Genetics in conservation and wildlife management: a revolution since Caughley
Stephen D. Sarre A B and Arthur Georges AA Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: sarre@aerg.canberra.edu.au
Wildlife Research 36(1) 70-80 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08066
Submitted: 6 May 2008 Accepted: 24 October 2008 Published: 21 January 2009
Abstract
In his 1994 review of conservation biology, Graeme Caughley questioned the central role for genetics in that discipline. His central theme was that there was no known case of genetic malfunction leading to the extinction of a population or species, and that driving forces such as overkill, habitat fragmentation and introduced predators as well as environmental and demographic stochasticity of small populations should be considered ahead of genetics in the debate about extinction prevention. At the time, only indirect and theoretical evidence existed for genetic contributions to the declines of wildlife and most of the debate revolved around the impact of genetic variation on fitness and long-term persistence. In addition, the application of DNA technologies to the study of wildlife was in its infancy. Though this was not Caughley’s intention, many within wildlife management took his criticisms of genetic aspects of species decline as the cue to dismiss this branch of science as of minor relevance to conservation biology. Since Caughley’s critique, there has been a revolution in genetic technologies for non-model organisms with the arrival of highly informative hypervariable DNA markers. Perhaps even more importantly, developments in DNA and gene technologies have provided the opportunity to study fundamental life-history traits such as disease resistance in more direct ways than previously possible. In concert with these tools, conservation geneticists have risen to Caughley’s challenge and demonstrated unambiguously a clear role for genetic analysis in conservation biology. Despite these impressive advances, there remains an important gap between the genetic approaches available and their uptake by managers. Bridging this gap will greatly increase the capacity of wildlife managers to generate the data necessary for sound management.
Acknowledgements
We thank Jim Hone for the invitation to present this paper at the Fenner Symposium and Erika Alacs, Kate Hodges, Will Osborne, Tariq Ezaz and Dave Hunter for comments on the manuscript. We also thank two anonymous referees who made helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Alacs, E. A. , Hillyer, M. J. , Georges, A. , FitzSimmons, N. N. , and Hughes, J. M. (2008). Development of microsatellite markers in the Australasian snake-necked turtle Chelodina rugosa, and cross-species amplification. Molecular Ecology Resources ,In press.
Ardern, S. L. , and Lambert, D. M. (1997). Is the black robin in genetic peril? Molecular Ecology 6, 21–28.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Banks, S. C. , Hoyle, S. D. , Horsup, A. , Sunnucks, P. , and Taylor, A. C. (2003). Demographic monitoring of an entire species (the northern hairy-nosed wombat, Lasiorhinus krefftii) by genetic analysis of non-invasively collected material. Animal Conservation 6, 101–107.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellegren, H. (2000). Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences. Nature Genetics 24, 400–402.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Frankham, R. (1998). Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conservation Biology 12, 665–675.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Georges, A. , Adams, M. , and McCord, W. P. (2002). Electrophoretic delineation of species boundaries within the genus Chelodina (Testudines: Chelidae) of Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 134, 401–421.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hawkins, C. E. , Baars, C. , Hesterman, H. , Hocking, G. J. , and Jones, M. E., , et al. (2006). Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. Biological Conservation 131, 307–324.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seddon, J. M. , Parker, H. G. , Ostrander, E. A. , and Ellegren, H. (2005). SNPs in ecological and conservation studies: a test in the Scandinavian wolf population. Molecular Ecology 14, 503–511.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Spielman, D. , Brook, B. W. , and Frankham, R. (2004). Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 15261–15264.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Taberlet, P. , Griffin, S. , Goossens, B. , Questiau, S. , Manceau, V. , Escaravage, N. , Waits, L. P. , and Bouvet, J. (1996). Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 24, 3189–3194.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Vos, P. , Hogers, R. , Bleeker, M. , Reijans, M. , and Vandelee, T., , et al. (1995). AFLP– a new technique for DNA-fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23, 4407–4414.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Waters, J. M. , and Wallis, G. P. (2000). Across the Southern Alps by river capture? Freshwater fish phylogeography in South Island, New Zealand. Molecular Ecology 9, 1577–1582.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Weldon, C. , du Preez, L. H. , Hyatt, A. D. , Muller, R. , and Speare, R. (2004). Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10, 2100–2105.
| PubMed |
Woodhams, D. C. , Rollins-Smith, L. A. , Alford, R. A. , Simon, M. A. , and Harris, R. N. (2007a). Innate immune defenses of amphibian skin: antimicrobial peptides and more. Animal Conservation 10, 425–428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woodhams, D. C. , Vredenburg, V. T. , Simon, M. A. , Billheimer, D. , Shakhtour, B. , Shyr, Y. , Briggs, C. J. , Rollins-Smith, L. A. , and Harris, R. N. (2007b). Symbiotic bacteria contribute to innate immune defenses of the threatened mountain yellow-legged frog, Rana muscosa. Biological Conservation 138, 390–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woods, G. M. , Kreiss, A. , Belov, K. , Siddle, H. V. , Obendorf, D. L. , and Muller, H. K. (2007). The immune response of the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) and devil facial tumour disease. EcoHealth 4, 338–345.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yip, P. Y. , Chau, C. F. , Mak, C. Y. , and Kwan, H. S. (2007). DNA methods for identification of Chinese medicinal materials. Chinese Medicine 2((9)),Available online at
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Young, T. , and Harcourt, A. H. (1997). Viva Caughley! Conservation Biology 11, 831–832.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhu, D. , Degnan, S. , and Moritz, C. (1998). Evolutionary distinctiveness and status of the endangered Lake Eacham rainbowfish (Melanotaenia eachamensis). Conservation Biology 12, 80–93.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |