Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR05039
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 43(8)

Microstructure and water retention of Oxisols in Thailand

S. Tawornpruek A , I. Kheoruenromne A C , A. Suddhiprakarn A and R. J. Gilkes B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

B School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: irbs@ku.ac.th

Australian Journal of Soil Research 43(8) 973-986 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR05039
Submitted: 29 March 2005  Accepted: 15 August 2005   Published: 8 December 2005

Abstract

The moisture characteristics and related pore size distributions of Thai Oxisols were determined for 11 representative pedons. These soils are Kandiustox and Kandiudox located in the North-east Plateau, South-east Coast, and Peninsular Thailand. They are generally acidic (pH 5–6), clayey, have low cation exchange capacity (5–15 cmolc/kg) and have low bulk densities (0.77–1.36 Mg/m3). The microstructures of these soils are mostly granular with compound packing 10–1500 μm voids between aggregates. Water retention curves for all soils are similar with amounts of water retained at 33 kPa (field capacity) ranging from 22 to 43 (%weight) and 1500 kPa (permanent wilting point) ranging from 17 to 34%. Water available to plants is 3–12%. There is a strongly bimodal pore size distribution with the modal macropore and micropore diameters calculated from the soil moisture retention characteristic curves being about 100 μm and 0.02 μm. The pore size distribution determined by N2-BET method indicates a modal micropore of about 0.01 μm. The total volume of pores >5 μm estimated by image analysis of scanning electron micrographs ranges from 20 to 50% with most of the variation in porosity being due to large differences in macropore (>75 μm) volume.

Additional keywords: water retention curves, pore size distribution, image analysis, BET nitrogen sorption, scanning electron microscopy.


Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program of The Thailand Research Fund. We would like to thank Centre of Microscopy and Microanalysis, UWA for laboratory facilities and Mr Michael Smirk of UWA for assistance.


References


Aylmore LAG, Sills ID, Quirk JP (1970) Surface area of homoionic illite and montmorillonite clay minerals as measured by the sorption of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Clays and Clay Minerals 18, 91–96. open url image1

Beinroth FH, Eswaran H, Uehara G, Reich PE (2000) Oxisols. ‘Handbook of soil science’. (Ed. ME Sumner) pp. E373–E392. (CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL)

Bennema J, Jongerius A, Lemos RC (1970) Micromorphology of some oxic and argillic horizons in south brazil in relation to weathering sequences. Geoderma 4, 333–355.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bigham JM, Golden DC, Bowen LH, Buol SW, Weed SB (1978) Iron oxide mineralogy of well-drained Ultisols and Oxisols: II. Influence on color, surface area and phosphate retention. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 825–830. open url image1

Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. ‘Methods of soil analysis, part I. Physical and mineralogical methods’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 363–382. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Bruand A, Tessier D (2000) Water retention properties of the clay in soil developed on clayey sediments: significance of parent material and soil history. European Journal of Soil Science 51, 679–688.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bui EN, Mermut AR, Santos MCD (1989) Microscopic and ultramicroscopic porosity of an Oxisol as determined by image analysis and water retention. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53, 661–665. open url image1

Bullock, PN , Jongerius, FA , Stoops, G , Tursina, T ,  and  Babel, U (1985). ‘Handbook for soil thin section description.’ (Waine Research Publ.: England)

Buol SW, Eswaran H (1978) Micromorphology of Oxisols. ‘Soil micromorphology. Proceedings 5th International Meeting on Soil Micromorphology’. University of Granada, Spain. (Ed. M Delgado ) pp. 325–328.


Cady JG, Wilding LP, Drees LR (1986) Petrographic microscope techniques. ‘Methods of soil analysis, part I. Physical and mineralogical methods’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 185–218. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Chapman HD (1965) Cation exchange capacity. ‘Methods of soil analysis part II’. (Ed. CA Black) pp. 891–901. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Childs EC, Collis-George N (1950) The permeability of porous materials. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A 201, 392–405. open url image1

Chonglakmani, C , Bunopas, S , Charoenpravat, A , Nakinbodee, V , Nakornsri, N , Dheetadilok, P ,  and  Sarapirome, S (1983). ‘Geological map of Thailand 1 : 500 000.’ (Geological Survey Divison, Department of Mineral Resources: Bangkok, Thailand)

El-Swaify SA (1980) Physical and mechanical properties of Oxisols. ‘Soils with variable charge’. (Ed. BKG Theng) (New Zealand Society of Soil Science: Lower Hutt, New Zealand)

FAO (1998). ‘World reference base for soil resources.’ World Soil Resources Reports No. 84. (FAO: Rome)

Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. ‘Methods of soil analysis, part I. Physical and mineralogical methods’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 383–411. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Hart RD, Wiriyakitnateekul W, Gilkes RJ (2003) Properties of soil kaolins from Thailand. Clay Minerals 38, 71–94.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hein LRO (2001) Quantitative fractography by digital image processing: NIH image macro tools for stereo pair analysis and 3-D reconstruction. Journal of Microscopy 204, 17–28.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Holzhey CS, Kimble JM (1988) Constraints to the analytical classification of Oxisols. ‘Classification, characterization and utilization of Oxisols’. (Eds MN Camargo, JM Kimble, FH Beinroth) (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria: Rio de Janeiro)

Imhoff S, Silva APd, Dexter A (2002) Factors contributing to the tensile strength and friability of Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 1656–1661. open url image1

Jackson, ML (1965). ‘Soil chemical analysis: advanced course.’ (Department of Soils, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI)

Kämpf N, Scheinost AC, Schulze DG (2000) Oxide minerals. ‘Handbook of soil science’. (Ed. ME Sumner) (CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL)

Kheoruenromne, I (1999). ‘Soil survey laboratory manual.’ (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University: Bangkok)

Klute A (1986) Water retention: laboratory methods. ‘Methods of soil analysis, part I. Physical and mineralogical methods’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 635–662. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Larson WE, Padilla WA (1990) Physical properties of a Mollisol, an Oxisol and an Inceptisol. Soil and Tillage Research 16, 23–33.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Macedo J, Bryant RB (1987) Morphology, mineralogy, and genesis of a hydrosequence of Oxisols in Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 690–698. open url image1

Muggler CC, Buurman P (2000) Erosion, sedimentation and pedogenesis in a polygenetic Oxisol sequence in Minas Gerais, Brazil. CATENA 41, 3–17.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Muller JP (1983) Microorganizaton of loose ferralitic materials in the Cameroons. ‘Soil micromorphology. Proceedings 6th International Meeting on Soil Micromorphology’. London. (Ed.  PN Bullock , CP Murphy ) pp. 655–666. (AB Academic Publ.: Berkhamsted, UK)


National Soil Survey Center (1996). ‘Soil survey laboratory methods manual.’ (United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service)

Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. ‘Methods of soil analysis, part 3. Chemical methods’. (Eds DL Sparks, AL Page, PA Helmke, RH Loeppert, PN Soltanpour, MA Tabatabai, CT Johnston, ME Sumner) pp. 961–1010. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Neves CSVJ, Feller C, Guimaraes MF, Medina CC, Tavares Filho J, Fortier M (2003) Soil bulk density and porosity of homogeneous morphological units identified by the cropping profile method in clayey Oxisols in Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 71, 109–119. open url image1

O’Brien FEM (1948) The control of humidity by saturated salt solutions. Journal of Scientific Instruments 25, 73–76.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Paramananthan S, Eswaran H (1980) Morphological properties of Oxisols. ‘Soils with variable charge’. (Ed. BKG Theng) pp. 35–43. (New Zealand Society of Soil Science: Lower Hutt, New Zealand)

Sanchez, PA (1976). ‘Properties and management of soils in the tropics.’ (John Wiley: New York)

Santos MCD, Mermut AR, Ribeiro MR (1989) Submicroscopy of clay microaggregates in an Oxisol from Pernambuco, Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53, 1895–1901. open url image1

Schaefer CER (2001) Brazilian latosols and their B horizon microstructure as long-term biotic constructs. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 909–926.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schaefer CER, Ker JC, Gilkes RJ, Campos JC, Costa LMd, Saadi A (2002) Pedogenesis on the uplands of the Diamantina Plateau, Minas Gerais, Brazil: a chemical and micropedological study. Geoderma 107, 243–269.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schnitzer M (1986) Binding of humic substances by soil mineral colloids. ‘Interactions of soil minerals with natural organics and microprobes’. (Eds PM Huang, M Schnitzer) pp. 77–101. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Schoeneberger, PJ , Wysocki, DA , Benham, EC ,  and  Broderson, WD (2002). ‘Field book for describing and sampling soils, version 2.0.’ (Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center: Lincoln, NE)

Schwertmann U (1993) Relations between iron oxides, soil color, and soil formation. ‘Soil color’. (Eds JM Bigham, EJ Ciolkosz) pp. 51–69. (Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI)

Sharma ML, Uehara G (1968) Influence of soil structure in water relations in a low humic latosol: I. Water retention. Soil Science Society of America Journal 32, 765–770. open url image1

Soil Science Society of America (1997). ‘Glossary of soil science terms.’ (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Soil Survey and Classification Division (1999a). ‘Established Soil Series in the Northeast of Thailand reclassified according to Soil Taxonomy 1998.’ Scientific Document No. 446. a. (Land Development Department, Thailand: Bangkok)

Soil Survey and Classification Division (1999b). ‘Established Soil Series in the Peninsular and the Southeast Coast of Thailand Reclassified according to Soil Taxonomy 1998.’ Scientific Document No. 448. b. (Land Development Department, Thailand: Bangkok)

Soil Survey Staff (1993). ‘Soil survey manual.’ (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)

Soil Survey Staff (1999). ‘Soil Taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys.’ (USDA-NRCS. US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC)

Tsuji GY, Watanabe RT, Sakai WS (1975) Influence of soil microstructure on water characteristics of selected Hawaiian soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 39, 28–33. open url image1

van den Berg M, Klamt E, Reeuwijk LPv, Sombroek WG (1997) Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils. Geoderma 78, 161–180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1