological considerations in wildlife management. In ‘Human Dimensions in Wildlife Management’. (Eds D. J. Decker, S. J. Riley and W. F. Siemer.) pp. 43–57. (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD)
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., Barreto, H., and Shelby, L. B. (2010). An extension and further validation of the potential for conflict index. Leisure Sciences 32, 240–254.
| An extension and further validation of the potential for conflict index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, P. C. L., and Ward, A. I. (2010). Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human–wildlife conflicts. Wildlife Research 37, 623–629.
| Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human–wildlife conflicts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, P. C. L., Ford, A. E. S., Clout, M. N., Engeman, R., Roy, S., and Saunders, G. (2008). Alien invasive vertebrates in ecosystems: pattern, process and the social dimension. Wildlife Research 35, 171–179.
| Alien invasive vertebrates in ecosystems: pattern, process and the social dimension.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, P. C. L., Ford-Thompson, A. E. S., Snell, C. J., and Harris, S. (2011). Economic, environmental and social dimensions of alien vertebrate species in Britain. In ‘Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plants, Animal and Microbe Species’. 2nd edn. (Ed. D. Pimentel.) pp. 129–176. (CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL)
Wittemyer, G., Elsen, P., Bean, W. T., Coleman, A., Burton, O., and Brashares, J. S. (2008). Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 321, 123–126.
| Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXnvFeksb0%3D&md5=d2e0aa4c71e8a86f0695939253892858CAS | 18599788PubMed |
