Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR09023
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 36(7)

Urban cat (Felis catus) movement and predation activity associated with a wetland reserve in New Zealand

S. A. Morgan A , C. M. Hansen A , J. G. Ross A , G. J. Hickling B , S. C. Ogilvie A and A. M. Paterson A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Ecology, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Christchurch, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.

B The Center for Wildlife Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: adrian.paterson@lincoln.ac.nz

Wildlife Research 36(7) 574-580 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09023
Submitted: 27 February 2009  Accepted: 23 August 2009   Published: 28 October 2009

Abstract

Context. House cats are increasingly suggested as having major ecological impacts in semiurban environments. Information on the activity of house cats is relatively scarce, especially in habitats such as wetlands.

Aims. This study examines the movement and foraging behaviour of house cats living on the periphery of a wetland reserve in Christchurch city, New Zealand.

Methods. Twenty-one domestic cats living in a suburban residential area were studied using radiotelemetry to determine home-range size, mean and maximum distances travelled into the adjacent wetland, and the proportion of time spent in the wetland over a 12-month period. Surveys of prey retrieval for 88 cats were also carried out by cat owners over the same 12-month period.

Key results. Cat age and the distance of the cat’s home from the periphery of the wetland were highly correlated with cat movement and hunting activity. These movements were not markedly influenced by season or time of day. Younger cats (<6 years of age) living on the periphery of the wetland had larger home-range sizes, moved significantly further into the wetland and spent a significantly greater proportion of time in the wetland. Cats living close to the wetland also brought a greater diversity and a greater total number of prey items to their home-site. Rates of predation were not significantly influenced by sex or whether the cat was wearing a bell. The most common prey items were introduced rodents and birds; however, 172 of 981 prey items were identified as a native common skink.

Conclusions.Consequently, cats living in households on the wetland periphery currently pose a predation risk for the wetland species, and the impact of cats on the native skink population warrants further investigation.

Implications. This study suggests that domestic cats will exploit wild habitats but that their potential impact will have both positive (predation of introduced pest species) and negative (occasional direct predation) effects on native wildlife.


Acknowledgements

This research project was funded by the Department of Ecology, Lincoln University and the Christchurch City Council. There were many field assistants: Clare Washington, Kate McKeowen, Johnathan Banks, Andrew Win, Samantha Brown, Lucas Habib, Russell Bryant, Betta Pirodda, Diane Hassall, Stacey Fomison and Brian Penney (technical support). Several organisations contributed to supporting this study: Christchurch City Council, Landcare Research (especially Andrea Byrom), New Zealand Royal Society of Forest and Bird, Pegasus-Burwood Community Board, Travis Wetland Trust, New Zealand Department of Conservation, New Brighton Police, Southern Petware Ltd and Chequer Packaging. Thank you to the cat owners of Burwood.


References

Argante, J. (2008). Mad about cats. North and South 264, 60–67.
Bradshaw J. (1992). ‘The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK.)

Bradshaw, C. J. A. , Field, I. C. , Bowman, D. , Haynes, C. , and Brook, B. W. (2007). Current and future threats from non-indigenous animal species in northern Australia: a spotlight on World Heritage Area Kakadu National Park. Wildlife Research 34, 419–436.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Crossland A. (1996). Travis Wetland bird life inventory, analysis and restoration potential. Parks. Christchurch City Council, Christchurch.

Dickman, C. R. (2009). House cats as predators in the Australian environment: impacts and management. Human–Wildlife Conflicts 3, 41–48.
Fitzgerald B. M. (1988). Diet of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 123–150. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Fitzgerald B. M. , and Turner D. C. (2000). Hunting behaviour of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 151–175. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Freeman A. , and Freeman A. (1996). Survey of lizard fauna of Travis Wetland, Christchurch. Wildlife Report 9. Lincoln University, Lincoln.

Gillies C. (1998). Aspects of the ecology and management of small mammalian predators in northern New Zealand. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.

Gillies, C. , and Clout, M. (2003). The prey of domestic cats (Felis catus) in two suburbs of Auckland City. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 259, 309–315.
Kie G. , Baldwin J. , Evans C. (1994). Calhome – homerange analysis program. United States Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, CA.

King C. (1984) ‘Immigrant Killers – Introduced Predators and the Conservation of Birds in New Zealand.’ (Oxford University Press: Auckland.)

Lepczyk, C. A. , Mertig, A. G. , and Liu, J. G. (2004). Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biological Conservation 115, 191–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Liberg O. , Sandell M. , Pontier D. , and Natoli E. (2000). Density, spatial organisation and reproductive tatics in the domestic cat and other felids. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 119–147. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Lilith, M. , Calver, M. , Styles, I. , and Garkaklis, M. (2006). Protecting wildlife from predation by owned domestic cats: Application of a precautionary approach to the acceptability of proposed cat regulations. Austral Ecology 31, 176–189.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Macfarlane R. , Patrick B. , Johns P. , and Vink C. (1998). ‘Travis Marsh Invertebrate Inventory and Analysis.’ (Christchurch City Council: Christchurch.)

Matias, R. , and Catry, P. (2008). The diet of feral cats at New Island, Falkland Islands, and Impact on breeding seabirds. Polar Biology 31, 609–616.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Murphy E. C. , and Pickard C. (1990). House mouse. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 225–242. (Oxford University Press: Auckland.)

Nelson, S. H. , Evans, A. D. , and Bradbury, R. B. (2005). The efficacy of collar-mounted devices in reducing the rate of predation of wildlife by domestic cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94, 273–285.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Paton D. (1991). Loss of wildlife to domestic cats. In The Impact of Cats on Native Wildlife’. (Ed. C. Potter.) pp. 64–69. (ANPWS: Canberra.)

Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Samuel M. , and Fuller M. (1994). ‘Wildlife radiotelemetry.’ (US Fish and Wildlife Service: Bethesda, MD.)

Schmidt, P. M. , Lopez, R. R. , and Collier, B. A. (2007). Survival, fecundity, and movements of free-roaming cats. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 915–919.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Turner D. C. , and Meister O. (1988). Hunting behaviour of the domestic cat. In ‘The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 111–121. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Whitaker T. (1998). Striped skink (Oligosoma striatum) recovery plan 1998–2003. Threatened species recovery plan. Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Woods, M. , McDonald, R. A. , and Harris, S. (2003). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review 33, 174–188.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |