Botanical capital
Endymion D. CooperAustralian Systematic Botany 29(3) i-ii https://doi.org/10.1071/SBv29n3_ED1
Published: 29 November 2016
The Australasian Systematic Botany Society held their 2015 annual conference, 29 November–3 December, in Canberra, Australia. The location, in the Australian national capital, inspired the conference title ‘Building Our Botanical Capital’. The conference featured talks and posters on a broad range of topics of interest to the society’s membership, from ‘Species delimitation, new species, and cryptic diversity’ to ‘Phylogenetics’, and from ‘Assembly and visualisation of morphological data’ to ‘Genomic data in plant systematics’. Of particular relevance to the conference theme were symposia on ‘Collections-based science’, ‘Integrated floras, eFloras, and online keys’, and ‘Decadal plan for Australasian biodiversity science’. The high quality of the conference stimulated the editors of Australian Systematic Botany to invite all presenters to contribute to this special issue dedicated to the conference.
Beyond an entertaining play on words, the conference theme prompted serious reflection on the status of systematic botany in our region. Invoking the language of economics, ‘Building Our Botanical Capital’, suggests a forward looking, investment-focused agenda. The conference highlighted the efforts of the society and its membership in building two forms of botanical capital; intellectual, or human, capital, and assets and infrastructure. As outlined by the society’s president in this issue (Crayn 2016), the Australasian Systematic Botany Society has always prioritised investing in the next generation of systematic botanists, and the society’s conferences showcase the energy, enthusiasm and high quality work of its student members. The conference awards two student prizes (sponsored by Australian Systematic Botany), one for best oral presentation (The Pauline Ladiges Prize) awarded to Ben Anderson for his work on Triodia (Anderson et al. 2016), and one for best poster (now called The Australian Systematic Botany Journal prize) awarded to Charles Foster for his work on the angiosperm evolutionary timescale (Foster et al. 2016a). Many high quality student talks lead to articles in Australian Systematic Botany (e.g. Foster et al. 2016b and Telford et al. 2016 in this issue; and Weber and Schmidt-Lebuhn 2015 in an earlier issue), and are eligible for the Australian Systematic Botany student paper prize (in 2015 awarded to Rutherford et al. 2015). Reflecting on student contributions, a common refrain at the 2015 ASBS conference was that the future of systematic botany is bright, and more generally, the student presentations at ASBS conferences are often the highlight.
Beyond training the next generation, ‘Building Our Botanical Capital’ suggests investing in assets and infrastructure. Clearly herbaria and their collections are a key part of our botanical capital, and this was amply demonstrated by speakers at the 2015 ASBS conference. Increasingly, collections provide the foundation for botanical infrastructure. Australia’s Virtual Herbarium (http://avh.chah.org.au/) and the Atlas of Living Australia (http://www.ala.org.au/) provide excellent examples of the utilities that can be built on the foundations of Australian biodiversity collections. But these utilities also highlight the importance of investing in the collections themselves to ensure high quality of the underlying data (i.e. identifications and locality data). Advances in information technology are proving transformative in how systematic botany is conducted. In particular, the intellectual capital embedded in accumulated botanical knowledge can be made broadly and rapidly accessible. A particular exciting development in this area is the shift to electronic floras. The online Flora of New Zealand (http://www.nzflora.info/) impressed conference participants, as did the progress of individual state eFloras in Australia, and the eFlora of Australia (Knapp 2016) is eagerly awaited. However, as Kevin Thiele discusses in this issue (Thiele 2016), careful consideration of the implementation will help ensure that eFloras become a valuable part of our botanical capital.
The collection of articles in this special issue provides a snapshot of an engaging and far-ranging conference that presented a highly productive systematic botany community in Australasia, looking forward to a bright future. These articles present research at the forefront of systematic botany, including in developing novel approaches for answering research questions (Cross et al. 2016), applications in phylogenetics (Cargill et al. 2016; Foster et al. 2016b), biogeography (Schmidt-Lebuhn and Smith 2016) and taxonomy (Telford et al. 2016). On behalf of the editors of Australian Systematic Botany, I am delighted to present this special issue and look forward to a continuing, close association between the journal and the Australasian Systematic Botany Society.
Endymion Cooper is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow at Queen Mary University of London and an associate editor of Australian Systematic Botany
References
Anderson BM, Barrett MD, Krauss SL, Thiele K (2016) Untangling a species complex of arid zone grasses (Triodia) reveals patterns congruent with co-occurring animals. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 101, 142–162.| Untangling a species complex of arid zone grasses (Triodia) reveals patterns congruent with co-occurring animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cargill DC, Neal WC, Sharma I, Gueidan C (2016) A preliminary molecular phylogeny of the genus Riccia L. (Ricciaceae) in Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 29, 197–217.
| A preliminary molecular phylogeny of the genus Riccia L. (Ricciaceae) in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crayn D (2016) The Australasian Systematic Botany Society 2015 conference – papers and perspectives. Australian Systematic Botany 29, iii–iv.
| The Australasian Systematic Botany Society 2015 conference – papers and perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cross H, Biffin E, van Dijk K, Lowe A, Waycott M (2016) Effective application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches in systematics and population genetics: case studies in Eucalyptus and Acacia. Australian Systematic Botany 29, 235–246.
| Effective application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches in systematics and population genetics: case studies in Eucalyptus and Acacia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foster CSP, Sauquet H, van der Merwe M, McPherson H, Rossetto M, Ho SYW (2016a) Evaluating the impact of genomic data and priors on Bayesian estimates of the angiosperm evolutionary timescale. Systematic Biology
| Evaluating the impact of genomic data and priors on Bayesian estimates of the angiosperm evolutionary timescale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Published online early 20 September 2016]
Foster CSP, Cantrill DJ, James EA, Syme AE, Jordan R, Douglas R, Ho SYW, Henwood MJ (2016b) Molecular phylogenetics provides new insights into the systematics of Pimelea and Thecanthes (Thymelaeaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 29, 185–196.
| Molecular phylogenetics provides new insights into the systematics of Pimelea and Thecanthes (Thymelaeaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knapp ZF (2016) Gaps and priorities for the Flora of Australia: where to next? Australian Systematic Botany 29, 167–171.
| Gaps and priorities for the Flora of Australia: where to next?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rutherford S, Wilson PG, Rossetto M, Bonser SP (2015) Phylogenomics of the green ash eucalypts (Myrtaceae): a tale of reticulate evolution and misidentification. Australian Systematic Botany 28, 326–354.
| Phylogenomics of the green ash eucalypts (Myrtaceae): a tale of reticulate evolution and misidentification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Smith KJ (2016) From the desert it came: evolution of the Australian paper daisy genus Leucochrysum (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae). Australian Systematic Botany 29, 176–184.
| From the desert it came: evolution of the Australian paper daisy genus Leucochrysum (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Telford IRH, Pruesapan K, van Welzen PC, Bruhl JJ (2016) Morphological and molecular data show Synostemon trachyspermus (Phyllanthaceae, Phyllantheae) to be a heterogeneous species assemblage. Australian Systematic Botany 29, 218–234.
| Morphological and molecular data show Synostemon trachyspermus (Phyllanthaceae, Phyllantheae) to be a heterogeneous species assemblage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thiele KR (2016) This changes everything: dynamic floras and the disruption of traditional taxonomic practice. Australian Systematic Botany 29, 172–175.
| This changes everything: dynamic floras and the disruption of traditional taxonomic practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weber XA, Schmidt-Lebuhn AN (2015) Generic boundaries of Leucochrysum and Waitzia (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae). Australian Systematic Botany 28, 203–218.
| Generic boundaries of Leucochrysum and Waitzia (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |