Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
REVIEW (Open Access)

Opportunities and constraints for biochar technology in Australian agriculture: looking beyond carbon sequestration

Balwant Singh A L , Lynne M. Macdonald B , Rai S. Kookana B , Lukas van Zwieten C , Greg Butler D , Stephen Joseph E F , Anthony Weatherley G , Bhawana B. Kaudal G , Andrew Regan H , Julie Cattle I , Feike Dijkstra A , Mark Boersma J , Stephen Kimber C , Alexander Keith A and Maryam Esfandbod K
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia.

B CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

C NSW Department of Primary Industries, 1243 Bruxner Highway, Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia.

D SANTFA, 190 Main North Road, Clare, SA 5453, Australia.

E Discipline of Chemistry, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

F School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

G Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

H BDM Resources, PO Box 507, Hamilton, NSW 2303, Australia.

I NSW Environment Protection Authority, PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232, Australia.

J Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, PB 3523, Burnie, Tas. 7320, Australia.

K Environmental Futures Research Institute and Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.

L Corresponding author. Email: balwant.singh@sydney.edu.au

Soil Research 52(8) 739-750 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14112
Submitted: 1 May 2014  Accepted: 25 August 2014   Published: 5 November 2014

Journal Compilation © CSIRO Publishing 2014 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

The application of biochar technology for soil amendment is largely based on evidence about soil fertility and crop productivity gains made in the Amazonian Black Earth (terra preta). However, the uncertainty of production gains at realistic application rates of biochars and lack of knowledge about other benefits and other concerns may have resulted in poor uptake of biochar technology in Australia so far. In this review, we identify important opportunities as well as challenges in the adoption of biochar technology for broadacre farming and other sectors in Australia. The paper highlights that for biochar technology to be cost-effective and successful, we need to look beyond carbon sequestration and explore other opportunities to value-add to biochar. Therefore, some emerging and novel applications of biochar are identified. We also suggest some priority research areas that need immediate attention in order to realise the full potential of biochar technology in agriculture and other sectors in Australia.

Additional keywords: biochar characterisation, contaminants, herbicide efficacy, heavy metals, nitrous oxide, plant growth media, regulations.


References

Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil 337, 1–18.
Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVWmtb3J&md5=41c67e956c94c52fbd96c13d98ae67e7CAS |

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Waste Account, Australia, Experimental Estimates. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at: www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4602.0.55.005

Barrow CJ (2012) Biochar: Potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Applied Geography 34, 21–28.
Biochar: Potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2011) A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution 159, 3269–3282.
A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXht12gsLzO&md5=b008187d02760d5876f959c5b9c78bf0CAS | 21855187PubMed |

Biederman LA, Harpole WF (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology–Bioenergy 5, 202–214.
Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmsVCrs70%3D&md5=5132ba33a03aa2cb23616c9619c1fb5aCAS |

Bird MI, Wurster CM, Silva PHP, Bass AM, de Nys R (2011) Algal biochar—production and properties. Bioresource Technology 102, 1886–1891.
Algal biochar—production and properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXitlWmsg%3D%3D&md5=925bc981a118c7dd3627738857d0dba6CAS | 20797850PubMed |

Bridle TR, Pritchard D (2004) Energy and nutrient recovery from sewage sludge via pyrolysis. Water Science and Technology 50, 169–175.

Cao XD, Ma LN, Gao B, Harris W (2009) Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environmental Science & Technology 43, 3285–3291.
Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsFKmtrw%3D&md5=e37ff6b0f9c6907354aca39e4e91ad8dCAS |

Cayuela ML, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Hanley K, Enders A, Lehmann J (2013) Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions? Scientific Reports 3, Art. No. 1732
Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cayuela ML, Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Jeffery S, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero MA (2014) Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 191, 5–16.
Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslClt7zJ&md5=fc434e880f04a4581a8b289c17feba53CAS |

Chai Y, Currie RJ, Davis JW, Wilken M, Martin GD, Fishman YN, Ghosh U (2012) Effectiveness of activated carbon and biochar in reducing the availability of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/dibenzofurans in soils. Environmental Science & Technology 46, 1035–1043.
Effectiveness of activated carbon and biochar in reducing the availability of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/dibenzofurans in soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhsFGqsrbF&md5=af7f0ea64f115b876d4c342743ab92bbCAS |

Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 629–634.
Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVamtbnM&md5=2f7ff6644ead0ea23c1d682c19723605CAS |

Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 437–444.
Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crane-Droesch A, Abiven S, Jeffery S, Torn MS (2013) Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis. Environmental Research Letters 8, 044049
Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Downie AE, Munroe P, Cowie A, Van Zwieten L, Lau D (2012) Biochar as a geo-engineering climate solution: Hazard identification and risk management. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 42, 225–250.
Biochar as a geo-engineering climate solution: Hazard identification and risk management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

EBC (2012) European Biochar Certificate—Guidelines for a sustainable production of biochar. European Biochar Foundation, Arbaz, Switzerland. Available at: www.european-biochar.org/en (accessed 1 December 2013)

Enders A, Lehmann J (2012) Comparison of wet-digestion and dry-ashing methods for total elemental analysis of biochar. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43, 1042–1052.
Comparison of wet-digestion and dry-ashing methods for total elemental analysis of biochar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xks1Wjtrk%3D&md5=459ec45478160e83489bd20eb0420e69CAS |

Farrell M, Khun T, Macdonald LM, Maddern TM, Murphy DV, Singh BP, Bauman K, Krull E, Baldock J (2013) Microbial utilisation of biochar-derived carbon. The Science of the Total Environment
Microbial utilisation of biochar-derived carbon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23623696PubMed |

Felber R, Leifeld J, Horák J, Neftel A (2014) Nitrous oxide emission reduction with greenwaste biochar: comparison of laboratory and field experiments. European Journal of Soil Science 65, 128–138.
Nitrous oxide emission reduction with greenwaste biochar: comparison of laboratory and field experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXnt1ensA%3D%3D&md5=88fc20b483105f512c6dc9cd363ca929CAS |

Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 51, 2061–2069.

Ghose MK, Kundu NK (2004) Deterioration of soil quality due to stockpiling in coal mining areas. The International Journal of Environmental Studies 61, 327–335.
Deterioration of soil quality due to stockpiling in coal mining areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmtlCntro%3D&md5=818ee7e7ca60ef134f59a5c1c01b4eebCAS |

Glaser B, Birk JJ (2012) State of the scientific knowledge on properties and genesis of Anthropogenic Dark Earths in Central Amazonia (terra preta de Índio). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 82, 39–51.
State of the scientific knowledge on properties and genesis of Anthropogenic Dark Earths in Central Amazonia (terra preta de Índio).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XjtFKmtL4%3D&md5=45b6a4d5558c8554f0c4279110c591abCAS |

Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical proper-ties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35, 219–230.
Ameliorating physical and chemical proper-ties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xkt1Wmsrc%3D&md5=d18ae5235ba5353425a5a810075f94c4CAS |

Gomez JD, Denef K, Stewart CE, Zheng J, Cotrufo MF (2014) Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. European Journal of Soil Science 65, 28–39.
Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXnt1ensg%3D%3D&md5=e0f7cefdb144c94e56cf3cba13fc82f8CAS |

Gomez-Eyles JL, Yupanqui C, Beckingham B, Riedel G, Gilmour C, Ghosh U (2013) Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury. Environmental Science & Technology 47, 13721–13729.
Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1ygtrrE&md5=910e0e69bbc75f5e0c2542a5d7981ffaCAS |

Graber ER, Harel YM, Kolton M, Cytryn E, Silber A, David DR, Tsechansky L, Borenshtein M, Elad Y (2010) Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant and Soil 337, 481–496.
Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVWmtb%2FJ&md5=af2242a6d741ffdbdb8cbfeb0586a19aCAS |

Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Gerstl Z, Lew B (2012) High surface area biochar negatively impacts herbicide efficacy. Plant and Soil 353, 95–106.
High surface area biochar negatively impacts herbicide efficacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XktFOntLs%3D&md5=05a571965cce73a0b4962a0a037d6c14CAS |

Hale SE, Lehmann J, Rutherford D, Zimmerman AR, Bachmann RT, Shitumbanuma V, O’Toole A, Sundqvist KL, Arp HP, Cornelissen G (2012) Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environmental Science & Technology 46, 2830–2838.
Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XitVSntLo%3D&md5=eae61bf75a05e7725669a3d3ac9aa8cfCAS |

Harel YM, Elad Y, David DR, Borenstein M, Shulchani R, Lew B, Graber ER (2012) Biochar mediates systemic response of strawberry to foliar fungal pathogens. Plant and Soil 357, 245–257.
Biochar mediates systemic response of strawberry to foliar fungal pathogens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harter J, Krause HM, Schuettler S, Ruser R, Fromme M, Scholten T, Kappler A, Behrens S (2013) Linking N2O emissions from biochar-amended soil to the structure and function of the N-cycling microbial community. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 8, 660–674.

Headlee WL, Brewer CE, Hall RB (2014) Biochar as a substitute for vermiculite in potting mix for hybrid poplar. Bioenergy Research 7, 120–131.
Biochar as a substitute for vermiculite in potting mix for hybrid poplar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXjsFyrs7g%3D&md5=bc20f3891e68cddbdfd34a27ff4b1e83CAS |

Hina K (2013) Applications of biochar for waste water treatment. PhD Thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 223–228.
Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtlSjtr7M&md5=8beb528b8528523d17c0651d2f6208b0CAS | 20870338PubMed |

Hwang IH, Nakajima D, Matsuto T, Sugimoto T (2008) Improving the quality of waste-derived char by removing ash. Waste Management 28, 424–434.
Improving the quality of waste-derived char by removing ash.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlyns7rO&md5=7a86e3b3ea0875a0372e63ff6ef0da04CAS | 17317141PubMed |

IBI (2012) IBI Biochar Standards. International Biochar Initiative. Available at: www.biochar-international.org/ (accessed 2 December 2013)

Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 144, 175–187.
A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, Bastos AC, Van Der Velde M (2013) The way forward in biochars research: targeting trade-offs between the potential wins. GCB Bioenergy 6, 176–179.
The way forward in biochars research: targeting trade-offs between the potential wins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jirka S, Tomlinson T (2014) 2013 State of the Biochar Industry—A survey of commercial activity in the biochar field. A report by the International Biochar Initiative. Available at: www.biochar-international.org/sites/default/files/State_of_the_Biochar_Industry_2013.pdf

Joseph S, Graber ER, Chia C, Munroe P, Donne S, Thomas T, Nielsen S, Marjo C, Rutlidge H, Pan GX, Fan X, Taylor P, Rawal A, Hook J (2013) Shifting paradigms on biochar: micro/nano-structures and soluble components are responsible for its plant-growth promoting ability. Carbon Management 4, 323–343.
Shifting paradigms on biochar: micro/nano-structures and soluble components are responsible for its plant-growth promoting ability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXptVajsL0%3D&md5=d0892d5ed84c4ed7e32b738aa0cafd59CAS |

Kameyama K, Miyamoto T, Shiono T (2014) Influence of biochar incorporation on TDR-based soil water content measurements. European Journal of Soil Science 65, 105–112.
Influence of biochar incorporation on TDR-based soil water content measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXnt1enuw%3D%3D&md5=755599457dad3ebb1a00260d7f760dd9CAS |

Kana JR, Teguia A, Mungfu BM, Tchoumboue J (2011) Growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with graded levels of charcoal from maize cob or seed of Canarium schweinfurthii Engl. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 51–56.
Growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with graded levels of charcoal from maize cob or seed of Canarium schweinfurthii Engl.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20652406PubMed |

Kim JS, Sparovek G, Longo RM, De Melo WJ, Crowley D (2007) Bacterial diversity of terra preta and pristine forest soil from the Western Amazon. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39, 684–690.
Bacterial diversity of terra preta and pristine forest soil from the Western Amazon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xht1KrsbnE&md5=6c294a5eac1f73171983709eb20a7fddCAS |

Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, Hamid R, Ottner F, Liedtke V, Schwanninger M, Gerzabek MH, Soja G (2012) Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: Effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 41, 990–1000.
Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: Effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtV2htrjP&md5=963bb2ab6cabc717d5476720a2449222CAS | 22751041PubMed |

Kono T (1956) Growing vandas in tree fern. American Orchid Society Bulletin 25, 254–259.

Kookana RS, Sarmah AK, Van Zwieten L, Krull E, Singh B (2011) Biochar application to soil: Agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. Advances in Agronomy 112, 103–143.
Biochar application to soil: Agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVynt77N&md5=33be4b6dec1d8ca8f7134c9994791e57CAS |

Krull ES, Macdonald L, Singh B, Singh BP, Fang Y, Cowie A, Cowie A, van Zwieten L, Murphy DV, Farrell M, Kookana R, Dandie C (2012) From Source to Sink: A National Initiative for Biochar Research. Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, ACT.

Kumar BM (2013) Mining waste contaminated lands: an uphill battle for improving crop productivity. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 1, 43–50.

Kwapinski W, Byrne CMP, Kryachko E, Wolfram P, Adley C, Leahy JJ, Novotny EH, Hayes MHB (2010) Biochar from biomass and waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization 1, 177–189.
Biochar from biomass and waste.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVSlt7nN&md5=a1a8f5e72e679c30b1d23a5e598fab71CAS |

Lehmann J (2007a) Bio-energy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5, 381–387.
Bio-energy in the black.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lehmann J (2007b) A handful of carbon. Nature 447, 143–144.
A handful of carbon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXltVGktbc%3D&md5=6359f475fb5db851dc73897a9967aa0fCAS | 17495905PubMed |

Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In ‘Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology’. (Eds J Lehmann, S Joseph) pp. 1–12. (International Biochar Initiative: Westerville, OH, USA)

Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11, 395–419.
Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macdonald LM, Farrell M, Van Zwieten L, Krull ES (2014) Plant growth responses to biochar addition: an Australian soils perspective. Biology and Fertility of Soils 50, 1035–1045.
Plant growth responses to biochar addition: an Australian soils perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXotFGgtL8%3D&md5=241ea31e24721ee6f42a8d3b34a4415bCAS |

Macías F, Camps-Arbestain M (2010) Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15, 511–529.
Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manikandan A, Subramanian KS (2013) Urea intercalated biochar—a slow release fertilizer production and characterisation. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 6, 5579–5584.

Martin SM, Kookana RS, Van Zwieten L, Krull E (2012) Marked changes in herbicide sorption–desorption upon ageing of biochars in soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 231, 7–78.

Mekuria W, Sengtaheuanghoung O, Hoanh CT, Noble A (2012) Economic contribution and the potential use of wood charcoal for soil restoration: a case study of village-based charcoal production in Central Laos. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 19, 415–425.
Economic contribution and the potential use of wood charcoal for soil restoration: a case study of village-based charcoal production in Central Laos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Méndez A, Gómez A, Paz-Ferreiro J, Gascó G (2012) Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil. Chemosphere 89, 1354–1359.
Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22732302PubMed |

Mitchell PJ, Dalley TSL, Helleur RJ (2013) Preliminary laboratory production and characterization of biochars from lignocellulosic municipal waste. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 99, 71–78.
Preliminary laboratory production and characterization of biochars from lignocellulosic municipal waste.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xhsleisb7J&md5=e1390dbd15dbe8be02cd4faee8f66b21CAS |

Moreno-de las Heras M, Nicolau JM, Espigares T (2008) Vegetation succession in reclaimed coal-mining slopes in a Mediterranean-dry environment. Ecological Engineering 34, 168–178.
Vegetation succession in reclaimed coal-mining slopes in a Mediterranean-dry environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nag SK, Kookana RS, Smith L, Krull E, Macdonald LM, Gill G (2011) Poor efficacy of herbicides in biochar-amended soils as affected by their chemistry and mode of action. Chemosphere 84, 1572–1577.
Poor efficacy of herbicides in biochar-amended soils as affected by their chemistry and mode of action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVGqu7zL&md5=9c0561d8257952951ad294241ed36756CAS | 21696801PubMed |

Namgay T, Singh B, Singh BP (2010) Influence of biochar application to soil on the availability of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to maize (Zea mays L.). Australian Journal of Soil Research 48, 638–647.
Influence of biochar application to soil on the availability of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to maize (Zea mays L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1Sru7nI&md5=294713fbb23322c0756809c4bbf1afd8CAS |

NEPM (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of site contamination) Measure 1999. National Environment Protection Council, Adelaide, S. Aust. Available at: www.scew.gov.au/nepms/assessment-site-contamination

Nielsen S, Minchin T, Kimber S, van Zwieten L, Gilbert J, Munroe P, Joseph S, Thomas T (2014) Comparative analysis of the microbial communities in agricultural soil amended with enhanced biochars or traditional fertilizers. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 191, 73–82.
Comparative analysis of the microbial communities in agricultural soil amended with enhanced biochars or traditional fertilizers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science 3, 195–206.

Qian L, Chen L, Joseph S, Pan G, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X, Zheng J, Yu X, Wang J (2014) Biochar compound fertilizer as an option to reach high productivity but low carbon intensity in rice agriculture of China. Carbon Management 5, 145–154.
Biochar compound fertilizer as an option to reach high productivity but low carbon intensity in rice agriculture of China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhs1SisLjJ&md5=f2f32e65fc43d461351dc0870476334aCAS |

Quin PR, Cowie AL, Flavel RJ, Macdonald LM, Morris SG, Singh BP, Young IM, Van Zwieten L (2014) Oil mallee biochar improves soil structural properties—a study with x-ray micro-CT. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 191, 142–149.
Oil mallee biochar improves soil structural properties—a study with x-ray micro-CT.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXlsF2ltro%3D&md5=02a93df88663ff5b889558af15fed96aCAS |

Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A (2010a) Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 39, 1224–1235.
Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXoslCqtLs%3D&md5=0f9738872e69cdbefce0db382dc61c93CAS | 20830910PubMed |

Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010b) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 48, 516–525.
Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1Sru7nJ&md5=9a65c574ef07410f7b85763220704954CAS |

Slavich PG, Sinclair K, Morris SH, Kimber SWL, Downie A, Van Zwieten L (2013) Contrasting effects of manure and green waste biochars on the properties of an acidic ferralsol and productivity of a subtropical pasture. Plant and Soil 366, 213–227.
Contrasting effects of manure and green waste biochars on the properties of an acidic ferralsol and productivity of a subtropical pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmtlCrsLg%3D&md5=04da5ac2d4e387d5a782112ac1151da3CAS |

Smider B, Singh B (2014) Agronomic performance of a high ash biochar in two contrasting soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 191, 99–107.
Agronomic performance of a high ash biochar in two contrasting soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXjtVSjsbo%3D&md5=ca80f7b99632c1b18717e1010289844eCAS |

Sohi SP (2012) Carbon storage with benefits. Science 338, 1034–1035.
Carbon storage with benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVCjtbnP&md5=06a8c2ab2d30ea2ae110dda054b99872CAS | 23180849PubMed |

Sombroek WG (1966) ‘Amazon soils: A reconnaissance of the soils of the Brazilian Amazon region.’ Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen. (Centre for Agricultural Publications and Documentation: Wageningen, the Netherlands)

Strohmayer P (1999) Soil stockpiling for reclamation and restoration activities after mining and construction. Restoration and Reclamation Review 4, 1–6.

Tacey WH, Glossop BL (1980) Assessment of topsoil handling techniques for rehabilitation of sites mined for bauxite within the jarrah forest of Western Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 17, 195–201.
Assessment of topsoil handling techniques for rehabilitation of sites mined for bauxite within the jarrah forest of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Takagi K, Yoshida Y (2003) In situ bioremediation of herbicides simazine-polluted soils in a golf course using degrading bacteria enriched charcoal. In ‘Proceedings International Workshop on Material Circulation through Agro Ecosystems in East Asia and Assessment of its Environmental Impact’. Tsukuba, Japan. pp. 58–60. (National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences: Tsukuba, Japan)

Tian Y, Sun X, Li S, Wang H, Wang L, Cao J, Zhang L (2012) Biochar made from green waste as a peat substitute in growth media for Calathea rotundifola cv. Fasciata. Scientia Horticulturae 143, 15–18.
Biochar made from green waste as a peat substitute in growth media for Calathea rotundifola cv. Fasciata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Toth J, Milham PJ (1975) Activated carbon and ash-carbon effects on adsorption and phytotoxicity of diuron. Weed Research 15, 171–176.
Activated carbon and ash-carbon effects on adsorption and phytotoxicity of diuron.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE2MXkvFahtbs%3D&md5=55d8eb9426a908ba281130b8dc2e918fCAS |

Toth J, Milham PJ, Raison JM (1981) Ash from rice stubble inactivates thiobencarb and molinate. Weed Research 21, 113–117.
Ash from rice stubble inactivates thiobencarb and molinate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3MXlvFyqsbw%3D&md5=53abf52fae1a5dc60d326e17c22cc563CAS |

Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Klasson T, Wartelle LH (2010) Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendment: roles of natural organic matter. Chemosphere 80, 935–940.
Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendment: roles of natural organic matter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXptVCns78%3D&md5=623f8a3079a2cb2edf5fc24566f2c199CAS | 20542314PubMed |

Van DTT, Mui NT, Ledin I (2006) Effect of method of processing foliage of Acacia mangium and inclusion of bamboo charcoal in the diet on performance of growing goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 130, 242–256.
Effect of method of processing foliage of Acacia mangium and inclusion of bamboo charcoal in the diet on performance of growing goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Zwieten L, Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Chan KY (2009) Biochar and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In ‘Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology’. (Eds J Lehmann, S Joseph) pp. 227–249. (Earthscan: London)

Van Zwieten L, Kimber SW, Morris SG, Singh BP, Grace P, Scheer C, Rust J, Downie A, Cowie A (2013) Pyrolysing poultry litter reduces N2O and CO2 flux. The Science of the Total Environment 465, 279–287.
Pyrolysing poultry litter reduces N2O and CO2 flux.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXktFChsro%3D&md5=2992630a5ca2e94f9180ce3007d77c4fCAS | 23507564PubMed |

Van Zwieten L, Singh B-P, Kimber SWL, Murphy DV, MacDonald L, Rust J, Morris S (2014) An incubation study investigating mechanisms that impact N2O flux from soil following biochar application. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 191, 53–62.
An incubation study investigating mechanisms that impact N2O flux from soil following biochar application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXkvFSitbc%3D&md5=7e14e824c9d0fe510bd5676b336dcd7bCAS |

Vinh NC, Hien NV, Anh MTL, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2014) Biochar treatment and its effects on rice and vegetable yields in mountainous areas of northern Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural and Soil Science 2, 5–13.

Wang T, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M, Bishop P (2012) Chemical and bioassay characterisation of nitrogen availability in biochar produced from dairy manure and biosolids. Organic Geochemistry 51, 45–54.
Chemical and bioassay characterisation of nitrogen availability in biochar produced from dairy manure and biosolids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtlWltrrF&md5=9717b35fe60b12c9d0d53b7459432136CAS |

Wick AF, Stahl PD, Ingram LJ, Vicklund L (2009) Soil aggregation and organic carbon in short-term stockpiles. Soil Use and Management 25, 311–319.
Soil aggregation and organic carbon in short-term stockpiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woolf D Amonette JE Street-Perrott FA Lehmann J Joseph S 2010 Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications 1 1 9 www.nature.com/srep/2013/130425/srep01732/full/srep01732.html

Xu C, Liu WP, Sheng GD (2008) Burned rice straw reduces the availability of clomazone to barnyardgrass. The Science of the Total Environment 392, 284–289.
Burned rice straw reduces the availability of clomazone to barnyardgrass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFWgsLw%3D&md5=cdbdc479020cdbcda372c3e59275ff5fCAS | 18178240PubMed |

Yang YN, Sheng GY, Huang MS (2006) Bioavailability of diuron in soil containing wheat-straw-derived char. The Science of the Total Environment 354, 170–178.
Bioavailability of diuron in soil containing wheat-straw-derived char.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhvVCntg%3D%3D&md5=4f9f82bdc73e990aecb9eabcc2ef47dcCAS |

Yao Y, Gao B, Fang J, Zhang M, Chen H, Zhou Y, Creamer AE, Sun Y, Yang L (2014) Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chemical Engineering Journal 242, 136–143.
Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXislKntrY%3D&md5=9c8537eed5e1694d2bfcd8146edf2fc0CAS |

Zech W, Haumaier L, Hempfling R (1990) Ecological aspects of soil organic matter in tropical land use. In ‘Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: Selected readings’. (Eds P McCarthy et al.) pp. 187–202. (ASA and SSSA: Madison, WI, USA)

Zhao L, Cao X, Wang Q, Yang F, Xu S (2013) Mineral constituents profile of biochar derived from diversified waste biomasses: Implications for agricultural applications. Journal of Environmental Quality 42, 545–552.
Mineral constituents profile of biochar derived from diversified waste biomasses: Implications for agricultural applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXntVChu70%3D&md5=8ac1fa278511a242729b21a87af8d581CAS | 23673847PubMed |