Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sequential indicator simulation and indicator kriging estimation of 3-dimensional soil textures

Y. He A B , D. Chen B , B. G. Li A , Y. F. Huang A , K. L. Hu A C , Y. Li B and I. R. Willett B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Soil and Water Sciences, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

B School of Resource Management and Geography, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: hukel@cau.edu.cn

Australian Journal of Soil Research 47(6) 622-631 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08218
Submitted: 29 September 2008  Accepted: 6 May 2009   Published: 30 September 2009

Abstract

The complex distribution characteristics of soil textures at a large or regional scale are difficult to understand with the current state of knowledge and limited soil profile data. In this study, an indicator variogram was used to describe the spatial structural characteristics of soil textures of 139 soil profiles. The profiles were 2 m deep with sampling intervals of 0.05 m, from an area of 15 km2 in the North China Plain. The ratios of nugget-to-sill values (SH) of experimental variograms of the soil profiles in the vertical direction were equal to 0, showing strong spatial auto-correlation. In contrast, SH ratios of 0.48–0.81 in the horizontal direction, with sampling distances of ~300 m, showed weaker spatial auto-correlation. Sequential indicator simulation (SIS) and indicator kriging (IK) methods were then used to simulate and estimate the 3D spatial distribution of soil textures. The outcomes of the 2 methods were evaluated by the reproduction of the histogram and variogram, and by mean absolute error of predictions. Simulated results conducted on dense and sparse datasets showed that when denser sample data are used, complex patterns of soil textures can be captured and simulated realisations can reproduce variograms with reasonable fluctuations. When data are sparse, a general pattern of major soil textures still can be captured, with minor textures being poorly simulated or estimated. The results also showed that when data are sufficient, the reproduction of the histogram and variogram by SIS was significantly better than by the IK method for the predominant texture (clay). However, when data are sparse, there is little difference between the 2 methods.

Additional keywords: soil textures, spatial variability, 3D, SIS and IK.


Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Weidong Li (Kent State University) for providing the data used in this paper. We also thank Dr Jianbing Wu (Stanford University) and Dr Helen Suter for their constructive comments. We appreciate funding support of the National Key Basic Research Special Funds (2009CB118607), ACIAR project (LWR/2003/039), the National Key Technologies R&D Program (2006BDA10A06), and by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-07-0809).


References


Bastante FG, Ordóñez C, Taboada J, Matías JM (2008) Comparison of indicator kriging, conditional indicator simulation and multiple-point statistics used to model slate deposits. Engineering Geology 98, 50–59.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bierkens MFP, Weerts HJT (1994) Application of indicator simulation to modeling the lithological properties of a complex confining layer. Geoderma 62, 265–284.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Castrignanò A, Goovaerts P, Lulli L, Bragato G (2000) A geostatistical approach to estimate probability of occurrence of Tuber melanosporum in relation to some soil properties. Geoderma 98, 95–113.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Deutsch CV (2006) A sequential indicator simulation program for categorical variables with point and block data: BlockSIS. Computers & Geosciences 32, 1669–1681.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Deutsch CV , Journel AG (1998) ‘GSLIB, Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Eagleman JR, Jamison VC (1962) Soil layering and compaction effects on unsaturated moisture movement. Soil Science Society of America Journal 26, 519–522. open url image1

Esbensen KH, Friis-Petersen HH, Petersen L, Holm-Nielsen JB, Mortensen PP (2007) Representative process sampling—in practice: Variographic analysis and estimation of total sampling errors (TSE). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 88, 41–59.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Falivene O, Cabrera L, Sáez A (2007) Optimum and robust 3D facies interpolation strategies in a heterogeneous coal zone (Tertiary as pontes basin, NW Spain). International Journal of Coal Geology 71, 185–208.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Finke PA, Bouma J, Stein A (1992) Measuring field variability of disturbed soils for simulation purposes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 187–192. open url image1

Goovaerts P (1997) ‘Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Goovaerts P (1999) Impact of the simulation algorithm, magnitude of ergodic fluctuations and number of realizations on the spaces of uncertainty of flow properties. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 13(3), 161–182.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Goovaerts P (2000) Estimation or simulation of soil properties? An optimization problem with conflicting criteria. Geoderma 97, 165–186.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Goovaerts P, Webster R, Dubois JP (1997) Assessing the risk of soil contamination in the Swiss Jura using indicator geostatistics. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4, 49–64.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Grunwald S, Barak P, McSweeney K, Lowery B (2000) SOIL landscape models at different scales portrayed in virtual reality modeling. Soil Science 165(8), 598–615.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Hengl T, Toomanian N, Reuter HI, Malakouti MJ (2007) Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profile observations: Lessons from Iran. Geoderma 140, 417–427.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Isaaks EH , Srivastava RM (1989) ‘Applied geostatistics.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Juang KW, Chen YS, Lee DY (2004) Using sequential indicator simulation to assess the uncertainty of delineating heavy-metal contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution 127, 229–238.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Lee SY, Carle SF, Fogg GE (2007) Geologic heterogeneity and a comparison of two geostatistical models: Sequential Gaussian and transition probability-based geostatistical simulation. Advances in Water Resources 30, 1914–1932.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leij FJ, Dane JH, van Genuchten MT (1991) Mathematical analysis of one-dimensional solute in a layered soil profile. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, 944–953. open url image1

Li WD, Li BG, Shi YC (1999) Markov-chain simulation of soil textural profiles. Geoderma 92, 37–53.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Li WD, Li BG, Shi YC, Tang DY (1997) Application of the Markov chain theory to describe spatial distribution of textural layers. Soil Science 162, 672–683.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Li WD, Zhang C (2006) A generalized Markov Chain Approach for conditional simulation of categorical variables from grid samples. Transactions in GIS 10(4), 651–669.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lin YP, Chang TK, Shih CW, Tseng CH (2002) Factorial and indicator kriging methods using a geographic information system to delineate spatial variation and pollution sources of soil heavy metals. Environmental Geology 42, 900–909.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Liu YH, Yu ZR, Zhang FR, Song CM, Liu Y (2005) Dynamic change of soil organic matter and its affecting factors at county level. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science 11(3), 294–301. open url image1

Olea RA, Pawlowsky V (1996) Compensating for estimation smoothing in kriging. Mathematical Geology 28, 407–417.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Plante AF, Conant RT, Stewart CE, Paustian K, Six J (2006) Impact of soil texture on the distribution of soil organic matter in physical and chemical fractions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 287–296.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Regli C, Rosenthaler L, Huggenberger P (2004) GEOSSAV: a simulation tool for subsurface applications. Computers & Geosciences 30, 221–238.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Remy N , Boucher A , Wu JB (2008) ‘Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Robertson GP, Crum JR, Ellis BG (1993) The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance. Oecologia 96, 451–456.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Santanello JA, Peters-Lidard CD, Garcia ME, Mocko DM, Tischler MA, Moran MS, Thoma DP (2007) Using remotely-sensed estimates of soil moisture to infer soil texture and hydraulic properties across a semi-arid watershed. Remote Sensing of Environment 110, 79–97.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weerts HJT, Bierkens MFP (1993) Geostatistical analysis of overbank deposits of anastomosing and meanding fluvial systems – Rhine Meuse Delta, The Netherlands. Sedimentary Geology 85, 221–232.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhou LZ, Selim HM (2001) Solute transport in layered soils: nonlinear and kinetic reactivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 1056–1064.
CAS |
open url image1