Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR04176
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 44(3)

Changes in soil water repellence and its distribution in relation to surface microtopographic units after a low severity fire in eucalypt woodland, Sydney, Australia

Jocelyn Howell A B , Geoff S. Humphreys A and Peter B. Mitchell A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Physical Geography, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: jhowell@cat.org.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 44(3) 205-217 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04176
Submitted: 9 December 2004  Accepted: 2 February 2006   Published: 5 May 2006

Abstract

The distribution and persistence of water repellence was altered by low severity fire and subsequent rain in soil supporting eucalypt woodland on sandstone terrain in Sydney, south-eastern Australia. Water drop penetration times were recorded to depths of 0.08 m in situ 9 months before the experimental fire, immediately after fire, 4 weeks later when rainfall had modified the soil surface but the soil was dry, and 5 weeks after the fire when the soil was moist. Spatial variation in water repellence was high in all cases except immediately after the fire, when soil was almost uniformly strongly repellent to 0.03 m depth, and less uniformly repellent at 0.04–0.06 m depth. Heavy rain moved litter, ash, and mineral soil, modifying the soil surface into microtopographic units including litter dams, microterraces, and other areas with differing proportions of litter, bare soil, and gravel. Post-rain water drop penetration measurements were taken on and beneath these different surface conditions, in order to investigate the possible contribution of water repellence to the formation and maintenance of litter dams and microterraces characteristic of this terrain after fire. Water repellence did not appear to be directly correlated with the presence or absence of surface litter. Results suggest the long-term and spatially variable water repellence found in soils associated with vegetation dominated by eucalypts in Australia is maintained by factors different from those causing extreme and uniform water repellence after fire. Variable water repellence at the soil surface and within the profile may contribute to differential survival of seedlings after fire. The possible breakdown of water repellent compounds formed after fire and the distribution and development of hydrophobic biotic structures including fungal hyphae and proteoid roots need to be investigated.

Additional keywords: hydrophobicity, litter, litter dam, microterrace, mycorrhiza, proteoid root mats.


Acknowledgments

We thank Stefan Doerr for guidance on data analysis, Lesley Hughes for organising the experimental fire, officers of the Metropolitan Fire Brigade for conducting the fire, Tony Auld and Ross Bradstock for soil temperature data, Malcolm Reed for extensive field assistance, Matthew Arnison for technical help, and Doug Benson and Brett Summerell for support at a vital time.


References


Ashton DH (1976) Studies on the mycorrhizae of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. Australian Journal of Botany 24, 723–741.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Atwell BJ , Kriedeman PE , Turnbull CGN (Eds) (1999) ‘Plants in action: Adaptation in nature, performance in cultivation.’ (Macmillan Publishers Australia: South Yarra, Vic.)

Auld TD (1986) Population dynamics of the shrub Acacia suaveolens (Sm.) Willd. Fire and the transition to seedlings. Australian Journal of Ecology 11, 373–386. open url image1

Auld TD, O’Connell MA (1991) Predicting patterns of post-fire germination in 35 eastern Australian Fabaceae. Australian Journal of Ecology 16, 53–70. open url image1

Beadle NCW (1940) Soil temperatures during forest fires and their effect on the survival of vegetation. Journal of Ecology 28, 180–192. open url image1

Bellgard SE (1991) Mycorrhizal associations of plant species in Hawkesbury Sandstone vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany 39, 357–364.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Benson D , Howell J (1990) Sydney’s vegetation 1788–1988: utilization, degradation and rehabilitation. In ‘Australian ecosystems: 200 years of utilization, degradation and reconstruction. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia’. Vol 16. (Eds DA Saunders, AJM Hopkins, RA How) pp. 115–127. (Surrey Beatty & Sons: Chipping Norton)

Benson D, Howell J (1994) The natural vegetation of the Sydney 1 : 100 000 map sheet. Cunninghamia 3, 677–787. open url image1

Benson D , Howell J , McDougall L (1996) ‘Mountain devil to mangrove: A guide to natural vegetation in the Hawkesbury-Nepean catchment.’ (Royal Botanic Gardens: Sydney)

Berg RY (1975) Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Australian Journal of Botany 23, 475–508.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bond RD (1964) The influence of the microflora on the physical properties of soils. II. Field studies on water-repellent sands. Australian Journal of Soil Research 2, 123–131.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bond RD, Harris JR (1964) The influence of the microflora on physical properties of soils. I. Effects associated with filamentous algae and fungi. Australian Journal of Soil Research 2, 111–122.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bradstock RA, Auld TD (1995) Soil temperatures during experimental bushfires in relation to fire intensity: consequences for legume germination and fire management in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 32, 76–84. open url image1

Brundrett MC, Abbott LK (1991) Roots of jarrah forest plants. I. Mycorrhizal associations of shrubs and herbaceous plants. Australian Journal of Botany 39, 445–457.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burch GJ, Moore ID, Burns J (1989) Soil hydrophobic effects on infiltration and catchment runoff. Hydrological Processes 3, 211–222. open url image1

Chapman GA , Murphy CL (1989) ‘Soil landscapes of the Sydney 1 : 100 000 sheet.’ (Soil Conservation Service of NSW: Sydney)

Chilvers GA (1968) Some distinctive types of eucalypt mycorrhiza. Australian Journal of Botany 16, 49–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chilvers GA, Pryor LD (1965) The structure of eucalypt mycorrhizas. Australian Journal of Botany 13, 245–259. open url image1

Claridge AW, Robinson AP, Tanton MT, Cunningham RB (1993) Seasonal production of hypogeal fungal sporocarps in a mixed-species eucalypt forest stand in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 41, 145–167.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Crockford H, Topalidis S, Richardson DP (1991) Water repellency in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest—measurements and processes. Hydrological Processes 5, 405–420. open url image1

DeBano LF (1981) Water Repellent Soils: a state-of-the-art. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-46, Berkeley, California.

DeBano LF (2000) Water repellency in soils: a historical overview. Journal of Hydrology 231–232, 4–32.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dekker LW, Oostindie K, Ritsema CJ (2005) Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research 43, 403–441.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Wendroth O, Jarvis N, Oostindie K, Pohl W, Larsson M, Gaudet J-P (1999) Moisture distributions and wetting rates of soils at experimental fields in the Netherlands, France, Sweden and Germany. Journal of Hydrology 215, 4–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Doerr SH, Blake WH, Shakesby RA, Stagnitti F, Vuurens SH, Humphreys GS, Wallbrink P (2004) Heating effects on water repellency in Australian eucalypt forest soils and their value in estimating wildfire soil temperatures. International Journal of Wildland Fire 13, 157–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Doerr SH, Ferreira AJD, Walsh RPD, Shakesby RA, Leighton-Boyce G, Coelho COA (2003) Soil water repellency as a potential parameter in rainfall-runoff modelling: experimental evidence at point to catchment scales from Portugal. Hydrological Processes 17, 363–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (1996) Soil hydrophobicity variations with depth and particle size fraction in burned and unburned Eucalyptus globulus and Pinus pinaster forest terrain in the Agueda Basin, Portugal. CATENA 27, 25–47.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (1998) Spatial variability of soil hydrophobicity in fire-prone eucalyptus and pine forests, Portugal. Soil Science 163, 313–324.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews 51, 33–65.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Eddy J, Humphreys GS, Hart DM, Mitchell PB, Fanning PC (1999) Vegetation arcs and litter dams: similarities and differences. CATENA 37, 57–73.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gould SF (1998a) Proteoid root mats bind surface materials in Hawkesbury Sandstone biomantles. Australian Journal of Soil Research 36, 1019–1031.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gould SF (1998b) Proteoid root mats stablilise Hawkesbury Sandstone biomantles following fire. Australian Journal of Soil Research 36, 1033–1043.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hendrickx JMH, Dekker LW, Boersma OH (1993) Unstable wetting fronts in water repellent field soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 22, 109–118. open url image1

Hughes L, Westoby M (1990) Removal rates of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology 71, 138–148. open url image1

Isbell RF (1996) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

Letey J (2001) Causes and consequences of fire-induced soil water repellency. Hydrological Processes 15, 2867–2875.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Letey J, Carrillo MLK, Pang XP (2000) Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology 231–232, 61–65.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Malajczuk N, Hingston FJ (1981) Ectomycorrhizae associated with Jarrah. Australian Journal of Botany 29, 453–462.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mitchell PB, Humphreys GS (1987) Litter dams and microterraces formed on hillslopes subject to rainwash in the Sydney Basin, Australia. Geoderma 39, 331–357.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morrison DA (2002) Effects of fire intensity on plant species composition of sandstone communities in the Sydney region. Austral Ecology 27, 433–441.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mullette KJ, Hannon NJ, Elliot AGL (1974) Insoluble phosphorus usage by Eucalyptus. Plant and Soil 41, 199–205.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Reddell P, Malajczuk N (1984) Formation of mycorrhizae by Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Smith) in litter and soil. Australian Journal of Botany 32, 511–520.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Reed ML (1996) Diversity of mycorrhizal fungi in the roots of epacrids. In ‘Gondwanan heritage: Past, present and future of the Western Australian biota’. (Eds SD Hopper, JA Chappill, MS Harvey, AS George) pp. 309–313. (Surrey Beatty and Sons: Sydney)

Rice B, Westoby M (1981) Myrmecochory in sclerophyll vegetation of the West Head, N.S.W. Australian Journal of Ecology 6, 291–298. open url image1

Scott DF (2000) Soil wettability in forested catchments in South Africa, as measured by different methods and as affected by vegetation cover and soil characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 231–232, 87–104.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shakesby RA, Chafer CJ, Doerr SH, Blake WH, Wallbrink P, Humphreys GS, Harrington BA (2003) Fire severity, water repellency characteristics and hydrogeomorphological changes following the Christmas 2001 Sydney forest fires. Australian Geographer 34, 147–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Soil Survey Staff (1998) ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 8th edn (US Dept Agriculture: Washington, DC)

Sun Y-P, Unestam T, Lucas SD, Johanson KJ, Kenne L, Finlay R (1999) Exudation-reabsorption in a mycorrhizal fungus, the dynamic interface for interaction with soil and soil microorganisms. Mycorrhiza 9, 137–144.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Taylor RJ (1991) Plants, fungi and bettongs: a fire-dependent co-evolutionary relationship. Australian Journal of Ecology 16, 409–411. open url image1

Unestam T (1991) Water repellency, mat formation, and leaf-stimulated growth of some ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 1, 13–20.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Westoby M, Rice B, Howell J (1990) Seed size and plant growth form as factors in dispersal spectra. Ecology 71, 1307–1315. open url image1

WRB (1998) ‘World Reference Base for soil resources.’ (FAO: Rome)










Appendix table 1. Soil water repellence (median and range of WR classes spanned) as measured by WDPT in situ to 0.08 m depth in long unburnt pre-fire and undifferentiated post-fire soil
WR Classes as in Table 3; N, sample size
A1


Appendix table 2. Soil water repellence (median WR class and range of classes spanned) as measured by WDPT in situ to 0.08 m depth under 6 microtopographic units (MTUs) in dry post-fire soil differentiated by rain
WR Classes as in Table 3; MTUs as in Table 4; N, sample size
A2


Appendix table 3 Soil water repellence (median WR class and range of classes spanned) as measured by WDPT in situ to 0.08 m depth under 6 microtopographic units (MTUs) in wet post-fire soil differentiated by rain
WR Classes as in Table 3; MTUs as in Table 4; N, sample size
A3