Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR05029
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 33(1)

Accuracy and precision of grey-headed flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) flyout counts

David M. Forsyth A B , Michael P. Scroggie A and Eve McDonald-Madden A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

B CCorresponding author. Email: dave.forsyth@dse.vic.gov.au

C Current address: The Ecology Centre, School of Intergrative Biology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.

Wildlife Research 33(1) 57-65 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR05029
Submitted: 15 March 2005  Accepted: 9 January 2006   Published: 7 March 2006

Abstract

The principal method for estimating the abundance of bats in roosts is to count the number of bats exiting the roost at dusk (‘flyout counts’). We hypothesised that the accuracy and precision of flyout counts decrease non-linearly as the number of bats moving per unit of time increases, and that accuracy increases with observer experience. To test these hypotheses, we filmed grey-headed flying-foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus) exiting a roost in Melbourne on three consecutive evenings. The film was slowed and the number of flying-foxes flying-out in 30-s intervals was counted and assumed to be the true abundance. Thirteen other observers independently counted the number of flying-foxes flying-out in real time. We formulated our hypotheses into candidate models and compared support for these models using information-theoretic methods. Non-linear models had much greater support than linear models for all three flyouts. There was undercounting in two flyouts and overcounting in the third. There was good support for an effect of observer experience in one of the flyouts, but less support in the others. Precision declined as the true abundance increased in all three flyout counts. Our results indicate that accuracy, precision and observer effects vary with the dynamics of each flyout, and suggest that under some conditions flyout counts will often provide both inaccurate and imprecise estimates of abundance.


Acknowledgments

We thank the people who helped us to count flying-foxes: C. Allan, R. Barley, L. Bendall, R. Chick, L. Grgat, L. Lumsden, C. Murdoch, I. Temby, S. Toop, R. van der Ree, and A. Webster. I. Temby and R. van der Ree kindly provided background information about the Melbourne roost. J. Silins assisted with filming and L. Lumsden provided several useful references. Comments by T. Clancy, P. Eby, L. Lumsden, and an anonymous reviewer greatly improved this manuscript.


References

Anderson, D. R. (2001). The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1294–1297.
Burnham K. P., and Anderson D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Caley, P. , and Ottley, B. (1995). The effectiveness of hunting dogs for removing feral pigs. Wildlife Research 22, 147–154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Caughley G. (1977). ‘Analysis of Vertebrate Populations.’ (John Wiley: London.)

Eby, P. (1991). Seasonal movements of grey-headed flying-foxes Pteropus poliocephalus (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) from two maternity camps in northern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 18, 547–559.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gibbs J. P. (2000). Monitoring populations. In ‘Research Techniques in Animal Ecology’. (Eds L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller) pp. 213–252. (Columbia University Press: New York.)

Holling, C. S. (1959). Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomologist 91, 385–398.
Kalko E. K. V., Handley C. O., and Handley D. (1996). Organization, diversity, and long-term dynamics of a Neotropical bat community. In ‘Long-Term Studies of Vertebrate Communities’. (Eds M. L. Cody and J. A. Smallwood.) pp. 503–554. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

McDonald-Madden, E. , Schreiber, E. S. G. , Forsyth, D. M. , Choquenot, D. , and Clancy, T. F. (2005). Factors predicting grey-headed flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus: Pteropodidae) foraging in the Melbourne metropolitan area, Australia. Austral Ecology 30, 600–608.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pinheiro J. C., and Bates D. M. (2000). ‘Mixed-effects Models in S and S-Plus.’ (Springer: New York.)

Pollock, K. H. , and Kendall, W. L. (1987). Visibility bias in aerial surveys: a review of estimation procedures. Journal of Wildlife Management 51, 502–510.
R Development Core Team (2004). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.) http://www.R-project.org.

Sørenson, U. G. , and Halberg, K. (2001). Mammoth roost of nonbreeding straw-coloured fruit bat Eidolon helvum (Kerr, 1972) in Zambia. African Journal of Ecology 39, 213–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Thomas D. W., and LaVal R. K. (1988). Survey and census methods. In ‘Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats’. (Ed. T. H. Kunz.) pp. 77–89. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC.)

Thompson W. L., White G. C., and Gowan C. (1998). ‘Monitoring Vertebrate Populations.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

van der Ree, R. , McDonnell, M. J. , Temby, I. , Nelson, J. , and Whittingham, E. (2006). The establishment and dynamics of a recently established urban camp of Pteropus poliocephalus outside their geographic range. Journal of Zoology 268, 177–185.


Westcott, D. A. , and McKeown, A. (2004). Observer error in exit counts of flying-foxes (Pteropus spp.). Wildlife Research 31, 551–558.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |