Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR07077
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 35(4)

The influence of animal mobility on the assumption of uniform distances in aerial line-transect surveys

Rachel M. Fewster A E , Colin Southwell B , David L. Borchers C , Stephen T. Buckland C and Anthony R. Pople D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Statistics,University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.

B Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tas. 7050, Australia.

C CREEM, University of St Andrews, The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, St Andrews KY16 9 LZ, Scotland.

D Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, GPO Box 46, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: r.fewster@auckland.ac.nz

Wildlife Research 35(4) 275-288 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07077
Submitted: 29 June 2007  Accepted: 28 March 2008   Published: 27 June 2008

Abstract

Line-transect distance sampling is a widely used method for estimating animal density from aerial surveys. Analysis of line-transect distance data usually relies on a requirement that the statistical distribution of distances of animal groups from the transect line is uniform. We show that this requirement is satisfied by the survey design if all other assumptions of distance sampling hold, but it can be violated by consistent survey problems such as responsive movement of the animals towards or away from the observer. We hypothesise that problems with the uniform requirement are unlikely to be encountered for immobile taxa, but might become substantial for species of high mobility. We test evidence for non-uniformity using double-observer distance data from two aerial surveys of five species with a spectrum of mobility capabilities and tendencies. No clear evidence against uniformity was found for crabeater seals or emperor penguins on the pack-ice in East Antarctica, while minor non-uniformity consistent with responsive movement up to 30 m was found for Adelie penguins. Strong evidence of either non-uniformity or a failure of the capture–recapture validating method was found for eastern grey kangaroos and red kangaroos in Queensland.


Acknowledgements

We thank the observers, pilots, and support staff of both surveys. The East Antarctica survey was conducted under the Antarctic Pack Ice Seal program supported by the Australian Antarctic Division. The Queensland survey was supported by the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. We thank two referees and the editors for their detailed and constructive comments.


References

Borchers, D. L. , Zucchini, W. , and Fewster, R. M. (1998a). Mark–recapture models for line transect surveys. Biometrics 54, 1207–1220.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Buckland S. T., Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L. and Thomas L. (2001). ‘Introduction to Distance Sampling.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Buckland S. T., Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., and Thomas L. (Eds) (2004). ‘Advanced Distance Sampling.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Fewster R. M., and Buckland S. T. (2004). Assessment of distance sampling estimators. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 281–306. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Fewster, R. M. , and Pople, A. R. (2008). A comparison of mark–recapture distance sampling methods applied to aerial surveys of eastern grey kangaroos. Wildlife Research 35, 320–330.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fewster, R. M. , Laake, J. L. , and Buckland, S. T. (2005). Line transect sampling in small and large regions. Biometrics 61, 856–859.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Fewster, R. M. , Buckland, S. T. , Burnham, K. P. , Borchers, D. L. , Jupp, P. E. , Laake, J. L. , and Thomas, L. (2008). Estimating the encounter rate variance in distance sampling. Biometrics ,
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Melville, G. J. , and Welsh, A. H. (2001). Line transect sampling in small regions. Biometrics 57, 1130–1137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Southwell, C. (2005). Response behaviour of seals and penguins to helicopter surveys over the pack ice off East Antarctica. Antarctic Science 17, 328–334.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Southwell, C. , de la Mare, W. K. , Underwood, M. , Quatararo, F. , and Cope, K. (2002). An automated system to log and process distance sight–resight aerial survey data. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 394–404.


Southwell, C. , de la Mare, B. , Borchers, D. , and Burt, L. (2004). Shipboard line transect surveys of crabeater seal abundance in the pack-ice off East Antarctica: evaluation of assumptions. Marine Mammal Science 20, 602–620.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Southwell, C. , Borchers, D. , Paxton, C. G. M. , Burt, L. , and de la Mare, W. (2007). Estimation of detection probability in aerial surveys of Antarctic pack-ice seals. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 12, 41–54.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Southwell, C. , Paxton, C. G. M. , and Borchers, D. L. (2008). Detectability of penguins in aerial surveys over the pack-ice off East Antarctica. Wildlife Research 35, 349–357.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |