Accounting for measurement errors when harmonising incongruent soil data − a case study
D. M. Crawford A , S. Norng B , M. Kitching B and N. Robinson
C D E
A Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.
B Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.
C Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Taylor Road, Epsom, Vic. 3551, Australia.
D School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Federation University, University Drive, Mt Helen, Vic. 3350, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: n.robinson@federation.edu.au
Soil Research 56(8) 793-800 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR17307
Submitted: 12 November 2017 Accepted: 21 August 2018 Published: 13 November 2018
Abstract
When collating soil data from different sources, the data should be congruent. Ordinary linear regression (OLR) has often been used to harmonise incongruent data. To do so, one of the sources is nominated as the reference and so is assumed to provide data that are determined without error despite evidence to the contrary. Alternative approaches that can handle errors in both variables, such as constructing a maximum likelihood functional relationship (MLFR), are seldom used. Two scenarios compared these two approaches using soil organic carbon data determined by the Walkley and Black method or the Dumas method. An inter-laboratory proficiency program provided data to represent an ideal scenario of complete information on precision, i.e. a mean and standard error of multiple determinations for each method as applied to each soil sample. In this scenario, it was found that the recovery of carbon was not consistent between laboratories or methods, nor was the precision of determinations consistent. Importantly, the precision data showed how neither method had an advantage and so could serve as a reference. Unfortunately, soil researchers are more likely to be trying to harmonise data from single determinations and have no data on the precision of either method. This second scenario was explored using legacy data and new data from re-analysis of 116 archived soil samples, with precision data from different external sources. Here the OLR regression coefficients were found to be much less accurate than those from using the MLFR harmonisation model.
We concluded from these scenarios, that MLFR should be used to harmonise incongruent data when data on measurement errors are available. MLFR gave different predicted values to OLR while accounting for measurement errors in both variables. Where sufficient information on precision is lacking, OLR yields similar results and so may be an easier but less rigorous option. However, more research is needed to establish when OLR can be used versus when MLFR should be used.
Additional keywords: soil organic carbon, Walkley-Black method, Dumas method, errors-in-both variables, MLFR.
References
Analytical Methods Committee (2002) Fitting a linear functional relationship to data with error on both variables. Technical brief. www.rsc.org/lap/rsccom/acm. Royal Society of ChemistryArrouays D, Marchant BP, Saby NPA, Meersmans J, Orton TG, Martin MP, Bellamy PH, Lark RM, Kibblewhite M (2012) Generic issues on broad-scale soil monitoring schemes: a review. Pedosphere 22, 456–469.
Chatterjee A, Lal R, Wielopolski L, Martin MZ, Ebinger MH (2009) Evaluation of different soil carbon determination methods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 28, 164–178.
| Evaluation of different soil carbon determination methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Colwell JD (1969) Auto-analyser procedure for organic carbon analysis of soil. National Soil Fertility Project Circular No. 5 (CSIRO, Sydney)
Colwell JD (1977) ‘National soil fertility project. Volume 1: objectives and procedures.’ (CSIRO, Canberra).
De Vos B, Lettens S, Muys B, Deckers JA (2007) Walkley-Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon: Recovery, limitations and uncertainty. Soil Use and Management 23, 221–229.
| Walkley-Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon: Recovery, limitations and uncertainty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heanes DL (1984) Determination of total organic-C in soils by an improved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 15, 1191–1213.
| Determination of total organic-C in soils by an improved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunter D, Williams S, Robinson N (2010) VSIS a new system for Victorian soil data. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World (Brisbane, Australia)
Johnston RM, Barry SJ, Bleys E, Bui EN, Moran CJ, Simon DAP, Carlile P, McKenzie NJ, Henderson BL, Chapman G, Imhof M, Maschmedt D, Howe D, Grose C, Schoknecht N, Powell B, Grundy M (2003) ASRIS: the database. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 1021–1036.
| ASRIS: the database.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnstone P, Shelley B (2000) ‘Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 1999.’ (Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Melbourne)
Johnstone P, Shelley B, Peverill KI (1999) ‘Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 1998.’ State Chemistry Laboratory, Werribee, Victoria (Australian Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Melbourne)
Johnstone P, Shelley B, Kitching M (2001) ‘Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2000.’ (Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Melbourne)
Johnstone P, Shelley B, Kitching M (2002) ‘Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2001.’ (Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Melbourne)
Johnstone P, Shelley B, Kitching M (2003) ‘Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2003.’ (Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Melbourne)
Karunaratne SB, Bishop TFA, Odeh IOA, Baldock JA, Marchant BP (2014) Estimating change in soil organic carbon using legacy data as the baseline: issues, approaches and lessons to learn. Soil Research 52, 349–365.
| Estimating change in soil organic carbon using legacy data as the baseline: issues, approaches and lessons to learn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lettens S, De Vos B, Quataert P, Van Wesemael B, Muys B, Van Orshoven J (2007) Variable carbon recovery of Walkley-Black analysis and implications for national soil organic carbon accounting. European Journal of Soil Science 58, 1244–1253.
| Variable carbon recovery of Walkley-Black analysis and implications for national soil organic carbon accounting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lowther JR, Smethurst PJ, Carlyle JC, Nambiar EKS (1990) Methods for determining organic carbon in podzolic sands. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 21, 457–470.
| Methods for determining organic carbon in podzolic sands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lyons DJ, Rayment GE, Peverill KI, Hill RJ, Daly BK, Ingram C, Marsh J (2008) ASPAC Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2005–06. Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc., Melbourne.
Lyons DJ, Rayment GE, Hill RJ, Daly BK, Marsh J, Ingram C (2010) ASPAC Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2006–07. Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc., Melbourne.
Lyons DJ, Rayment GE, Hill RJ, Daly BK, Marsh J, Ingram C (2011) ASPAC Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2007–08. Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc., Melbourne.
Meersmans J, Van Wesemael B, Van Molle M (2009) Determining soil organic carbon for agricultural soils: A comparison between the Walkley & Black and the dry combustion methods (north Belgium). Soil Use and Management 25, 346–353.
| Determining soil organic carbon for agricultural soils: A comparison between the Walkley & Black and the dry combustion methods (north Belgium).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Land and Water Resources Audit (2001a) ‘Australian Agriculture Assessment 2001 Vol. 1.’ (National Land and Water Resources Audit: Canberra)
National Land and Water Resources Audit (2001b) ‘Australian Agriculture Assessment 2001 Vol. 2.’ (National Land and Water Resources Audit: Canberra)
Navarro AF, Roig A, Cegarra J, Bernal MP (1993) Relationship between total organic carbon and oxidizable carbon in calcareous soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 24, 2203–2212.
| Relationship between total organic carbon and oxidizable carbon in calcareous soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peverill KI, Johnstone P (1997) ‘National Soil Quality Assurance Program Report 1997. State Chemsitry Laboratory, Werribee, Victoria.’ (Australian Soil and Plant Analysis Council: Melbourne)
Rayment G, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods-Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood Australia)
Rayment GE, Peverill KI, Hill RJ, Daly BK, Ingram C, Marsh J (2007) ‘ASPAC Soil Proficiency Testing Program Report 2004–05.’ (Australasian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc.: Melbourne)
Rayment GE, Hill R, Greaves A (2012) Using interlaboratory proficiency data to guide NIR/MIR calibrations. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43, 399–411.
| Using interlaboratory proficiency data to guide NIR/MIR calibrations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ripley BD, Thompson M (1987) Regression techniques for the detection of analytical bias. Analyst (London) 112, 377–383.
| Regression techniques for the detection of analytical bias.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sanderman J, Baldock J, Hawke B, Macdonald L, Massis-Puccini A, Szarvas S (2011) ‘National Soil Carbon Research Programme: Field and Laboratory Methodologies.’ (CSIRO Land and Water, Urrbrae, South Australia)
Skjemstad JO, Spouncer LR, Beech A (2000) Carbon conversion factors for historical soil carbon data. National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report No. 15. Translated by Australian Greenhouse Office, National Carbon Accounting System. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Australian Greenhouse Office.
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.
| An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wang XJ, Smethurst PJ, Herbert AM (1996) Relationships between three measures of organic matter or carbon in soils of eucalypt plantations in Tasmania. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 545–553.
| Relationships between three measures of organic matter or carbon in soils of eucalypt plantations in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webster R (1997) Regression and functional relations. European Journal of Soil Science 48, 557–566.
| Regression and functional relations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
