Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Boron contents and solubility in Australian fly ashes and its uptake by canola (Brassica napus L.) from the ash-amended soils

V. Manoharan A , I. A. M. Yunusa A D E , P. Loganathan B , R. Lawrie C , B. R. Murray A , C. G. Skilbeck A and D. Eamus A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.

B Soil and Earth Sciences, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

C NSW Agriculture, Department of Primary Industries, Locked Bag, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia.

D Current address: School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: isa.yunusa@une.edu.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 48(5) 480-487 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10073
Submitted: 21 September 2009  Accepted: 16 April 2010   Published: 6 August 2010

Abstract

Phytotoxicity due to excessive boron (B) uptake by plants impedes routine agronomic utilisation of coal fly ash. We assessed 11 fly ashes (pH 3.14–10.77) having total B content (Bt) of 12–136 mg/kg, of which 20–30% was hot water soluble (Bs) in the acidic ashes (pH <5) and 5–10% in the alkaline ashes, for their potential to supply B to plants and their risk associated with phytotoxicity. We found the Bs/Bt to be negatively correlated (R2 = 0.63**, N = 11) with ash pH.

We conducted two pot trials in which canola was grown in soils amended with fly ash. In the first trial, an alkaline fly ash (Bt 66 mg/kg) was incorporated at 5 rates of up to 625 Mg/ha into the top 50 mm of 2 acidic soils in 0.30-m-long intact cores, and sown with canola. Boron concentration in leaves at flowering reached the phytotoxic threshold, and both plant growth and seed yield were reduced, only at 625 Mg/ha. In the second trial, 4 fly ashes (pH 3.29–10.77, Bt 12–127 mg/kg) were incorporated at 4 rates of up to 108 Mg/ha into the top 0.10 m of 2 acidic soils in 1.0-m-long intact cores and then sown with canola. Ashes with highest Bt, when applied at 108 Mg/ha, increased B concentration in the topsoil only. Of the 2 ashes with the highest Bt, only that which produced low soil pH and applied at 108 Mg/ha increased B concentration in the shoot, but was still below phytotoxic threshold. The results suggest that B derived from these ashes may not cause phytotoxicity and excessive soil B accumulation if the ashes are applied at modest rates (<36 Mg/ha) to the topsoil layers.

Additional keywords: trace elements, boron toxicity, soil boron, soil pH.


Acknowledgments

We acknowledge with appreciation the assistance with laboratory procedures and facilities from Ms Narelle Richardson and Ms Gemma Armstrong, and thank Messers Nawash Haddad, Aining Mao, and Ibby Yunusa for their help with the intact soil core collection and with soil and plant processing. We express our gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Damian Gore and Mr Russell Field at Macquarie University for assisting with microwave digestion of the samples. We also thank Mr Jim Keegan at the Department of Chemistry, University of Technology Sydney, for his help with the ICP-MS analysis. We appreciate the valuable comments made by the two anonymous referees on the manuscript. This study was funded by the Ash Development Association of Australia and the Australian Research Council (LP045511).


References


Adriano DC, Page AL, Elseewi AA, Chang AC, Straughan I (1980) Utilization and disposal of fly ash and other coal residues in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 9, 333–344.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | (accessed August 2009).

NHMRC and ARMCAN (1996) National Water Quality Management Strategy. Australian drinking water guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/_files/eh19.pdf (accessed 17 Sept. 08).

Pathan SM, Aylmore LAG, Colmer TD (2003) Soil properties and turf growth on a sandy soil amended with fly ash. Plant and Soil 256, 103–114.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Phung HT, Lam HV, Page AL, Lund LJ (1979) The practice of leaching boron and soluble salts from fly ash-amended soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 12, 247–254.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Pougnet MAB, Wyrleybirch JM, Orren MJ (1990) The boron and lithium content of South-African coals and coal ashes. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 38, 539–549.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Rayment G , Higginson F (1992) ‘Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods.’ (Inkata Press, Reed Book International Australia Pty Ltd: Sydney)

Reuter DJ , Edwards DG , Wilhelm NS (1997) Temperate and tropical crops. In ‘Plant analysis: an interpretation manual’. (Eds DJ Reuter, JB Robinson) pp. 83–284. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Sims JT, Vasilas BL, Ghodrati M (1995) Evaluation of fly-ash as a soil amendment for the Atlantic Coastal Plain 2. Soil chemical properties and crop growth. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 81, 363–372.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Soil Survey Staff (1992) ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 5th edn. SMSS Technical Monograph No. 19. (Pocahontas Press Inc.: Blacksburg, VA)

Yunusa IAM, Eamus D, DeSilva DL, Murray BR, Burchett MD, Skilbeck GC, Heidrich C (2006) Fly-ash: an exploitable resource for management of Australian agricultural soils. Fuel 85, 2337–2344.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Yunusa IAM, Manoharan V, DeSilva DL, Eamus D, Murray BR, Nissanka SP (2008) Growth and elemental accumulation by canola on soil amended with coal fly ash. Journal of Environmental Quality 37, 1263–1270.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1