The precautionary principle, uncertainty and the Noah’s Ark problem
Neil Perry
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
School of Business, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. Email: neil.perry@uws.edu.au
Wildlife Research 40(2) 117-125 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12070
Submitted: 5 April 2012 Accepted: 3 April 2013 Published: 3 May 2013
Abstract
Multiple biodiversity objectives have been proposed in conservation planning and economics for the Noah’s Ark problem – the problem of allocating limited funds to conservation projects – including species richness, persistence, taxonomic diversity, representativeness, the charismatic value of species, the broader concept of direct utility and ecological importance. However, these objectives are incommensurable and there is little consensus about which objective should be pursued, given the current state of nature. In economics, this is perhaps because the commensurability problem can be solved by converting all biodiversity objectives to monetary values. Yet, even here, a commensurability problem exists because fundamental uncertainty about species interactions means that ecological values cannot be represented in economic terms. Thus, maximising biodiversity value, combined as it is with a rational decision-making framework and assumed known probabilities of survival, can undermine the very values being pursued. This is especially the case when climate change is a current and future state of nature. Climate change adds additional complexity and fundamental uncertainties to the survival probabilities, the future value of species, the interactions among species and the probability of success of conservation projects. The associated incomplete information can lead decision makers to risky decisions under the current approach. Instead, under such conditions, the precautionary principle is appropriate. This leads to a broad conservation strategy of minimising the maximum regret and, when applied to the Noah’s Ark problem, an objective of ecosystem resilience or functional diversity rather than an objective based on economic values. The paper therefore provides an economic justification for focussing conservation resources and threatened species legislation on the resilience of ecosystems.
References
Aldred J. 2012Bargiacchi, R. (2003). Climate change scenarios and the precautionary principle. In ‘Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics’. (Eds J. Wesseler, H.-P. Wiekard and R. D. Weaver.) pp. 113–130. (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.)
Baumgärtner, S. (2007). The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services. Natural Resource Modeling 20, 87–127.
| The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baumol, W. J. (1977). ‘Economic Theory and Operations Analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)
Biodiversity and Climate Change Expert Advisory Group (2009). ‘Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change: Summary for Policy Makers.’ (Department of Climate Change, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.) Available at http://www.climatechange.gov.au/~/media/publications/biodiversity/biodiversity-summary-policy-makers.ashx [verified 11 September 2012].
Brock, W. A., and Xepapadeas, A. (2003). Valuing biodiversity from an economic perspective: a unified economic, ecological, and genetic approach. American Economic Review 93, 1597–1614.
| Valuing biodiversity from an economic perspective: a unified economic, ecological, and genetic approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bromley, D. W. (2004). Reconsidering environmental policy: prescriptive consequentialism and volitional pragmatism. Environmental and Resource Economics 28, 73–99.
| Reconsidering environmental policy: prescriptive consequentialism and volitional pragmatism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, G. M., and Goldstein, J. H. (1984). A model for valuing endangered species. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 303–309.
| A model for valuing endangered species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carroll, R., Augspurger, C., Dobson, A., Franklin, J., Orians, G., Reid, W., Tracey, R., Wilcove, D., and Wilson, J. (1996). Strengthening the use of science in achieving the goals of the endangered species act: an assessment by the ecological society of America. Ecological Applications 6, 1–11.
| Strengthening the use of science in achieving the goals of the endangered species act: an assessment by the ecological society of America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chan, K. M. A., Pringle, R. M., Ranganathan, J., Boggs, C. L., Chan, Y. L., Ehrlich, P. R., Haff, P. K., Heller, N. E., Al-Khafaji, K., and MacMynowski, D. P. (2007). When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology 21, 59–68.
| When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapin, F. S., Schulze, E.-D., and Mooney, H. A. (1992). Biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7, 107–108.
| Biodiversity and ecosystem processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chavas, J. P. (2009). On the productive value of biodiversity. Environmental and Resource Economics 42, 109–131.
| On the productive value of biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke, H. (2008). Classical decision rules and adaptation to climate change. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52, 487–504.
| Classical decision rules and adaptation to climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Collins, S. L., and Benning, T. L. (1996). Spatial and temporal patterns in functional diversity. In ‘Biodiversity: a Biology of Numbers and Difference’. (Ed. K. J. Gaston.) pp. 253–280. (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). (United Nations.) Available at http://www.biodiv.org/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf [verified 1 April 2012].
Cousins, S. H. (1991). Species diversity measurement: choosing the right index. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6, 190–192.
| Species diversity measurement: choosing the right index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Czajkowski, M., Buszko-Briggs, M., and Hanley, N. (2009). Valuing changes in forest biodiversity. Ecological Economics 68, 2910–2917.
| Valuing changes in forest biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Czech, B., and Krausman, P. R. (2001). ‘The Endangered Species Act: History, Conservation Biology, and Public Policy.’ (Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (2009). ‘The Australian Environment Act: Report of the Independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.’ (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.) Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/review/publications/pubs/final-report.pdf [verified 11 September 2012].
Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2011). ‘Australian Government Response to the Report of the Independent Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.’ (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.) Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/pubs/epbc-review-govt-response.pdf [verified 11 September 2011].
Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61, 1–10.
| Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Faith, D. P., Reid, C. A. M., and Hunter, J. (2004). Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment. Conservation Biology 18, 255–261.
| Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Folke, C. (2006). The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development. Conservation Biology 20, 686–688.
| The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16909555PubMed |
Gardiner, S. M. (2006). A core precautionary principle. Journal of Political Philosophy 14, 33–60.
| A core precautionary principle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hagerman, S. M., and Chan, K. M. A. (2009). Climate change and biodiversity conservation: impacts, adaptation strategies and future research directions. Biology Reports 1(16). Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920684/ [verified 11 September 2012].
Hector, A. (2001). Biodiversity and the functioning of grassland ecosystems: multi-site comparisons. In ‘The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions’. (Eds A. P. Kinzig, S. W. Pacala and D. Tilman.) pp. 71–95. (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)
Heller, N. E., and Zavaleta, E. S. (2009). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142, 14–32.
| Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hengeveld, R. (1996). Measuring ecological biodiversity. Biodiversity Letters 3, 58–65.
| Measuring ecological biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Setala, H., Symstad, A. J., Vandermeer, J., and Wardle, D. A. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75, 3–35.
| Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Janssen, R., and Munda, G. (1999). Multi-criteria methods for quantitative, qualitative and fuzzy evaluation problems. In ‘Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics’. (Ed. J. C. M van den Bergh.) pp. 837–852. (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.)
Joseph, L. N., Maloney, R. F., and Possingham, H. P. (2009). Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology 23, 328–338.
| Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19183202PubMed |
Keynes, J. M. (1921). ‘A Treatise on Probability.’ (Macmillan: London.)
Knight, F. H. (1921). ‘Risk, Uncertainty and Profit.’ (Houghton Mifflin: New York.)
MacDonald, H., McKenney, D. W., and Nealis, V. (1997). A bug is a bug is a bug: symbolic responses to contingent valuation questions about forest pest control programs? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 45, 145–163.
| A bug is a bug is a bug: symbolic responses to contingent valuation questions about forest pest control programs?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Margules, C. R., and Pressey, R. L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253.
| Systematic conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjsFyjsLg%3D&md5=0e8989034fc30cc0a5dd1f0d964aa3deCAS | 10821285PubMed |
Marsh, H., Dennis, A., Hines, H., Kutt, A., McDonald, K., Weber, E., Williams, S., and Winters, J. (2007). Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife. Conservation Biology 21, 387–399.
| Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17391189PubMed |
Martinez, N. D. (1996). Defining and measuring functional aspects of biodiversity. In ‘Biodiversity: a Biology of Numbers and Difference’. (Ed. K. J. Gaston.) pp. 114–148. (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)
Mawdsley, J. R., O’Malley, R., and And Ojima, D. S. (2009). A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 23, 1080–1089.
| A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19549219PubMed |
May, R. M. (1990). Taxonomy as destiny. Nature 347, 129–130.
| Taxonomy as destiny.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Metrick, A., and Weitzman, M. L. (1996). Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Economics 72, 1–16.
| Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Metrick, A., and Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 21–34.
| Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Wildlife Corridors Plan Advisory Group (2012). ‘Draft National Wildlife Corridors Plan.’ (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra) Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/wildlife-corridors/publications/pubs/draft-wildlife-corridors-plan.pdf [verified 11 September 2012].
Nicholson, E., and Possingham, H. P. (2006). Objectives for multi-species conservation planning. Conservation Biology 20, 871–881.
| Objectives for multi-species conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16909579PubMed |
Noack, F. A. W., Manthey, M., Ruitenbeek, J. H., and Marvie Mohadjer, M. R. (2010). Separate or mixed production of timber, livestock and biodiversity in the Caspian forest. Ecological Economics 70, 67–76.
| Separate or mixed production of timber, livestock and biodiversity in the Caspian forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nunes, P. A. L. D., and van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2001). Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense. Ecological Economics 39, 203–222.
| Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perry, N. (1999). Biodiversity preservation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 238–239.
Perry, N. (2010). The ecological importance of species and the Noah’s Ark problem. Ecological Economics 69, 478–485.
| The ecological importance of species and the Noah’s Ark problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Quiggin, J. (2005). The precautionary principle in environmental policy and the theory of choice under uncertainty. Murray Darling Program Working Paper M05#3. Available at http://www.uq.edu.au/rsmg/WP/WPM05_3.pdf [verified 11 September 2012].
Raffensperger, C., and Tickner, J. (eds) (1999). ‘Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Rawls, J. (1971). ‘A Theory of Justice.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Roth, T. P. (1999). Consequentialism, rights, and the new social welfare theory. Journal of Socio-Economics 28, 95–109.
| Consequentialism, rights, and the new social welfare theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sarkar, S. (2009). Conservation Biology. In ‘The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.’ Spring 2009 edn. (Ed. E. N. Zalta.) Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/conservation-biology/ [verified 1 April 2012].
Solow, A., Polasky, S., and Broadus, J. (1993). On the measurement of biological diversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 60–68.
| On the measurement of biological diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spangenberg, J. H. (2007). Biodiversity pressure and the driving forces behind. Ecological Economics 61, 146–158.
Tilman, D. (1997). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. In ‘Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems’. (Ed. G. C. Daily.) pp. 93–112. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Tilman, D., and Lehman, C. (2001). Biodiversity, composition, and ecosystem processes: theory and concepts. In ‘The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions’. (Eds A. P. Kinzig, S. W. Pacala and D. Tilman.) pp. 9–41. (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2004). Optimal climate policy is a utopia: from quantitative to qualitative cost-benefit analysis. Ecological Economics 48, 385–393.
| Optimal climate policy is a utopia: from quantitative to qualitative cost-benefit analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker, B. H. (1992). Biological diversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6, 18–23.
| Biological diversity and ecological redundancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weitzman, M. L. (1998). The Noah’s Ark problem. Econometrica 66, 1279–1298.
| The Noah’s Ark problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilber, C. K. (1999). Ethics and morality. In ‘Encyclopedia of Political Economy’. (Ed. P. A. O’Hara.) pp. 284–288. (Routledge: London.)
