Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Changes in immunity to rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus, and in abundance and rates of increase of wild rabbits in Mackenzie Basin, New Zealand

John P. Parkes A C , Brent Glentworth B and Graham Sullivan B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.

B Environment Canterbury, PO Box 550, Timaru 7940, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: parkesj@landcareresearch.co.nz

Wildlife Research 35(8) 775-779 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08008
Submitted: 21 January 2008  Accepted: 27 August 2008   Published: 16 December 2008

Abstract

The evolutionary race between diseases and their hosts may lead to attenuation of the disease agent, increasing resistance in the host, or both. This is an undesirable outcome when the disease is being used as a biocontrol agent but a desired outcome when the host is valued by people. Introduced wild rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus are a pest to agriculture and biodiversity values in New Zealand’s grasslands, particularly on the drier eastern sides of both islands. The costs to manage them using conventional control could not be sustained by landowners who since the 1980s have proposed the introduction of the viral biocontrol agents myxomatosis and then rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV). Myxomatosis failed to establish but RHDV did establish and spread following its illegal introduction in 1997. However, since 1997, rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) has become less effective for biocontrol of rabbits in New Zealand. Three lines of evidence from our four study sites in the Mackenzie Basin support this claim. First, the proportion of rabbits of all ages with antibodies to RHDV has increased in samples of rabbits shot each year since 1997. Taken alone this may simply reflect an accumulation in cross-sectional samples of seropositive older rabbits that have been exposed to infection but survived successive epizootics. Second, the proportion of young rabbits, sampled at an age when they have been exposed to a single epizootic event, that have antibodies to RHDV has also increased since 1997. This is strong evidence that something has changed in the rabbit–virus interaction. The cause of this effect remains unknown but is reflected in the third line of evidence, that the abundance of rabbits as indexed by standardised spotlight counts has increased since 1997. The rate of increase has, however, been much slower than that seen in the same populations as they recovered from conventional control before the arrival of RHD. Thus, we conclude that RHD is still an effective biocontrol but its efficacy is waning.


Acknowledgements

We thank Guy Forrester for help with the analyses, and Grant Norbury for comments on drafts of the paper. We also thank the editors and referees for their advice and comments. Tao Zheng of AgResearch conducted the serological assays.


References

Barratt, B. I. P. , Ferguson, C. M. , Heath, A. C. G. , Evans, A. A. , and Logan, R. A. S. (1998). Can insects transmit rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus? Proceedings of the New Zealand Plant Protection Conference 51, 245–250.
Fenner F. , and Ratcliffe F. N. (1965). ‘Myxamatosis.’ (Cambridge University Press: London.)

Fraser, K. W. (1988). Reproductive biology of rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.), in central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 11, 79–88.
Munro R. K. , and Williams R. T. (1994). ‘Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease: Issues in Assessment for Biological Control.’ (Bureau of Resource Sciences: Canberra.)

Myers, K. , and Gilbert, N. (1968). Determination of age of wild rabbits in Australia. The Journal of Wildlife Management 32, 841–849.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Norbury G. , and Reddiex B. (2005). European rabbit. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.). pp. 131–150. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

O'Keefe, J. S. , Tempero, J. E. , Motha, M. X. J. , Hansen, M. F. , and Atkinson, P. H. (1999). Serology of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus in wild rabbits before and after release of the virus in New Zealand. Veterinary Microbiology 66, 29–40.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Reddiex B. (2004). Effects of predation and rabbit haemorrhagic disease on rabbit population dynamics in New Zealand. PhD Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand.

Robinson, A. J. , So, P. T. M. , Muller, W. J. , Cooke, B. D. , and Capucci, L. (2002). Statistical models for the effect of age and maternal antibodies on the development of rabbit haemorrhagic disease in Australian wild rabbits. Wildlife Research 29, 663–671.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sinclair A. R. E. (1995). Serengeti past and present. In ‘Serengeti II. Dynamics, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem’. (Eds A. R. E. Sinclair and P. Arcese.) pp. 3–30. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Thompson, J. , and Clark, G. (1997). Rabbit calicivirus disease now established in New Zealand. Surveillance 24(4), 5–6.


Trout, R. C. , Chasey, D. , and Sharp, G. (1997). Seroepidemiology of rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in the United Kingdom. Journal of Zoology 243, 846–853.


Villafuerte, R. , Calvete, C. , Gortazar, C. , and Moreno, S. (1994). First epizootic of rabbit hemorrhagic disease in free living populations of Oryctolagus cuniculus at Doñana National Park, Spain. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 30, 176–179.
CAS | PubMed |

Xu, Z. J. , and Chen, W. X. (1989). Viral haemorrhagic disease in rabbits: a review. Veterinary Research Communications 13, 205–212.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |