A review of the changes in soil quality and profitability accomplished by sowing rotation crops after cotton in Australian Vertosols from 1970 to 2006
N. R. Hulugalle A C and F. Scott BA New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Cotton Catchment Communities Co-operative Research Centre, Australian Cotton Research Institute, Locked Bag 1000, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia.
B New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Cotton Catchment Communities Co-operative Research Centre, Tamworth Agricultural Institute, 4 Marsden Park Road, Calala, NSW 2340, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: nilanthah@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Soil Research 46(2) 173-190 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07077
Submitted: 5 June 2007 Accepted: 21 January 2008 Published: 18 March 2008
Abstract
In agricultural systems, soil quality is thought of in terms of productive land that can maintain or increase farm profitability, as well as conserving soil resources so that future farming generations can make a living. Management practices which can modify soil quality include tillage systems and crop rotations. A major proportion of Australian cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is grown on Vertosols (~75%), of which almost 80% is irrigated. These soils have high clay contents (40–80 g/100 g) and strong shrink–swell capacities, but are frequently sodic at depth and prone to deterioration in soil physical quality if incorrectly managed. Due to extensive yield losses caused by widespread deterioration of soil structure and declining fertility associated with tillage, trafficking, and picking under wet conditions during the middle and late 1970s, a major research program was initiated with the objective of developing soil management systems which could improve cotton yields while concurrently ameliorating and maintaining soil structure and fertility. An outcome of this research was the identification of cotton–winter crop sequences sown in a 1 : 1 rotation as being able to sustain lint yields while at the same time maintaining soil physical quality and minimising fertility decline. Consequently, today, a large proportion (~75%) of Australian cotton is grown in rotation with winter cereals such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), or legumes such as faba bean (Vicia faba L.).
A second phase of research on cotton rotations in Vertosols was initiated during the early 1990s with the main objective of identifying sustainable cotton–rotation crop sequences; viz. crop sequences which maintained and improved soil quality, minimised disease incidence, facilitated soil organic carbon sequestration, and maximised economic returns and cotton water use efficiency in the major commercial cotton-growing regions of Australia. The objective of this review was to summarise the key findings of both these phases of Australian research with respect to soil quality and profitability, and identify future areas of for research.
Wheat rotation crops under irrigated and dryland conditions and in a range of climates where cotton is grown can improve soil quality indicators such as subsoil structure, salinity, and sodicity under irrigated and dryland conditions, while leguminous crops can increase available nitrogen by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, and by reducing N volatilisation and leaching losses. Soil organic carbon in most locations has decreased with time, although the rate of decrease may be reduced by sowing crop sequences that return about 2 kg/m2.crop cycle of residues to the soil, minimising tillage and optimising N inputs. Although the beneficial effects of soil biodiversity on quality of soil are claimed to be many, except for a few studies on soil macrofauna such as ants, conclusive field-based evidence to demonstrate this has not been forthcoming with respect to cotton rotations.
In general, lowest average lint yields per hectare were with cotton monoculture. The cotton–wheat systems generally returned higher average gross margins/ML irrigation water than cotton monoculture and other rotation crops. This indicates that where irrigation water, rather than land, is the limiting resource, cotton–wheat systems would be more profitable. Recently, the addition of vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) to the cotton–wheat system has further improved average cotton yields and profitability. Profitability of cotton–wheat sequences varies with the relative price of cotton to wheat. In comparison with cotton monoculture, cotton–rotation crop sequences may be more resilient to price increases in fuel and fertiliser due to lower overall input costs. The profitability of cotton–rotation crop sequences such as cotton–wheat, where cotton is not sown in the same field every year, is more resilient to fluctuations in the price of cotton lint, fuel and nitrogen fertiliser.
This review identified several issues with respect to cotton–rotation crop sequences where knowledge is lacking or very limited. These are: research into ‘new’ crop rotations; comparative soil quality effects of managing rotation crop stubble; machinery attachments for managing rotation crop stubble in situ in permanent bed systems; the minimum amount of crop stubble which needs to be returned per cropping cycle to increase SOC levels from present values; the relative efficacy of C3 and C4 rotation crops in relation to carbon sequestration; the interactions between soil biodiversity and soil physical and chemical quality indicators, and cotton yields; and the effects of sowing rotation crops after cotton on farm and cotton industry economic indicators such as the economic incentives for adopting new cotton rotations, farm level impacts of research and extension investments, and industry- and community/catchment-wide economic modelling of the impact of cotton research and extension activities.
Acknowledgments
Funding support from the Co-operative Research Centre (CRC) for Sustainable Cotton Production, Australian Cotton CRC, Cotton Catchment Communities CRC, and the Cotton Research and Development Corporation of Australia is gratefully acknowledged. Our thanks to Dr Judy Tisdall of LaTrobe University and Dr Ian Taylor of the Cotton Research and Development Corporation for their helpful comments during manuscript preparation.
Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO
(2000) Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Organic Geochemistry 31, 697–710.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 9 October 2007)
Causarano HJ,
Shaw JN,
Franzluebbers AJ,
Reeves DW,
Raper RL,
Balkcom KS,
Norfleet ML, Izaurralde RC
(2007) Simulating field-scale soil organic carbon dynamics using EPIC. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71, 1174–1185.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 5 October 2007)
CSD (Cotton Seed Distributors) Extension and Development Team and Hulugalle N
(2006) Delving deeper into the high yielding crops. Australian Cottongrower 25, 16–22.
(Accessed 15 October 2007)
Friend JJ, Chan KY
(1995) Influence of cropping on the population of a native earthworm and consequent effects on hydraulic properties of Vertisols. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33, 995–1006.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fujii Y
(2003) Allelopathy in the natural and agricultural ecosystems and isolation of potent allelochemicals from Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) and Hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Uchu Seibutsu Kagaku 17, 6–13.
| PubMed |
Hamel C
(1996) Prospects and problems pertaining to the management of arbuscular mycorrhizae in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 60, 197–210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hearn AB
(1986) Effect of preceding crop on the nitrogen requirements of irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on a Vertisol. Field Crops Research 13, 159–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulme PJ,
McKenzie DC,
Abbott TS, MacLeod DA
(1991) Changes in the physical properties of a Vertisol following an irrigation of cotton as influenced by the previous crop. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 425–442.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR
(1995) Effects of ant hills on soil physical properties of a Vertisol. Pedobiologia 39, 34–41.
Hulugalle NR
(2000) Carbon sequestration in irrigated Vertisols under cotton-based farming systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 31, 645–654.
Hulugalle NR
(2005) Recovering leached N by sowing wheat after irrigated cotton in a Vertisol. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27, 39–51.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Cooper J
(1994) Effect of crop rotation and residue management on properties of cracking clay soils under irrigated cotton-based farming systems of New South Wales. Land Degradation & Rehabilitation 5, 1–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Entwistle P
(1997) Soil properties, nutrient uptake and crop growth in an irrigated Vertisol after nine years of minimum tillage. Soil & Tillage Research 42, 15–32.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Entwistle PC,
Cooper JL,
Scott F,
Nehl DB,
Allen SJ, Finlay LA
(1999b) Sowing wheat or field pea as rotation crops after irrigated cotton in a grey Vertosol. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 867–890.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Entwistle PC, Lobry de Bruyn LA
(1997) Residual effects of tillage and crop rotation on soil properties, soil invertebrate numbers and nutrient in an irrigated Vertisol sown to cotton. Applied Soil Ecology 7, 11–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle N,
Entwistle P, Mensah R
(1999a) Can lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) strips improve soil quality in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fields? Applied Soil Ecology 12, 81–92.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Entwistle PC,
Scott F, Kahl J
(2001) Rotation crops for irrigated cotton in a medium-fine, self-mulching, grey Vertosol. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 317–328.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Entwistle PC,
Weaver TB,
Scott F, Finlay LA
(2002a) Cotton-based rotation systems on a sodic Vertosol under irrigation: effects on soil quality and profitability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 341–349.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Larsen DL, Hengeller S
(1996) Effect of broadbeds and dolichos residue management on properties of an irrigated Vertisol. Soil Technology 8, 275–286.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Nehl DB, Weaver TB
(2004) Soil properties, and cotton growth, yield and fibre quality in three cotton-based cropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research 75, 131–141.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Rohde KW, Yule DF
(2002b) Cropping systems and bed width effects on runoff, erosion and soil properties in a rainfed Vertisol. Land Degradation & Development 13, 363–374.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Scott F
(2006) Relative profitability of irrigated cotton rotation systems in New South Wales. Australian Cottongrower 27, 57–59.
Hulugalle N,
Tann C,
Weaver T, Fitt G
(2006c) Permanent beds, soil disturbance and heliothis moth emergence. Australian Cottongrower 27, 49–51.
Hulugalle NR, Weaver TB
(2005) Short-term variations in chemical properties of Vertisols as affected by amount, carbon : nitrogen ratio, and nutrient concentration of crop residues. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36, 1449–1464.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Weaver TB, Finlay LA
(2006a) Residual effects of cotton-based crop rotations on soil properties of irrigated Vertosols in central-western and north-western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44, 467–477.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Weaver TB,
Finlay LA,
Hare J, Entwistle PC
(2007) Soil properties and crop yields in a dryland Vertisol sown with cotton-based crop rotations. Soil & Tillage Research 93, 356–369.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR,
Weaver TB, Scott F
(2005a) Continuous cotton and cotton–wheat rotation effects on soil properties and profitability in an irrigated Vertisol. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27, 5–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Karlen DL,
Eash NS, Unger PW
(1992) Soil and crop management effects on soil quality indicators. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7, 48–55.
Lal R
(1997) Degradation and resilience of soils. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 352, 997–1008.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nehl DB,
Allen SJ, Brown JF
(1996) Mycorrhizal colonisation, root browning and soil properties associated with a growth disorder of cotton in Australia. Plant and Soil 179, 171–182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nehl DB,
Allen SJ, Brown JF
(1998) Slow arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of field-grown cotton caused by environmental conditions in the soil. Mycorrhiza 8, 159–167.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nehl DB,
McGee PA,
Torris V,
Pattinson GS, Allen SJ
(1999) Patterns of arbuscular mycorrhiza down the profile of a heavy textured soil do not reflect associated colonization potential. New Phytologist 142, 495–503.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nkem JN,
Lobry de Bruyn LA,
Grant CD, Hulugalle NR
(2000) The impact of ant bioturbation and foraging activities on surrounding soil properties. Pedobiologia 44, 609–621.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nkem JN,
Lobry de Bruyn LA,
Hulugalle NR, Grant CD
(2002) Changes in invertebrate populations over the growing cycle of an N-fertilised and unfertilised wheat crop in rotation with cotton in a grey Vertisol. Applied Soil Ecology 20, 69–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pillai UP, McGarry D
(1999) Structure repair of a compacted Vertisol with wet-dry cycles and crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, 201–210.
Radford BJ,
Key AJ,
Robertson LN, Thomas GA
(1995) Conservation tillage increases soil water storage, soil animal populations, grain yield, and response to fertiliser in the semi-arid tropics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 223–232.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reeves DW
(1997) The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research 43, 131–167.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochester IJ
(2007) Nutrient uptake and export from an Australian cotton field. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 77, 213–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochester IJ, Constable GA
(1996) Retain your cotton stubble—burning can reduce yields. Australian Cottongrower 17, 62–64.
Rochester IJ,
Constable GA, Saffigna PG
(1997) Retention of cotton stubble enhances N fertilizer recovery and lint yield of irrigated cotton. Soil & Tillage Research 41, 75–86.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochester IJ, Peoples MB
(2005) Growing vetches (Vicia villosa Roth.) in irrigated cotton systems: inputs of fixed N, N fertiliser savings and cotton productivity. Plant and Soil 271, 251–264.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochester IJ,
Peoples MB,
Constable GA, Gault RR
(1998) Faba beans and other legumes add nitrogen to irrigated cotton cropping systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 253–260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochester IJ,
Peoples MB,
Hulugalle NR,
Gault RR, Constable GA
(2001) Using legumes to enhance N fertility and improve soil condition in cotton cropping systems. Field Crops Research 70, 27–41.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Six J,
Conant RT,
Paul EA, Paustian K
(2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil 241, 155–176.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Skjemstad JO,
Catchpoole VR, Le Feuvre RP
(1994) Carbon dynamics in Vertisols under several crops as assessed by natural abundance of 13C. Australian Journal of Soil Research 32, 311–321.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Skjemstad JO, Dalal RC
(1987) Spectroscopic and chemical differences in Vertisols subjected to long periods of cultivation. Australian Journal of Soil Research 25, 323–335.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scott F, Hulugalle N
(2007) Rotations and permanent beds to fight the cotton cost-price squeeze. Australian Cottongrower 28, 41–45.
Thomas GA,
Titmarsh GW,
Freebairn DM, Radford BJ
(2007) No-tillage and conservation farming practices in grain growing areas of Queensland—a review of 40 years of development. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 887–898.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tisdall JM,
Smith SE, Rengasamy P
(1997) Aggregation of soil by fungal hyphae. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 55–60.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
deVoil P,
Rossing WAH, Hammer GL
(2006) Exploring profit—Sustainability trade-offs in cropping systems using evolutionary algorithms. Environmental Modelling & Software 21, 1368–1374.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker SR,
Taylor IN,
Milne G,
Osten VA,
Hoque Z, Farquharson RW
(2005) A survey of management and economic impact of weeds in dryland cotton cropping systems of sub-tropical Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 79–91.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams E,
Rochester I, Constable G
(2005) Using legumes to maximise profits in cotton systems. Australian Cottongrower 26, 43–46.