Decomposition of sugarcane harvest residue in different climatic zones
Fiona A. Robertson A and Peter J. Thorburn BA Corresponding author. BSES Ltd, and CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production, 50 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia. Present address: Department of Primary Industries, PIRVic., Private Bag 105, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia. Email: fiona.robertson@dpi.vic.gov.au
B CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(1) 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR06079
Submitted: 3 July 2006 Accepted: 11 December 2006 Published: 14 February 2007
Abstract
Sugarcane in Australia is increasingly grown under the green cane trash blanket system where harvest residues (trash) are retained on the soil surface instead of being burnt. This is considered a more sustainable system, but relatively little is known about its effects on soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N). As part of a study to understand the effects of trash retention on soil C and N dynamics, we measured the composition and decomposition of sugarcane trash in terms of dry matter (DM), C, and N in 5 field experiments in contrasting climatic conditions in Queensland and New South Wales.
The trash from newly harvested sugarcane contained large quantities of DM (7–12 t/ha) and C (3–5 t/ha), which could be estimated from cane yield, and significant quantities of N (28–54 kg/ha), which could not be predicted from cane yield. Trash quality was low (C : N ratio >70) and it took a year for most of the trash to decompose. Cumulative thermal time was the variable most closely associated with cumulative DM and C decomposition. Variation in the rate of trash DM and C decomposition between sampling dates was partially related to temperature and rainfall at 2 of the 3 sites, but was considered to be influenced by other factors (such as soil, trash, and management) as much as by climate. There were 2 phases of decomposition: an early phase when C : N ratios were high and variable and net N loss or gain was not related to C loss; and a late phase when C : N ratios were much lower and similar across experiments and net N loss was related to C loss. The rate of N loss from trash during the first 12 months was slow (1–5 kg/month), which would have been of little immediate significance for plant growth. The potential value of trash for soil N supply lies in cumulative effects over the medium–long term.
Additional keywords: carbon, nitrogen, mass loss, C : N ratio.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Graham Kingston, Alan Hurney, and Les Chapman for allowing this study to be superimposed on their field experiments and providing supporting data. Thank you to Kaylene Harris, Ruth Mitchell, Kylee Sankowsky, Patricia Nelson, and Jody Biggs for assistance with the field and laboratory work. Also thank you to Murray Hannah for advice on statistical analyses. We acknowledge funding from the Australian Government and Sugarcane Industry through the CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production, BSES Ltd, and the Sugar Research and Development Corporation.
Amato M,
Ladd JN,
Ellington A,
Ford G,
Mahoney JE,
Taylor AC, Walsgott D
(1987) Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. IV. Decomposition in situ of 14C- and 15N-labelled legume and wheat materials in a range of southern Australian soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 25, 95–105.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buyanovsky GA, Wagner GH
(1986) Post-harvest residue input to cropland. Plant and Soil 93, 57–65.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman LS,
Haysom MBC, Saffigna PG
(1992) N cycling in cane fields from 15N labelled trash and residual fertiliser. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 14, 84–89.
Chapman LS,
Haysom MBC, Saffigna PG
(1994) The recovery of 15N from labelled urea fertilizer in crop components of sugarcane. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1577–1585.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christensen BT
(1985) Wheat and barley straw decomposition under field conditions: effect of soil type and plant cover on weight loss, nitrogen and potassium content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17, 691–697.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Curtin D, Fraser PM
(2003) Soil organic matter as influenced by straw management practices and inclusion of grass and clover seed crops in cereal rotations. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 95–106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Douglas CL, Rickman RW
(1992) Estimating crop residue decomposition from air temperature, initial nitrogen content, and residue placement. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 272–278.
Frey SD,
Elliott ET,
Paustian K, Peterson GA
(2000) Fungal translocation as a mechanism for soil nitrogen inputs to surface residue decomposition in a no-tillage agroecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 689–698.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jensen ES
(1997) Nitrogen immobilization and mineralization during initial decomposition of 15N-labelled pea and barley residues. Biology and Fertility of Soils 24, 39–44.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Magid J,
De Neergaard A, Brandt M
(2006) Heterogeneous distribution may substantially decrease initial decomposition, long-term microbial growth and N-immobilization from high C-to-N ratio resources. European Journal of Soil Science 57, 517–529.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mitchell RDJ, Larsen P
(2000) A simple method for estimating the return of nutrients in sugarcane trash. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 22, 212–216.
Mitchell RDJ,
Thorburn PJ, Larsen P
(2000) Quantifying the loss of nutrients from the immediate area when sugarcane residues are burnt. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 22, 206–211.
Myers RJK
(1983) The effect of plant residues on plant uptake and leaching of soil and fertilizer nitrogen in a tropical red earth. Fertilizer Research 4, 249–260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ng Kee Kwong KF,
Deville J,
Cavalot PC, Riviere V
(1987) Value of cane trash in nitrogen nutrition of sugarcane. Plant and Soil 102, 79–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prove BG,
Doogan VJ, Truong PNV
(1995) Nature and magnitude of soil erosion in sugarcane land on the wet tropical coast of north-eastern Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 641–649.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson FA, Thorburn PJ
(2007) Management of sugarcane harvest residues: consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 13–23.
Spain AV, Hodgen MJ
(1994) Changes in the composition of sugarcane harvest residues during decomposition as a surface mulch. Biology and Fertility of Soils 17, 225–231.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stott DE,
Elliot LF,
Papendick RI, Campbell GS
(1986) Low temperature or low water potential effects on the microbial decomposition of wheat residue. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 18, 577–582.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorburn PJ,
Probert ME, Robertson FA
(2001) Modelling decomposition of sugar cane surface residues with APSIM-Residue. Field Crops Research 70, 223–232.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanlauwe B,
Vanlangenhove G,
Merckx R, Vlassak K
(1995) Impact of rainfall regime on the decomposition of leaf litter with contrasting quality under subhumid tropical conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 20, 8–16.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wood AW
(1991) Management of crop residues following green harvesting of sugarcane in north Queensland. Soil and Tillage Research 20, 69–85.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Young IM, Ritz K
(2000) Tillage, habitat space and function of soil microbes. Soil and Tillage Research 53, 201–213.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
