Register      Login
Australian Systematic Botany Australian Systematic Botany Society
Taxonomy, biogeography and evolution of plants

Just Accepted

This article has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. It is in production and has not been edited, so may differ from the final published form.

The Genomics for Australian Plants (GAP) framework initiative – developing genomic resources for understanding the evolution and conservation of the Australian flora.

Lalita Simpson, David Cantrill, Margaret Byrne, Theodore Allnutt, Graham King, Mabel Lum, Ziad Al Bkhetan, Rose Andrew, William Baker, Matthew Barrett 0000-0002-2926-4291, Jacqueline Batley, Oliver Berry, Rachel Binks, Jason Bragg, Linda Broadhurst, Gillian Brown, Jeremy Bruhl 0000-0001-9112-4436, Richard Edwards, Scott Ferguson 0000-0002-4821-7490, Felix Forest, Ove Gustafsson, Timothy Hammer 0000-0003-3816-7933, Gareth Holmes 0000-0003-1120-8731, Christopher Jackson, Liz James, Ashley Jones 0000-0002-7368-1666, Paul Kersey, Ilia Leitch, Olivier Maurin, Todd McLay, Daniel Murphy, Katharina Nargar 0000-0002-0459-5991, Lars Nauheimer 0000-0002-2847-0966, Herve Sauquet, Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn 0000-0002-7402-8941, Kelly Shepherd, Anna Syme, Michelle Waycott 0000-0002-0822-0564, Trevor Wilson 0000-0002-9026-0521, Darren Crayn 0000-0001-6614-4216

Abstract

The generation and analysis of genome-scale data—genomics—is driving a rapid increase in plant biodiversity knowledge. However, the speed and complexity of technological advance in genomics presents challenges for its widescale use in evolutionary and conservation biology. Here, we introduce and describe a national-scale collaboration conceived to build genomic resources and capability for understanding the Australian flora: the Genomics for Australian Plants (GAP) Framework Initiative. We outline (a) the history of the project including the collaborative framework, partners, and funding; (b) GAP principles such as rigour in design, sample verification and documentation, data management, and data accessibility; and (c) the structure of the consortium and its four activity streams (reference genomes, phylogenomics, conservation genomics, and training), with the rationale and aims for each of them. We show, through discussion of its successes and challenges, the value of this multi-institutional consortium approach and the enablers, such as well-curated collections and national collaborative research infrastructure, all of which have led to a substantial increase in capacity and delivery of biodiversity knowledge outcomes.

SB24022  Accepted 13 March 2025

© CSIRO 2025

Committee on Publication Ethics