Temporal trends in use of fauna-friendly underpasses and overpasses
Amy R. Bond A and Darryl N. Jones B CA Applied Road Ecology Research, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
B Centre for Innovative Conservation Strategies, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: d.jones@griffith.edu.au
Wildlife Research 35(2) 103-112 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07027
Submitted: 5 March 2007 Accepted: 11 March 2008 Published: 21 April 2008
Abstract
The impact of roads on local biodiversity is a major issue associated with urbanisation. A major arterial road in the southern suburbs of Brisbane, south-east Queensland, was upgraded in 2004–05 from two to four lanes. In an attempt to minimise the impact of the larger road on local wildlife populations, a range of fauna crossing structures were constructed at the site. Monitoring of road-kill was undertaken for 4 months before construction and after the completion of construction. Assessment of the use of two underpasses and a large overpass (‘land-bridge’) started 6 months after construction using sand tracking in underpasses and scat sampling on the land-bridge. An initial 26-week period of intensive monitoring was undertaken from August 2005 to February 2006 followed by monthly monitoring from June 2006 to June 2007. On average, 1–5 tracks per day were detected in the underpasses at the start of the survey, increasing steadily to ~42 tracks per day by February 2006. The monthly survey showed regular use of the underpasses by a wide range of species and species-groups, the most abundant being ‘rodents’, most likely Rattus species, both native and introduced. The land-bridge was also used continuously by three species of macropod (red-necked wallaby, Macropus rufogriseus; swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor; and eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus) with brown hare (Lepus capensis) becoming increasingly common in summer 2006. The exclusion fencing was extremely effective in preventing most road-kill, at least of larger species, except following human-related breaches in the fence.
Acknowledgements
This project and the Compton Road Fauna Array would not exist but for the extraordinary efforts of many people but none more critical than Mary O’Hare (Brisbane City Council) and Thomas Creevy (Karawatha Protection Society). We sincerely thank Kristy Buchanan, Leigh Slater and Stacey McLean of Brisbane City Council for their support. Thanks are also due to Brendan Taylor for ongoing discussions and to Raymonde de Lathouder for assistance in the field. We also acknowledge the valuable suggestions of Camilla Myers, Andrea Taylor and two anonymous referees of an earlier draft of this paper.
Aars, J. , and Ims, R. A. (1999). The effect of habitat corridors on rates of transfer and interbreeding between vole demes. Ecology 80, 1648–1675..
Anon, (2006). Crossings for all creatures? Courier Mail, Brisbane 25(April), 60.
Clevenger, A. P. , and Waltho, N. (2000). Factors affecting the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. Conservation Biology 14, 47–56.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foster, M. L. , and Humphrey, S. R. (1995). Use of underpasses by Florida panthers and other wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 95–100.
Goosem, M. , Izumi, Y. , and Turton, S. (2001). Efforts to restore habitat connectivity for an upland tropical rainforest fauna: a trial of underpasses below roads. Ecological Management & Restoration 2, 196–202.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt, A. , Dickens, N. , and Whelan, R. J. (1987). Movement of mammals through tunnels under railway lines. Australian Zoologist 24, 89–93.
Laing, S. E. , Buckland, S. T. , Burn, R. W. , Lambie, D. , and Amphlett, A. (2003). Dung and nest surveys: estimating decay rates. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 1102–1111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mansergh, I. M. , and Scotts, D. J. (1989). Habitat continuity and social organization of the mountain pygmy-possum restored by tunnel. Journal of Wildlife Management 53, 701–707.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ng, S. J. , Dole, J. W. , Sauvajot, R. M. , Riley, S. P. D. , and Valone, T. J. (2004). Use of highway undercrossings by wildlife in southern California. Biological Conservation 115, 499–507.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor, B. D. , and Goldingay, R. L. (2003). Cutting the carnage: wildlife usage of road culverts in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 30, 529–537.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yanes, M. , Velasco, J. M. , and Sufirez, F. (1995). Permeability of roads and railways to vertebrates: the importance of culverts. Biological Conservation 71, 217–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |