Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Organic matter increases jarosite dissolution in acid sulfate soils under inundation conditions

Chengxing Chu A , Chuxia Lin A B , Yonggui Wu A , Wenzhou Lu A and Jie Long A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

B Corresponding author. Email: cxlin@scau.edu.cn

Australian Journal of Soil Research 44(1) 11-16 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR05096
Submitted: 12 July 2005  Accepted: 31 October 2005   Published: 10 February 2006

Abstract

A column experiment was conducted to examine the effects of added organic matter and thickness of surface water on the stability of jarosite in a coastal acid sulfate soil. The results show that dissolution of jarosite was negligible if no organic matter was added onto the soil. However, where organic matter was added onto the soils, the acidity and the concentrations of iron and sulfate in the leachate of the soil increased following water inundation, indicating the decomposition of jarosite in such conditions. Probably, the organic matter content of the soil was originally too low to enable the creation of reducing conditions that could sufficiently cause the breakdown of jarosite contained in the soil. Under the experimental conditions, the amount of added organic matter played a more important role than the thickness of the overlying water in the dissolution of jarosite.

Additional keywords: jarosite, acid sulfate soil, inundation, organic matter, acidity.


Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 40471067). The authors would also like to thank Associate Professor Leigh Sullivan at the Southern Cross University and Associate Professor Zhang Jiaen at the South China Agricultural University for their assistances in the filed.


References


van Breemen, N (1973). ‘Soil forming processes in acid sulphate soils. Acid sulphate soils.’ ILRI Publication No. 18. pp. 66–128. (ILRI: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Dent, DL (1986). ‘Acid sulfate soil: a baseline for research and development.’ ILRI Publication No. 39. (ILRI: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Dent DL (1992) Remediation of acid sulfate soils. Advances in Soil Science 17, 79–122. open url image1

Johnston SG, Slavich P, Hirst P (2004) The acid flux dynamics of two artificial drains in acid sulfate soil backswamps on the Clarence River floodplain, Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 623–637.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Le Quang Tri, van Mensvoort MEF (2004) Decision trees for farm management on acid sulfate soils, Mekong Delta, Viet Nam. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 671–684.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Li H, Zhang X, Lu W, Liu Y, Li C (2002) Effects of different land use schemes on the chemical properties of acid sulfate soils. ‘Acid sulfate soils in Australia and China’. (Eds C Lin, MD Melville, LA Sullivan) pp. 111–116. (Science Press: Beijing)

Lin C, Bush RT, McConchie D (2001) Impeded acidification of acid sulfate soils in an intensively drained sugarcane land. Pedosphere 11, 209–216. open url image1

Lin C, Haskins PG, Lin J (2003) Factors controlling deoxygenation of “floodwater” overlying an acid sulfate soil: experimental modeling. Pedosphere 13, 323–330. open url image1

Lin C, Lancaster G, Sullivan LA, McConchie D, Saenger P (2002) Actual acidity in acid sulfate soils: chemical processes and analytical methods. ‘Acid sulfate soils in Australia and China’. (Eds C Lin, MD Melville, LA Sullivan) pp. 65–71. (Science Press: Beijing)

Lin C, Melville MD (1994) Acid sulfate soils-landscape relationships in the Pearl River Delta, southern China. CATENA 22, 105–120.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lin C, Melville MD, Islam MM, Wilson BP, Yang X, van Oploo P (1998) Chemical controls on acid discharges from acid sulfate soils under sugarcane cropping in an eastern Australian easturine floodplain. Environmental Pollution 103, 169–176.
Crossref |
open url image1

Lin C, Melville MD, White I, Hsu YP (1996) Comparison of three methods for estimation of the reduced-S content in estuarine sediments. The Science of the Total Environment 187, 1–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lin C, O’Brien K, Lancaster G, Sullivan LA, McConchie D (2000) An improved analytical procedure for determination of actual acidity in acid sulfate soils. The Science of the Total Environment 262, 57–61.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lin C, Wood M, Haskins P, Ryfel T, Lin J (2004) Controls on water acidification and de-oxygenation in an estuarine waterway, eastern Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 61, 55–63.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. ‘Methods of soil analysis (Part 2)’. 2nd edn, Agron. 9 (Ed. AL Page) pp. 539–579. (ASA, SSSA: Madison, WI)

Rhoades JD (1982) Soluble salts. ‘Methods of soil analysis (Part 2)’. 2nd edn, Agron. 9(2) (Ed. AL Page) pp. 167–169. (ASA, SSSA: Madison, WI)

Smith RJ, Yerbury R (1996) Seven Oaks ASS management demonstration sites. ‘Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Acid Sulfate Soils’. (Ed.  RJ Smith , HJ Smith ) pp. 170–171. (Robert J. Smith S Associates and ASSMAC: Wollongbar, NSW)


Sullivan LA, Ward NJ, Bush RT, Lin C (2002) Evaluation of approaches to the chemical analysis of acid sulfate soil. ‘Acid sulfate soils in Australia and China’. (Eds C Lin, MD Melville, LA Sullivan) pp. 72–82. (Science Press: Beijing)

Wang J, Luo S (2002) Sulfur and its acidity in acid sulfate soils in the Taishan coastal plain, southern China. ‘Acid sulfate soils in Australia and China’. (Eds C Lin, MD Melville, LA Sullivan) pp. 143–152. (Science Press: Beijing)

Ward NJ, Sullivan LA, Bush RT (2004) Soil pH, oxygen availability, and the rate of sulfide oxidation in acid sulfate soil materials: implications for environmental hazard assessment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 509–514.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1