A combined equation to estimate the soil pore-water electrical conductivity: calibration with the WET and 5TE sensors
Fernando Visconti A C , Delfina Martínez B , María José Molina B , Florencio Ingelmo A B and José Miguel de Paz A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centro para el Desarrollo de la Agricultura Sostenible – CDAS, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias – IVIA (GV), Crta. Moncada-Nàquera km 4.5, 46113 Moncada, València, Spain.
B Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación – CIDE (CSIC, UVEG, GV), Crta. Moncada-Nàquera km 4.5, 46113 Moncada, València, Spain.
C Corresponding author. Email: fernando.visconti@uv.es
Soil Research 52(5) 419-430 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR13331
Submitted: 16 November 2013 Accepted: 10 March 2014 Published: 26 June 2014
Abstract
Affordable, commercial dielectric sensors of the frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) and capacitance–conductance (CC) types estimate the dielectric permittivity (εb) and electrical conductivity (σb) of bulk soil. In this work, an equation was obtained to estimate the pore-water electrical conductivity (σp), which is closely related to the soil salinity in contact with plant roots, from εb and σb data, by combining the simplified dielectric mixing (SDM) model that relates εb to the soil volumetric water content (θ), with the Rhoades equation that relates θ and σb to σp. This equation was calibrated with measurements of εb and σb obtained with the Delta-T WET (FDR) and the Decagon 5TE (CC) sensors, in 20 pots filled with a clay loam soil and arranged as combinations of four levels of soil moisture with five levels of soil salinity. The calibrations were performed against reference θ and σp values. The σp was calculated with the chemical equilibrium model SALSOLCHEMEC and used as a more reliable reference than the electrical conductivity of the soil wetting water. For both sensors, the SDM model on the one hand, and the Rhoades equation on the other, provided the most accurate estimations using the least number of parameters regarding their respective alternatives, i.e. the third-order polynomial and the Hilhorst equation. The combined equation for estimation of σp subsequently provided root mean square deviations of 3.1 (WET) and 4.1 (5TE) dS m–1, which decreased to 1.5 and 2.6 dS m–1 for θ >0.22 m3 m–3, and σb <3 (WET) and 3.7 (5TE) dS m–1. A new combined equation has been proposed for reliable estimations of σp with these sensors in clayey soils for θ >0.22 m3 m–3 and σb <3.7 dS m–1.
Additional keywords: capacitance, frequency domain, irrigation, salinity, sensor.
References
Bittelli M, Salvatorelli F, Pisa PR (2008) Correction of TDR-based soil water content measurements in conductive soils. Geoderma 143, 133–142.| Correction of TDR-based soil water content measurements in conductive soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman HD (1965) Cation-exchange capacity. In ‘Methods of soil analysis—chemical and microbiological properties’. (Ed. CA Black) pp. 891–901. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)
Davis J (1984) Composites, high performance. In ‘Concise encyclopedia of chemical technology’. (Eds RE Kirk, DF Othmer, M Grayson, D Eckroth) p. 281. (Wiley-Interscience: New York)
Decagon Devices (2010) ‘5TE water content, EC and temperature sensors operator’s manual version 6.’ (Decagon Devices Inc.: Pullman, WA, USA)
Delta-T Devices (2007) ‘User manual for the WET sensor.’ (Delta-T Devices Ltd.: Cambridge, UK)
Evett SR (2007) Soil water and monitoring technology. In ‘Irrigation of agricultural crops’. (Eds BA Stewart, DR Nielsen) pp. 25–84. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA: Madison, WI, USA)
FAO (2002) ‘Crops and drops. Making the best use of water for agriculture.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)
Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA (1995) ‘Salinisation of land and water resources: Human causes, extent, management and case studies.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Hamed Y, Persson M, Berndtsson R (2003) Soil solution electrical conductivity measurements using different dielectric techniques. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 1071–1078.
| Soil solution electrical conductivity measurements using different dielectric techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlslCqtL8%3D&md5=f17884ca3bf2b75a347f9f20aa96dfaeCAS |
Hamed Y, Samy G, Persson M (2006) Evaluation of the WET sensor compared to time domain reflectometry. Hydrological Sciences Journal (Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques) 51, 671–681.
| Evaluation of the WET sensor compared to time domain reflectometry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hilhorst MA (2000) A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1922–1925.
| A pore water conductivity sensor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhsFSmsA%3D%3D&md5=796c5e4d008cafd4a0bb17ad8d09d79cCAS |
Inoue M, Ahmed BAO, Saito T, Irshad M, Uzoma K (2008) Comparison of three dielectric moisture sensors for measurement of water in saline sandy soil. Soil Use and Management 24, 156–162.
| Comparison of three dielectric moisture sensors for measurement of water in saline sandy soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IUSS Working Group WRB 2006. ‘World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006.’ 2nd edn. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. (FAO: Rome)
Kargas G, Kerkides P (2012) Comparison of two models in predicting pore water electrical conductivity in different porous media. Geoderma 189–190, 563–573.
| Comparison of two models in predicting pore water electrical conductivity in different porous media.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelleners TJ, Verma AK (2010) Measured and modeled dielectric properties of soils at 50 Megahertz. Soil Science Society of America Journal 74, 744–752.
| Measured and modeled dielectric properties of soils at 50 Megahertz.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmtVWmsr0%3D&md5=ebe51169f921718dcaadfd153a9ea335CAS |
Kelleners TJ, Soppe RWO, Ayars JE, Skaggs TH (2004) Calibration of capacitance probe sensors in a saline silty clay soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 770–778.
| Calibration of capacitance probe sensors in a saline silty clay soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXktV2gtLg%3D&md5=d077f08d20d5c813288b463c470b7aceCAS |
Kelleners TJ, Robinson DA, Shouse PJ, Ayars JE, Skaggs TH (2005) Frequency dependence of the complex permittivity and its impact on dielectric sensor calibration in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 67–76.
Kizito F, Campbell CS, Campbell GS, Cobos DR, Teare BL, Carter B, Hopmans JW (2008) Frequency, electrical conductivity and temperature analysis of a low-cost capacitance soil moisture sensor. Journal of Hydrology 352, 367–378.
| Frequency, electrical conductivity and temperature analysis of a low-cost capacitance soil moisture sensor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leao TP, Perfect E, Tyner JS (2010) New semi-empirical formulae for predicting soil solution conductivity from dielectric properties at 50 MHz. Journal of Hydrology 393, 321–330.
| New semi-empirical formulae for predicting soil solution conductivity from dielectric properties at 50 MHz.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtlSht77J&md5=81a7a009626ffbc73f2a183575825c9cCAS |
Malicki MA, Walczak RT (1999) Evaluating soil salinity status from bulk electrical conductivity and permittivity. European Journal of Soil Science 50, 505–514.
| Evaluating soil salinity status from bulk electrical conductivity and permittivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miyamoto T, Maruyama A (2004) Dielectric coated water content reflectometer for improved monitoring of near surface soil moisture in heavily fertilized paddy field. Agricultural Water Management 64, 161–168.
| Dielectric coated water content reflectometer for improved monitoring of near surface soil moisture in heavily fertilized paddy field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nadler A (2005) Methodologies and the practical aspects of the bulk soil (σa)–soil solution EC (σw) relations. Advances in Agronomy 88, 273–312.
| Methodologies and the practical aspects of the bulk soil (σa)–soil solution EC (σw) relations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Regalado CM, Ritter A, Rodríguez-González RM (2007) Performance of the commercial WET capacitance sensor as compared with time domain reflectometry in volcanic soils. Vadose Zone Journal 6, 244–254.
| Performance of the commercial WET capacitance sensor as compared with time domain reflectometry in volcanic soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXltVygu7s%3D&md5=8feedb1df96d1fe0c29b36fe5e902b7eCAS |
Rhoades JD, Raats PAC, Prather RJ (1976) Effects of liquid‐phase electrical conductivity, water content, and surface conductivity on bulk soil electrical conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 651–655.
| Effects of liquid‐phase electrical conductivity, water content, and surface conductivity on bulk soil electrical conductivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rhoades JD, Manteghi NA, Shouse PJ, Alves WJ (1989) Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: new formulations and calibrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53, 433–439.
| Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: new formulations and calibrations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rosenbaum U, Huisman JA, Wenthen A, Vereecken H, Bogena HR (2010) Sensor-to-sensor variability of the ECH2O EC-5, TE, and 5TE sensors in dielectric liquids. Vadose Zone Journal 9, 181–186.
| Sensor-to-sensor variability of the ECH2O EC-5, TE, and 5TE sensors in dielectric liquids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rosenbaum U, Huisman JA, Vrba J, Vereecken H, Bogena HR (2011) Correction of temperature and electrical conductivity effects on dielectric permittivity measurements with ECH2O sensors. Vadose Zone Journal 10, 582–593.
| Correction of temperature and electrical conductivity effects on dielectric permittivity measurements with ECH2O sensors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXotVGjsrw%3D&md5=a08188d39c97fbfa9b90a6d6ea42e2b0CAS |
Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research 16, 574–582.
| Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Varble JL, Chávez JL (2011) Performance evaluation and calibration of soil water content and potential sensors for agricultural soils in eastern Colorado. Agricultural Water Management 101, 93–106.
| Performance evaluation and calibration of soil water content and potential sensors for agricultural soils in eastern Colorado.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Visconti F (2011) SALSOLCHEMEC: an application to calculate the salt speciation in the soil solution and the exchange complex at equilibrium. Available at: www.uv.es/fervisre/salsolchemec
Visconti F, de Paz JM (2012) Prediction of the soil saturated paste extract salinity from extractable ions, cation exchange capacity, and anion exclusion. Soil Research 50, 536–550.
| Prediction of the soil saturated paste extract salinity from extractable ions, cation exchange capacity, and anion exclusion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xhs12jsrvI&md5=7ee57a257303ab4fb5fd98ba6f93f2a5CAS |
Visconti F, de Paz JM, Martínez D, Molina MJ (2014) Laboratory and field assessment of the capacitance sensors Decagon 10HS and 5TE for estimating the water content of irrigated soils. Agricultural Water Management 132, 111–119.
| Laboratory and field assessment of the capacitance sensors Decagon 10HS and 5TE for estimating the water content of irrigated soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whalley WR (1993) Considerations on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content. Journal of Soil Science 44, 1–9.
| Considerations on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolt JD (1994) ‘Soil solution chemistry.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)
Xu JH, Ma XY, Logsdon SD, Horton R (2012) Short, multineedle frequency domain reflectometry sensor suitable for measuring soil water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76, 1929–1937.
| Short, multineedle frequency domain reflectometry sensor suitable for measuring soil water content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVelsLbL&md5=4ad8cb840c58823d034e826fbb3f681fCAS |
