Comparative wood anatomy of Taxaceae
Balkrishna Ghimire A C , Chunghee Lee B and Kweon Heo A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Applied Plant Science and Oriental Bio-herb Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, South Korea.
B Korea National Arboretum, Korea Forest Service, Pocheon 487-829, South Korea.
C Present address: Plant Conservation Division, Korea National Arboretum, Korea Forest Service, Pocheon 487-829, South Korea.
D Corresponding author. Email: laurus@kangwon.ac.kr
Australian Systematic Botany 28(3) 160-172 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14050
Submitted: 31 December 2014 Accepted: 6 August 2015 Published: 13 November 2015
Abstract
Comparative wood anatomy of Taxaceae s.l. was examined to elucidate the differences in wood features among genera. In total, 25 samples, comprising three varieties and seven species from five genera (Pseudotaxus was not included), were examined. Sliding microtome, wood maceration and scanning electron microscopy methods were used for the study. The growth rings are well developed and early and late wood are distinguishable in a cross-section. In general, there is remarkable uniformity in the characteristics of the five genera of Taxaceae, although some differences in quantitative traits were found. Wood of Taxaceae s.l. differs from that of most conifers by having helical thickening in the tracheid inner walls, with the exception of Austrotaxus spicata R.H.Compton. All genera are characterised by the absence of resin canals, predominantly uniseriate pits on the radial wall of the axial tracheids, and the presence of pits on the tangential walls of the axial tracheids. The rays are composed solely of parenchyma cells and are uniseriate (occasionally biseriate in Torreya nucifera (L.) Siebold et Zucc.), with a height of 1–22 cells. The genus Taxus shares more characteristics with Torreya than with Amentotaxus, Austrotaxus and Cephalotaxus. Correspondingly, Amentotaxus and Cephalotaxus resemble each other, marked by the presence of either diffuse or sparse axial parenchyma with nodulated transverse walls. Austrotaxus spicata is the sole species that lacks helical thickenings in the tracheid walls and has sparse axial parenchyma with smooth transverse walls. These two features, namely, the absence of helical thickenings and axial parenchyma with smooth transverse walls, are plesiomorphic and might be considered a more primitive character in wood anatomy. Among the other four genera, Amentotaxus appears to have an annular type of wall thickening that could be considered plesiomorphic to the spiral thickenings found in Taxus, Torreya and Cephalotaxus.
Additional keywords: axial parenchyma, Cephalotaxus, resin canal, wall thickenings.
References
Basinger JF (1981) The vegetative body of Metasequoia milleri from the middle Eocene of southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 59, 2379–2410.| The vegetative body of Metasequoia milleri from the middle Eocene of southern British Columbia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buchholz JT (1934) The classification of Coniferales. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science. Illinois State Academy of Science 25, 112–113.
Casperson G (1962) Über die Bildung der Zellwand beim Reaktionsholz. Holztechnologie 3, 217–223.
Chamberlain CJ (1935) ‘Gymnosperms: Structure and Evolution.’ (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)
Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price AR, Hills HG, Qiu Y-L, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer JD, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michaels HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KG, Clark WD, Hedren M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim K-J, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Xiang Q-Y, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GH, Graham SW, Barrett SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA (1993) Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcl. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80, 528–580.
| Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcl.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chaw SM, Zharkikh A, Sung HM, Lau TC, Li WH (1997) Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 56–68.
| Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjvFKrtw%3D%3D&md5=12ded1f74d2ec47a030ddb3a6fb21d38CAS | 9000754PubMed |
Cheng Y, Nicolson RG, Tripp K, Chaw SM (2000) Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14, 353–365.
| Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhsFyltrk%3D&md5=c4f7e2bda816057395250b29e6b77969CAS | 10712841PubMed |
Christenhusz MJM, Revel JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW (2011) A new classification and linear sequence of extent gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19, 55–70.
Dogra PD (1980) Embryogeny of gymnosperms and taxonomy: an assessment. Glimpses in Plant Research 5, 114–128.
Doyle J (1963) Proembryogeny in Pinus in relation to that in other conifers: a survey. Proceeding of the Royal Iris Academy 62, 181–216.
Esteban LG, de Palacios P (2009) Comparative wood anatomy in Abietoideae (Pinaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 160, 184–196.
| Comparative wood anatomy in Abietoideae (Pinaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Esteban LG, De Palacios P, Casasus AG, Fernandez G (2004) Characterization of the xylem of 352 conifers. Investigación Agrarian: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13, 452–478.
Falcon-Lang HJ (2005) Intra-tree variability in wood anatomy and its implications from fossil wood systematic and palaeoclimatic studies. Palaeontology 48, 171–183.
| Intra-tree variability in wood anatomy and its implications from fossil wood systematic and palaeoclimatic studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Florin R (1948) On the morphology and relationships of the Taxaceae. Botanical Gazette 110, 31–39.
| On the morphology and relationships of the Taxaceae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Florin R (1951) Evolution in cordaites and conifers. Acta Horticulture Bergiani 15, 285–388.
Florin R (1954) The female reproductive organs of conifers and taxads. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 29, 367–389.
| The female reproductive organs of conifers and taxads.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ghimire B, Heo K (2014) Cladistic analysis of Taxaceae s.l. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300, 217–223.
| Cladistic analysis of Taxaceae s.l.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ghimire B, Lee C, Heo K (2014) Leaf anatomy and its implication for phylogenetic relationship in Taxaceae s.l. Journal of Plant Research 127, 373–388.
| Leaf anatomy and its implication for phylogenetic relationship in Taxaceae s.l.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24496502PubMed |
Gothan W (1905) Zur Anatomie lebender und fossiler Gymnospermen – Hoelzer. (Koenigliche Geologische Landesanstalt und Bergakademie: Berlin)
Greguss P (1955) ‘Identification of Living Gymnosperms on the Basis of Xylotomy.’ (Akademiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary)
Greguss P (1972) ‘Xylotomy of the Living Conifers.’ (Akademiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary)
Hao DC, Xiao PG, Huang B, Ge GB, Yang L (2008) Interspecific relationships and origin of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae revealed by partitioned Bayesian analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 276, 89–104.
| Interspecific relationships and origin of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae revealed by partitioned Bayesian analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlKrtL3F&md5=e179494d0ee6fda82946e311758e4727CAS |
Hart JA (1987) A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 68, 296–370.
Hegnauer R (1988) Biochemistry, distribution and taxonomic relevance of higher plant alkaloids. Journal of Natural Products 27, 2423–2427.
Hu YS, Wang FH (1989) Anatomy and affinities of Cephalotaxus (Cephalotaxaceae). Cathaya 1, 37–48.
IAWA Committee (2004) IAWA list of microscopic features for softwood identification. IAWA Journal 25, 1–70.
| IAWA list of microscopic features for softwood identification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Immo H (2004) Systematic compilation and documentation of microscopic features of softwoods from the class of Pinatae. A PhD Dissertation submitted to Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Technische Universität München, Germany.
Janchen E (1949) Das system der Koniferen. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Sitzungsberichte. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Abteilung 1. Biology 158, 155–262.
Keng H (1969) Aspect of morphology of Amentotaxus formosana with a note on the taxonomic position of the genus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50, 432–445.
Kershaw AP, Martin HA, McEwen Mason JRC (1994) The Neogene – a period of transition. In ‘History of the Australian Vegetation.’ (Ed. RS Hill) pp. 299–327. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Korea National Arboretum (2007) ‘A synonymic list of vascular plants in Korea.’ (Korean National Arboratum–The Plant Taxonomic Society of Korea: Pocheon, South Korea)
Kostyniuk M (1967) Coniferous stumps from the brown coal deposit of Túrow near Bogatynia, SW Poland. Prace Muzeum Ziemi 10, 3–96.
Kräusel R (1949) Die foss ilen Koniferen-Holzer (unter Ausschluss von Araucarioxylon Kraus). II. Kritische Untersuchungen zur Diagnostik lebender und fossiler Koniferen-Holzer. Palaeontographica 89B, 83–203.
Lang XD, Su JR, Lu SG, Zhang ZJ (2013) A taxonomic revision of the genus Cephalotaxus (Taxaceae). Phytotaxa 84, 1–24.
| A taxonomic revision of the genus Cephalotaxus (Taxaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee TB (2003) ‘Coloured flora of Korea. Vol. I.’ (Hyangmunsa: Seoul, South Korea)
Leslie AB, Beaulieu JM, Rai HS, Carne PR, Donoghue MJ, Mathews S (2012) Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 16217–16221.
| Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsFGktL7L&md5=5fcba65bf960de6149de5c26a67dbe53CAS | 22988083PubMed |
Panshin AJ, de Zeeuw C (1980) ‘Textbook of Wood Technology’, 4th edn. (McGraw-Hill: New York)
Patel RN (1963) Spiral thickening in normal and compression wood. Nature 198, 1225–1226.
| Spiral thickening in normal and compression wood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Phillips EWJ (1948) ‘Identification of Softwood by their Microscopic Structure.’ Forest products research bulletins. (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK)
Pilger R (1926) Phylogenie und Systematik der Coniferae. In ‘Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien XIII’. (Eds A Engler, K Prantl) pp. 121–407. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig, Germany)
Price RR (1990) The genera of Taxaceae in the southeastern United State. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 71, 69–91.
Price RA (2003) Generic and familial relationship of the Taxaceae from rbcL and matK sequence comparision. Acta Horticulturae 615, 235–237.
Quinn CJ, Price RA, Gadak PA (2002) Familial concepts and relationships in the conifers based on rbcl and matK sequence comparisons. Kew Bulletin 57, 513–531.
| Familial concepts and relationships in the conifers based on rbcl and matK sequence comparisons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raubeson LA, Jansen RK (1992) A rare chloroplast-DNA structural mutation is shared by all conifers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 20, 17–24.
| A rare chloroplast-DNA structural mutation is shared by all conifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK38XhtVarsr4%3D&md5=f81dcf8cffb8b60bcf3e991b3670730dCAS |
Sahni B (1920) Taxales. Annals of Botany 34, 117–133.
Schonfeld E (1952) Mitteilungen über Funde aus dem Bornaer Braunkohlenrevier. Geologie 1, 377–383.
Singh H (1961) The life history and systematic position of Cephalotaxus drupacea Sieb. et Zucc. Phytomorphology 11, 153–197.
Singh H (1978) ‘Embryology of Gymnosperms. Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy.’ (Gebruder Bornträger: Berlin)
Spjut RW (2007) Taxonomy and nomenclature of Taxus (Taxaceae). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 1, 203–289.
Stefanovic S, Jager M, Deutsch J, Broutin J, Masselot M (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. American Journal of Botany 85, 688–697.
| Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjs12ksb4%3D&md5=3dbb5cb5b0876a2a36046dfa94ba63cbCAS |
Sudo S (1968) Anatomical studies on the wood of species of Picea, with some considerations on their geographical distribution and taxonomy. Tokyo Bulletin of the Government Forest Experiment Station 215, 39–130.
Sun BY (2007) Cephalotaxaceae. In ‘The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea’. p. 136. (Academy Publishing Co.: Seoul, South Korea)
Timell TE (1978) Helical thickenings and helical cavities in normal and compression wood of Taxus baccata. Wood Science and Technology 12, 1–15.
| Helical thickenings and helical cavities in normal and compression wood of Taxus baccata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vassio E, Martinetto E, Dolezych M, Van der Burgh J (2008) Wood anatomy of the Glyptostrobus europaeus ‘whole-plant’ from a Pliocene fossil forest of Italy. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 151, 81–89.
| Wood anatomy of the Glyptostrobus europaeus ‘whole-plant’ from a Pliocene fossil forest of Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Visscher GE, Jagels R (2003) Separation of Metasequoia and Glyptostrobus Cupressaceae) based on wood anatomy. IAWA Journal 24, 439–450.
| Separation of Metasequoia and Glyptostrobus Cupressaceae) based on wood anatomy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wardrop A, Dadswell HE (1951) Helical thickenings and micellar orientation in the secondary wall of conifer tracheids. Nature 168, 610–612.
| Helical thickenings and micellar orientation in the secondary wall of conifer tracheids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaG38%2Fht1CjtA%3D%3D&md5=a8feab6422cb717239c59ed32f4e38daCAS | 14882296PubMed |
Yadav D, Kumar P, Tiwari SP, Chauhan DK (2013) Comparative palynological and wood anatomical studies of Indian Taxus wallichiana Zucc., Cephalotaxus mannii Hook. and Cephalotaxus graffithii Hook. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299, 1231–1242.
| Comparative palynological and wood anatomical studies of Indian Taxus wallichiana Zucc., Cephalotaxus mannii Hook. and Cephalotaxus graffithii Hook.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yoshizawa N, Itoh T, Shimaji K (1985) Helical thickenings in normal and compression wood of some softwood. IAWA Bulletin 6, 131–138.
| Helical thickenings in normal and compression wood of some softwood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
