Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nutrient leaching and changes in soil characteristics of four contrasting soils irrigated with secondary-treated municipal wastewater for four years

G. P. Sparling A E , L. Barton B , L. Duncan A , A. McGill A , T. W. Speir D , L. A. Schipper A , G. Arnold C and A. Van Schaik D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand.

B School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

D ESR, PO Box 50 348, Porirua, New Zealand.

E Corresponding author. Email: sparlingg@landcareresearch.co.nz

Australian Journal of Soil Research 44(2) 107-116 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR05084
Submitted: 24 June 2005  Accepted: 16 December 2005   Published: 27 March 2006

Abstract

Land treatment is the preferred option for the disposal of wastewater in New Zealand. We applied secondary-treated municipal wastewater to 4 contrasting soils (a Gley, Pumice, Recent, and Allophanic Soil) at the rate of 50 mm per week, for 4 years. Amounts of N and P in applied wastewater, leachates, and removed in herbage were measured every 1–4 weeks, and a range of soil chemical, biochemical and physical characteristics measured by destructive sampling after 2 and 4 years. After 4 years, leaching losses amounted to 290–307 kg N on the Gley and Recent Soils, representing approximately 22% of the N applied. Leaching losses from the Allophanic and Pumice Soils were 44 and 69 kg N/ha, respectively, representing <5% of that applied. More than half of the N leached was in organic forms. Leaching losses of P were <5 kg P/ha on the Pumice and Allophanic Soils (< 1% of that applied), 41 kg P/ha from the Recent Soil and 65 kg P/ha from the Gley Soil (8% and 13% of that applied, respectively). After 4 years, the total C and microbial C content in the A horizon of the irrigated Recent Soil were, respectively, 47% and 44% less than non-irrigated cores. All irrigated soils showed a rise in pH of up to 1 unit, and all had a marked increase in the exchangeable Na+ which reached 4–22% ESP. After 4 years, the saturated and near saturated hydraulic conductivity of the Gley Soil had declined from 567 and 40 mm/h to 56 and 3 mm/h, respectively. Allophanic and Pumice Soils are to be preferred over the Recent and Gley Soils for effective treatment of wastewater and to minimise the loss of nutrients to the wider environment.

Additional keywords: effluent, land treatment, leachate, soil, wastewater treatment.


Acknowledgments

We thank Waipa District Council for permission to conduct the field trial at their site, and Environment Waikato for financial assistance during the establishment of the trial. Additional technical support was provided by students from the University of Waikato. Science staff from AgResearch, Ruakura and Lincoln Environmental, Hamilton, provided advice on pasture management and irrigation. The New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology provided funding under contracts C09802, C09X0217, and C09X0304.


References


Aislabie J, Smith JJ, Fraser R, McLeod M (2001) Leaching of bacterial indicators of faecal contamination through four New Zealand soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 1397–1406.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Barton L, McLay CDA, Schipper LAS, Smith CT (1999 ) Annual denitrification rates in agricultural and forest soils: A review. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 1073–1093.
Crossref |
open url image1

Barton L, Schipper LA, Barkle GF, McLeod M, Speir TW, Taylor MD, McGill AC, van Schaik AP, Fitzgerald NB, Pandey SP (2005 ) Land application of domestic effluent onto four soil types: plant uptake and nutrient leaching. Journal of Environmental Quality 34, 635–643.
PubMed |
open url image1

Cameron KC, Di HJ, McLaren RG (1997 ) Is soil an appropriate dumping ground for our wastes? Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 995–1035.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cameron KC, Smith NP, McLay CDA, Fraser PM, McPherson RJ, Harrison RJ, Harbottle P (1992 ) Lysimeters without edge flow: an improved design and sampling procedure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 1625–1628. open url image1

Degens BP, Schipper LA, Claydon JJ, Russell JM, Yeates GW (2000 ) Irrigation of an allophanic soil with dairy factory effluent for 22 years: responses of nutrient storage and soil biota. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 25–35.
Crossref |
open url image1

Haynes AR, Mancino CF, Pepper IL (1990 ) Irrigation of turfgrass with secondary effluent 1. Soil and leachate water quality. Agronomy Journal 82, 939–943. open url image1

Hewitt, AE (1998 ). ‘New Zealand Soil Classification.’ . (Landcare Research New Zealand, Ltd: Lincoln, New Zealand)

McLeod M, Schipper LA, Taylor MD (1998) Preferential flow in well drained and poorly drained soils under different overhead irrigation regimes. Soil Use Management 14, 96–100. open url image1

McLeod M, Aislabie J, Smith J, Fraser R, Roberts A, Taylor M (2001) Viral and chemical tracer movement through contrasting soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 2134–2140.
PubMed |
open url image1

Menneer JC, McLay CDA, Lee R (2001) Effects of sodium-contaminated wastewater on soil permeability of two New Zealand soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 877–891.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Molloy, L (1988). ‘Soils in the New Zealand landscape. The living mantle.’ (Mallinson Rendell: Wellington, New Zealand)

Polglase PJ, Tompkins D, Steart LG, Falkiner RA (1999) Mineralization and leaching of nitrogen in an effluent irrigated pine plantation. Journal of Environmental Quality 24, 911–920. open url image1

Potts R, Ellwood B (2000) Sewage effluent characteristics. ‘New Zealand guidelines for utilisation of sewage effluent on land. Part 2: Issues for design and management’. (Eds LJ Whitehouse, C Wang, MD Tomer) pp. 1–20. (New Zealand Land Treatment Collective and Forest Research: Rotorua, New Zealand)

Rengasamy P (2002) Sodic soils, processes, characteristics and classification. ‘Encyclopedia of soil science’. (Ed. R Lal) pp. 1221–1223. (Marcel Dekker: Basel)

Saunders WMH (1968) Phosphorus. ‘Soils of New Zealand, Part 2. Ch. 7.7’. New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin No. 26(2) (Ed. AR Shearer) pp. 95–103. (Government Printer: Wellington, New Zealand)

Schipper LA, Williamson JC, Kettles HA, Speir TW (1996) Impact of land-applied tertiary-treated effluent on soil properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 25, 1073–1077. open url image1

Silva RG, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Hendry T (1999) A lysimeter study of the impact of cow urine, dairy shed effluent, and nitrogen fertiliser on nitrate leaching. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 357–369.
Crossref |
open url image1

Snow, VO , Bond, WJ , Smith, CJ ,  and  Falkiner, RA (1998). ‘Fate of salts in soils. Land application of agro-industrial wastes.’ New Zealand Land Treatment Collective Technical Review No. 17. (Blenheim NZLTC: Rotorua, New Zealand)

Soil Survey Staff (1996). ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 7th edn. USDA-NRCS. (US Government Print Office: Washington, DC)

Sparling GP, Ross DJ, Trustrum NA, Arnold G, West AW, Speir TW, Schipper LA (2003) Recovery of topsoil characteristics after landslip erosion in dry hill country of New Zealand, and a test of the space-for-time hypothesis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35, 1575–1586.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Speir TW (2002) Soil biochemical properties as indices of performance and sustainability of effluent irrigation systems in New Zealand—a review. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 32, 535–553. open url image1

Tomer MD, Charleson TH, Smith CT, Barton L, Thorn AJ, Gielen GJHP (2000) Evaluation of treatment performance and process after five years of wastewater application at Whakarewarewa forest New Zealand. ‘The forest alternative: principles and practices of residual use’. (Ed. CL Henry) pp. 155–162. (College of Forest Resources, University of Washington: Seattle, WA)

VSN International (2002). ‘Genstat.’ 6th edn. Version 6.2.0.325. (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Wardle DA (1998) Controls of temporal variability of the soil microbial biomass – a global-scale synthesis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 1627–1637.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1