Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR07186
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 36(6)

Impacts on a threatened bird population of removals for translocation

David Bain A B and Kristine French A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Conservation Biology and Law, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Present address: Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd, PO Box 106, St Georges Basin, NSW 2540, Australia. Email: davidb@ecoaus.com.au

Wildlife Research 36(6) 516-521 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07186
Submitted: 7 December 2007  Accepted: 30 June 2009   Published: 29 September 2009

Abstract

The removal of individuals from a population may occur for several reasons and responses of populations will vary depending on the magnitude and nature of the removal and the life history of the species. An understanding of the effects of loss of individuals on these populations, and the mechanism of replacement, will be important to conservation. This may be particularly important where wild individuals are used for the increasingly popular conservation strategy of translocation. During the recent translocation of the endangered eastern bristlebird (Dasyornis brachypterus), two monitoring sites were established in the wild source population, one where removals were to take place and another as a control to assess the impact of the removals on the population. The removal of 44 eastern bristlebirds across 3 years from a single area in the source population had no significant detectable impact in the numbers of individuals surveyed. Individuals that were removed appeared to have been replaced within 6 months of their removal, although to a lesser extent in the later part of the study. The origin of the replacement eastern bristlebirds was unknown and the quick recovery was suggested to be a result of juvenile dispersal, perhaps combined with territory uptake by previously non-territorial and non-calling (thus undetectable) individuals within the population. Such a surplus may be a result of insufficient suitable habitat for population expansion, and will also have implications for monitoring populations of rare and cryptic species. It is also suggested that some territorial species may have several mechanisms that can replace losses of individuals from a population.


Acknowledgements

Ken Russell from the statistical consulting service at the University of Wollongong helped with the statistical analysis of the results. This research was carried out in accordance with animal ethics approval from the University of Wollongong (AE02/10) and scientific permits from the Department of Environment and Heritage, Booderee National Park and the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change. This work was supported by an ARC Australian Postgraduate Award – Industry scholarship with the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation as the industry partner.


References

Armstrong, D. P. , and Craig, J. L. (1995). Effects of familiarity on the outcome of translocations, I. A test using saddlebacks Philesturnus carunculatus rufusater. Biological Conservation 71, 133–141.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Burbidge A. H. (2003). Birds and fire in the Mediterranean climate of south-west Western Australia. In ‘Fire in Ecosystems of south-west Western Australia: Impacts and Management’. (Eds I. Abbott and N. Burrows.) pp. 321–347. (Backhuys Publisher: Leiden.)

Cederholm, G. , and Ekman, J. (1976). A removal experiment on crested tit Parus cristatus and willow tit Parus montanus in the breeding season. Ornis Scandinavica 7, 207–213.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Danks A. (1994). Noisy scrub-bird translocations: 1983–1992. In ‘Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna’. (Ed. M. Serena.) pp. 129–134. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Fischer, J. , and Lindenmayer, D. (2000). An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96, 1–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Friend J. A. , and Thomas N. D. (1994). Reintroduction and the numbat recovery program. In ‘Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna’. (Ed. M. Serena.) pp. 189–198. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Griffith, B. , Scott, J. M. , Carpenter, J. W. , and Reed, C. (1989). Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245, 477–480.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Higgins P. J. , and Peter J. M. (2002). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 6: Pardalotes to Shrike-thrushes.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Kleiman D. G. , Stanley Price M. R. , and Beck B. B. (1994). Criteria for reintroductions. In ‘Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals’. (Eds P. J. S. Olney, G. M. Mace and A. T. C. Feistner.) pp. 287–303. (Chapman & Hall: London.)

Knapton, R. W. , and Krebs, J. R. (1974). Settlement patterns, territory size, and breeding density in the Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia). Canadian Journal of Zoology 52, 1413–1420.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McCarthy M. A. (1994). Population viability analysis of the helmeted honeyeater: risk assessment of captive management and reintroduction. In ‘Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna’. (Ed. M. Serena.) pp. 21–25. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Mönkkönen, M. (1990). Removal of territory holders causes influx of small-sized intruders in passerine bird communities in northern Finland. Oikos 57, 281–288.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pickett M. (2002). Southern emu-wrens in Cox Scrub Conservation Park, South Australia. Reintroduction Specialist Group, Australasian Newsletter. April 2002. IUCN.

Sherry, T. W. , and Holmes, R. T. (1989). Age-specific social dominance affects habitat use by breeding American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): a removal experiment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25, 327–333.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zar J. H. (1984). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ 2nd edn. (Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)