Nutrient distribution and cycling along a forest chronosequence following the regreening of a mining and smelting degraded landscape

Patrick Levasseur; Nathan Basiliko; Shaun Watmough

Just Accepted

This article has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. It is in production and has not been edited, so may differ from the final published form.

Nutrient distribution and cycling along a forest chronosequence following the regreening of a mining and smelting degraded landscape

Patrick Levasseur , Nathan Basiliko, Shaun Watmough

Abstract

Context: The regreening (one-time application of soil amendments and tree planting) of mining and smelting degraded landscapes can increase site productivity and ecosystem nutrients in the short-term, but uncertainties exist regarding long-term nutrient status. Aims: This study investigated whether nutrient distribution and cycling change with stand age in regreened forests on a mining and smelting degraded landscape in the City of Greater Sudbury, Canada. Methods: We measured soil and vegetation nutrient concentrations (calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K)), nutrient resorption, litter decomposition, and N mineralization along a chronosequence of forested sites (n=12) that were regreened 15–40 years prior to sampling. Key results: As regreening stands aged, concentrations of Mg, K, and P increased in lower soil horizons, but foliar concentrations of nutrients did not change. The regreening sites were very rich in Ca and Mg but soils were poor in P, K, inorganic N, and N mineralization rates were very low. We found few relationships between nutrient cycling and stand age. Potassium and P are thought to be the limiting nutrients in the region and while resorption efficiency of K was much higher than expected, foliar N, P and K concentrations were comparable to “healthy” values. Conclusions: The lack of change in foliar nutrients and nutrient cycling with stand age suggest that nutrient limitation is not inhibiting forest function 40-years following a one-time regreening treatment. Implications: This study provides perspective to the long-term success of a one-time regreening on an immensely degraded industrial landscape.

SR24155 Accepted 13 March 2025