Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A comparison of some surface soil phosphorus tests that could be used to assess P export potential

David Nash A D , Murray Hannah A , Kirsten Barlow B , Fiona Robertson C , Nicole Mathers A , Craig Butler A and Jessie Horton A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, Ellinbank Centre, 1301 Hazeldean Rd, Ellinbank, Victoria 3821, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, Rutherglen Centre, RMB 1145, Chiltern Valley Road, Rutherglen, Victoria 3685, Australia.

C Department of Primary Industries, Hamilton Centre, Private Bag 105, Hamilton, Victoria 3300, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: David.Nash@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(5) 397-400 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR06142
Submitted: 10 October 2006  Accepted: 17 July 2007   Published: 16 August 2007

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) exports from agricultural land are a problem world-wide and soil tests are often used to identify high risk areas. A recent study investigated changes in soil (0–20 mm), soil water and overland flow in 4 recently laser-graded (<1 year) and 4 established (laser-graded >10 years) irrigated pastures in south-eastern Australia before and after 3 years of irrigated dairy production. We use the results from that study to briefly examine the relationships between a series of ‘agronomic’ (Olsen P, Colwell P), environmental (water-extractable P, calcium chloride extractable P, P sorption saturation, and P sorption), and other (total P, organic P) soil P tests.

Of the 2 ‘agronomic’ soil P tests, Colwell P explained 91% of the variation in Olsen P, and Colwell P was better correlated with the other soil tests. With the exception of P sorption, all soil P tests explained 57% or more of the total variation in Colwell P, while they explained 61% or less of Olsen P possibly due to the importance of organic P in this soil. Variations in total P were best explained by the organic P (85%), Calcium chloride extractable P (83%), water-extractable P (78%), and P sorption saturation (76%). None of the tests adequately predicted the variation in P sorption at 5 mg P/L equilibrating solution concentration.

The results of this limited study highlight the variability between soil P tests that may be used to estimate P loss potential. Moreover, these results suggest that empirical relationships between specific soil P tests and P export potential will have limited resolution where different soil tests are used, as the errors in the relationship between soil test P and P loss potential are compounded by between test variation. We conclude that broader study is needed to determine the relationships between soil P tests for Australian soils, and based on that study a standard protocol for assessing the potential for P loss should be developed.

Additional keywords: cultivation, soil P test, laser graded, phosphorus, surface soil.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Victorian Department of Primary Industries, GippsDairy and Dairy Australia who funded this project. The authors also acknowledge the Macalister Research Farm Co-operative Ltd on whose farm the trials were undertaken and Prof. Aldo Bagnara and Dr Roger Armstrong for their comments on the manuscript.


References


Ahuja LR, Lehman OR (1983) The extent and nature of rainfall soil interaction in the release of soluble chemicals to runoff. Journal of Environmental Quality 12, 34–40. open url image1

Barlow K, Nash D, Grayson R (2005) Phosphorus export at the paddock, farm-section and whole farm scale on an irrigated dairy farm in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Beck MA, Zelazny LW, Daniels WL, Mullins GL (2004) Using the Mehlich-1 extract to estimate soil phosphorus saturation for environmental risk assessment. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 1762–1771. open url image1

Coventry JL, Halliwell DJ, Nash DM (2001) The orthophosphate content of bicarbonate soil extracts. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 415–421.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

GenStat (2005) ‘GenStat for Windows. Release 8.1.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Heckrath G, Brookes PC, Poulton PR, Goulding KWT (1995) Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the Broadbalk Experiment. Journal of Environmental Quality 24, 904–910. open url image1

Hesketh N, Brookes PC (2000) Development of an indicator for risk of phosphorus leaching. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 105–110. open url image1

Isbell RF (1996) ‘Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

Kleinman PJA, Sharpley AN, Moyer BG, Elwinger GF (2002) Effect of mineral and manure phosphorus sources on runoff phosphorus. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 2026–2033.
PubMed |
open url image1

LaChat Instruments (1997) ‘Methods list for QuikChem automated analyzers.’ (Lachat Instruments: Milwaukee, WI)

Maguire RO, Sims JT (2002) Measuring agronomic and environmental soil phosphorus saturation and predicting phosphorus leaching with Mehlich 3. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 2033–2039. open url image1

McDowell RW, Sharpley AN (2001) Approximating phosphorus release from soils to surface runoff and subsurface drainage. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 508–520.
PubMed |
open url image1

Moody PW , Bolland MDA (1999) Phosphorus. In ‘Soils analysis: an interpretation manual’. (Eds KI Peverill, LA Sparrow, DJ Reuter) pp. 187–220. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31–36.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nair VD, Harris WG (2004) A capacity factor as an alternative to soil test phosphorus in phosphorus risk assessment. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 491–497. open url image1

Nash DM , Webb B , Hannah M , Adeloju S , Toifl M , Barlow K , Robertson F , Roddick F , Porter N (2007) Changes following grading of irrigation bays on nutrients in surface soil and water and overland flow. Soil Use and Management (In press).

Northcote KH (1979) ‘A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils.’ 4th edn (Rellim Technical Publications: Adelaide, S. Aust.)

Pautler MC, Sims JT (2000) Relationships between soil test phosphorus soluble phosphorus and phosphorus saturation in Delaware soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 765–773. open url image1

Pote DH, Daniel TC, Nichols DJ, Sharpley AN, Moore PA, Miller DM, Edwards DR (1999) Relationship between phosphorus levels in three ultisols and phosphorus concentrations in runoff. Journal of Environmental Quality 28, 170–175. open url image1

Pote DH, Daniel TC, Sharpley AN, Moore PA, Edwards DR, Nichols DJ (1996) Relating extractable soil phosphorus to phosphorus losses in runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 855–859. open url image1

Rayment GE , Higginson FR (1992) ‘Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods.’ (Inkata Press: Melbourne, Vic.)

Schroeder PD, Radcliffe DE, Cabrera ML, Belew CD (2004) Relationship between soil test phosphorus and phosphorus in runoff: effects of soil series variability. Journal of Environmental Quality 33, 1452–1463.
PubMed |
open url image1

Sims JT (1993) Environmental soil testing for phosphorus. Journal of Productive Agriculture 6, 501–507. open url image1

Sims JT (1998) ‘Soil testing for phosphorus: environmental uses and implications.’ 389. (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences: Newark, DE)

Sims JT, Edwards AC, Schoumans OF, Simard RR (2000) Integrating soil phosphorus testing into environmentally based agricultural management practices. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 60–71. open url image1

Sims JT, Maguire RO, Leytem AB, Gartley KL, Pautler MC (2002) Evaluation of Mehlich 3 as an agri-environmental soil phosphorus test for the Mid-Atlantic United States of America. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 2016–2032. open url image1

United States Department of Agriculture (1998) ‘Keys to soil taxonomy.’ 8th edn (United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC)