Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of alkaline flyash-based products to amend acid soils: Extractability of selected elements and their uptake by plants

K. M. Spark A B and R. S. Swift A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Queensland, Faculty of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: kaye.spark@uq.edu.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 46(7) 585-599 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07210
Submitted: 27 November 2007  Accepted: 14 July 2008   Published: 8 October 2008

Abstract

In addition to promoting plant growth, the incorporation of flyash material into soil also has the potential to affect the solubility and plant availability of some elements. This paper reports on the effect of 2 flyash products (FAP) on the extractability and plant uptake as a function of pH of selected elements of concern in the environment: As, B, Cd, Co, Cu, Cr, Mn, Pb, Ni, and Zn. The results for the growth response of maize plants (Zea mays L.) in the FAP-amended soils have been reported in a companion paper. The addition of the FAP to the soils used in this study at rates up to 5% w/w resulted in increased levels of Cu, Mn, Ni, As, and Co in an acetic acid extract. The levels of Cr, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn, As, and Co in these extracts all showed a dependency on pH for some soils. Maize plants grown in the amended soils exhibited an increase in the plant uptake of Cu, Mn, and Ni in some soils. However, none of the elements studied increased the plant uptake to levels which would generally be considered toxic to plants or cause problems in the food chain. The presence of the FAP decreased the plant availability of Ni at low pH and levels of Mn and Cd in the acetic acid extract were decreased, most likely due to sorption of these elements by the FAP.

There is no evidence that either the flyash alone, or the 2 FAP used in this study would pose a threat to plants or the environment when used at levels of up to 5% w/w. Possible beneficial effects for the environment were observed as the incorporation of FAP into soils has the capacity to reduce the uptake and potential toxicity of Cd, Ni, or Mn in some soils.

Additional keywords: flyash, soil acidity, soil amendments, acetic acid extract, plant uptake, contaminants.


Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Central Research Institute of the Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) in Japan.


References


Adriano DC, Weber J, Bolan NS, Paramasivam S, Koo B-J, Sajan KS (2002) Effects of high rates of coal flyash on soil turfgrass and groundwater quality. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 139, 365–385.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Aitken RL, Campbell DJ, Bell LC (1984) Properties of Australian flyashes relevant to their agronomic utilisation. Australian Journal of Soil Research 22, 443–453.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ariese F, Swart K, Morabito R, Brunori C, Balzamo S, Slobodník J, Korenková E, Janoš P, Wildnerová M, Hlavay J, Polyák K, Fodor P, Muntau H (2002) Leaching studies of inorganic and organic compounds from fly ash. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 82, 751–770.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

ASTM (2003) American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C618, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

Baba A, Kaya A (2004) Leaching characteristics of solid wastes from thermal power plants of western Turkey and comparison of toxicity methodologies. Journal of Environmental Management 73, 199–207.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bertocchi AF, Ghiani M, Peretti R, Zucca A (2006) Red mud and fly ash for remediation of mine sites contaminated with As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn. Journal of Hazardous Materials 134, 112–119.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Brake S, Jensen RR, Mattox JM (2004) Effects of coal flyash amended soils on trace element uptake in plants. Environmental Geology 45, 680–689.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Carlson CL, Adriano DC (1993) Environmental impacts of coal combustion residues. Journal of Environmental Quality 22, 227–247. open url image1

Clark RB , Zeto SK , Baligar VC , Ritchey KD (1999) Nickel, lead, cadmium and chromium concentrations in shoots of maize grown in acidic soil amended with coal combustion by-products. In ‘Biogeochemistry of trace elements in coal and coal combustion byproducts.’ (Eds KS Sajwan, AK Alva, RF Keefer) (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York)

Clark RB, Zeto SK, Ritchey KD, Baligar VC (2001) Mineral acquisition by maize grown in acidic soil amended with coal combustion products. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32, 1861–1884.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dudal Y, Sevenier G, Dupont L, Guillon E (2005) Fate of the metal-binding soluble organic matter throughout a soil profile. Soil Science 170, 707–715.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

El-Mogazi D, Lisk DJ, Weinstein H (1988) A review of physical, chemical, and biological properties of flyash and effects on agricultural ecosystems. The Science of the Total Environment 74, 1–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Elseewi AA, Straughan IR, Page AL (1980) Sequential cropping of flyash-amended soils: effects on soil chemical properties and yield and elemental composition of plants. The Science of the Total Environment 15, 247–259.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fordham AW, Norrish K (1983) The nature of soil particles particularly those reacting with arsenate in a series of chemically treated samples. Australian Journal of Soil Research 21, 455–477.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fotovat A, Naidu R, Sumner ME (1997) Water:soil ratio influences aqueous phase chemistry of indigenous copper and zinc in soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 687–709.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gangloff WJ, Ghodrati M, Sims JT, Vasilas BL (1997) Field study: Influence of flyash on leachate composition in an excessively drained soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 26, 714–723. open url image1

Goldberg S (2002) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 413–421. open url image1

Goodarzi F, Huggins FE (2001) Monitoring the species of arsenic chromium and nickel in milled coal bottom ash and flyash from a pulverized coal-fired power plant in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Environmental Monitoring 3, 1–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hosseini SM, Maftoun M, Karimian N, Ronaghi A, Emam Y (2007) Effect of Zinc × Boron interaction on plant growth and tissue nutrient concentration of corn. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30, 773–781.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jala S, Goyal D (2006) Flyash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production—a review. Bioresource Technology 97, 1136–1147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Kaakinen JW, Jorden RM, Lawasani MH, West RE (1975) Trace element behavior in coal-fired power plant. Environmental Science & Technology 9, 862–869.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kane JS (1995) Leach data vs. total: which is relevant for SRMs? Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry 352, 209–213.
Crossref |
open url image1

Kantiranis N, Filippidis A, Georgakopoulos A (2005) Investigation of the uptake ability of fly ashes produced after lignite combustion. Journal of Environmental Management 76, 119–123.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Kingston HM, Walter PJ (1992) Comparison of microwave versus conventional dissolution for environmental applications. Spectroscopy 7, 20–27. open url image1

Kukier U, Sumner ME (1996) Boron availability to plants from coal combustion by-products. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 87, 93–110.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lee H, Ha HS, Lee CH, Lee YB, Kim PJ (2006) Flyash effect on improving soil properties and rice productivity in Korean paddy soils. Bioresource Technology 97, 1490–1497.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Macnicol RD, Beckett PHT (1985) Critical tissue concentrations of potentially toxic elements. Plant and Soil 85, 107–129.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Magalhães MCF (2002) Arsenic. An environmental problem limited by solubility. Pure and Applied Chemistry 74, 1843–1850.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mattigod SV , Rai D , Amonette JE (1999) Concentrations and distribution of major and selected trace elements in size-density fractionated flyashes. In ‘Biogeochemistry of trace elements in coal and coal combustion byproducts.’ (Eds KS Sajwan, AK Alva, RF Keefer) pp. 115–131. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York)

Mukherjee AB , Ryunosuke K (1999) Coal ash from thermal power plants in Finland. Ch 4. In ‘Biogeochemistry of trace elements in coal and coal combustion byproducts.’ (Eds KS Sajwan, AK Alva, RF Keefer) pp. 59–76. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York)

O’Reilly SE, Sims JT (1995) Phosphorus adsorption and desorption in a sandy soil amended with high rates of coal fly ash. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26, 2983–2993. open url image1

Pathan SM, Aylmore LAG, Colmer TD (2003a) Soil properties and turf growth on a sandy soil amended with flyash. Plant and Soil 256, 103–114.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pathan SM, Aylmore LAG, Colmer TD (2003b) Properties of several flyash materials in relation to use as soil amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality 32, 687–693.
PubMed |
open url image1

Potgieter JH, Potgieter-Vermaak SS, Modise J, Basson N (2005) Removal of iron and manganese from water with a high organic carbon loading. Part II: The effect of various adsorbents and nanofiltration membranes. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 162, 61–70.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rayment GE , Higginson FR (1992) ‘Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods – Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbook.’ (Inkata Press: Melbourne)

Rio S, Delebarre A, Héquet V, Le Cloirec P, Blondin J (2002) Metallic ion removal from aqueous solutions by flyashes: multicomponent studies. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 77, 382–388.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scheckel KG, Sparks DL (2001) Dissolution kinetics of nickel surface precipitates on clay mineral and oxide surfaces. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 685–694. open url image1

Sharma AD, Brar MS, Malhi SS (2005) Critical toxic ranges of chromium in spinach plants and in soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28, 1555–1568.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Silberman D, Harris WR (1984) Determination of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) in coal and oil flyashes. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 17, 73–83.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Spark KM, Swift RS (2008) Use of alkaline flyash-based products to amend acid soils: Plant growth response and nutrient uptake. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 578–584. open url image1

Spark KM, Wells JD, Johnson BB (1997) Sorption of heavy metals by mineral-humic acid substrates. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 113–122.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Summers RM, Clarke M, Pope T, O’Dea T (1998) Western Australian flyash on sandy soils for clover production. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29, 2757–2767. open url image1

Tsiridis V, Samaras P, Kungolos A, Sakellaropoulos GP (2006) Application of leaching tests for toxicity evaluation of coal fly ash. Environmental Toxicology 21, 409–416.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Tyler G, Olsson T (2001) Concentrations of 60 elements in the soil solution as related to the soil acidity. European Journal of Soil Science 52, 151–165.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

US EPA (2007) US Environmental Protection Authority SW-846 Manual Test Method 1311. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods. National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, USA.

Wong JWC, Jiang RF, Su DC (1996) Boron availability in ash-sludge mixture and its uptake by corn seedlings (Zea mays L.). Soil Science 161, 182–187.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wong JWC, Wong MH (1990) Effects of flyash on yields and elemental composition of two vegetables Brassica parachinensis and B. chinensis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 30, 251–264.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1