Register      Login
Australian Systematic Botany Australian Systematic Botany Society
Taxonomy, biogeography and evolution of plants

Just Accepted

This article has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. It is in production and has not been edited, so may differ from the final published form.

Navigating phylogenetic conflict and evolutionary inference in plants with target capture data

Elizabeth Joyce 0000-0001-8291-8058, Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn 0000-0002-7402-8941, Harvey Orel 0000-0001-7971-8709, Francis Nge 0000-0002-0361-8709, Benjamin Anderson, Timothy Hammer 0000-0003-3816-7933, Todd McLay

Abstract

Target capture has quickly become a preferred approach for plant systematic and evolutionary research, marking a step-change in the generation of data for phylogenetic inference. While this advancement has facilitated the resolution of many relationships, phylogenetic conflict continues to be reported, and often attributed to genome duplication, reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting or rapid speciation – common processes in plant evolution. The proliferation of methods for analysing target capture data in the presence of these processes can be overwhelming for many researchers, especially students. In this review, we break down the causes of conflict and guide researchers through a target capture bioinformatic workflow, with a particular focus on robust phylogenetic inference in the presence of conflict. Through the workflow, we highlight key considerations for reducing artefactual conflict, managing paralogs, and assessing conflict, and discuss current methods for investigating causes of conflict. While we draw from examples in the Australian flora, this review is broadly relevant for any researcher working with target capture data. We conclude that conflict is often inherent in plant phylogenetic research, and that although further methodological development is needed, target capture data can still provide unprecedented insight into the extraordinary evolutionary histories of plants when carefully analysed.

SB24011  Accepted 07 March 2025

© CSIRO 2025

Committee on Publication Ethics