Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR23029
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 62(1)

Atterberg limits of baseball infield soils containing over-size particles, Part I: effect of particle size

Evan Christopher Mascitti https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0143-6100 A * , Andrew Scott McNitt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6840-1693 B and Patrick J. Drohan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-7108 A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Penn State University, 116 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16803, USA.

B Department of Plant Science, Penn State University, 116 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16803, USA.

* Correspondence to: evanmascitti@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Willis Gwenzi

Soil Research 62, SR23029 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR23029
Submitted: 8 February 2023  Accepted: 24 November 2023  Published: 11 January 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

The performance of baseball infield playing surfaces greatly depends on soil water content. Therefore, Atterberg limit tests may be useful when evaluating baseball infield soils because these tests directly link soil behaviour to water content. The tests’ utility for this application is limited by the standard practice of removing particles larger than 425 μm. Removing particles of 425–2000 μm makes it difficult to compare results for soils having different sand gradations because different amounts of sand are often removed. The implications of leaving particles of 425–2000 μm in the sample are not known.

Aims

This research was conducted to re-appraise the practice of removing ‘oversize’ particles prior to Atterberg limit testing and to clarify the oversize particles’ influence on the test results.

Methods

Six size grades of granular particles (termed ‘coarse additions’) corresponding to five individual size ranges of sand (2000–1000, 1000–500, 500–250, 250–150, and 150–53 μm) and silt (i.e. finer than 53 μm) were mixed with a kaolinitic clay at 0–80% coarse addition. The liquid limit (LL) and plastic limit (PL) were determined for each mixture.

Key results

The LL and PL decreased proportionally with sand or silt additions up to about 30% coarse content. Above 30%, particles finer than 425 μm produced greater deviations from the expected LL and PL than did the particles coarser than 425 μm, which would be prevented using current standard test methods.

Conclusions

Mixes containing these ‘oversize’ particles did not preclude the ability to complete the Casagrande cup or thread rolling tests, and in fact gave more predictable results than the currently-allowed particles, particularly those less than 250 μm in diameter.

Implications

This research suggests particles of 425–2000 μm can remain in soils during Atterberg limit tests. These findings may improve the utility of LL and PL tests for comparing baseball infield mixes.

Keywords: Atterberg, baseball, clay, infield, particle-size, plasticity, sand, soil, water content.

References

ASTM (2018) ‘D4318-17: standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils.’ (ASTM). doi:10.1520/D4318-17E01

ASTM (2019) ‘D2216-19: standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass.’ pp. 1–7. (ASTM International). doi:10.1520/D2216-19

Atterberg A (1911) Die Plastizität Der Tone. Intern Mitt Boden 1, 4-37.
| Google Scholar |

Atterberg A (1974) ‘Plasticity of clays.’ (Cold Regions Research Lab: Hanover, NJ, USA)

Barnes GE (2013) The plastic limit and workability of soils. PhD Dissertation. University of Manchester, UK. Available at https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/datastream?publicationPid=uk-ac-man-scw:212752&datastreamId=FULL-TEXT.PDF

Brady NC, Weil RC (2007) ‘The nature and properties of soils.’ (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA)

Casagrande A (1932) Research on the Atterberg limits of soils. Public Roads 13(8), 121-136.
| Google Scholar |

Casagrande A (1942) ‘Control of soils for military construction.’ (Harvard University: Cambridge, MA, USA)

Casagrande A (1947) Classification and identification of soils. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 113, 901-930.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dumbleton MJ, West G (1966) The influence of the coarse fraction on the plastic properties of clay soils. RRL report no. 36. Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, UK.

Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle-size analysis. In ‘Methods of soil analysis: part 4 physical methods’. (Eds JH Dane, GC Topp) pp. 255–293. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA)

Pettijohn FJ, Potter PE, Siever R (2012) ‘Sand and sandstone.’ (Springer Science & Business Media)

Puhalla J, Krans J, Goatley M (2003) ‘Baseball and softball fields: design, construction, renovation, and maintenance.’ (Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA)

R Core Team (2022) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.r-project.org/

Rehman HU, Pouladi N, Pulido-Moncada M, Arthur E (2020) Repeatability and agreement between methods for determining the Atterberg limits of fine-grained soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 84(1), 21-30.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schroder E (2012) Setting a realistic standard for infield mixes: opinions from the experts. SportsTurf, March 2012. Available at https://sportsturfonline.com/2012/03/14/setting-a-realistic-standard-for-infield-mixes-opinions-from-the-experts/4637/

Simonson RW (1999) Sources of particle-size limits for soil separates. Soil Horizons 40(2), 50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sivapullaiah PV, Sridharan A (1985) Liquid limit of soil mixtures. Geotechnical Testing Journal 8(3), 111-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

STMA (2002) Mix masters: experts share their secrets to establishing and maintaining a quality infield. SportsTurf, March 2002. Available at https://sturf.lib.msu.edu/article/2002mar14b.pdf

USGA (2018) Unites States Golf Association recommendations for a method of putting green construction. USGA.