Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Systematic Botany Australian Systematic Botany Society
Taxonomy, biogeography and evolution of plants
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Phylogeny of Carpha and related genera (Schoeneae, Cyperaceae) inferred from morphological and molecular data

Xiufu Zhang A C , Jeremy J. Bruhl A , Karen L. Wilson B and Adam Marchant B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Botany, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, The University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

B National Herbarium of NSW, Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: xiufu_zhang@hotmail.com

Australian Systematic Botany 20(2) 93-106 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB06023
Submitted: 11 July 2006  Accepted: 26 October 2006   Published: 26 April 2007

Abstract

The limits, definitions and relationships of Carpha have been controversial and unclear. This study using cladistic analyses of morphological and combined morphological and molecular data indicates that: (1) Carpha sensu latu is paraphyletic and its species form two clades, consistent with the definitions of Carpha sensu stricto and Asterochaete respectively (i.e. the data support the division of Carpha sensu latu into two genera: Carpha sensu stricto and Asterochaete); (2) the morphological data show a high degree of homoplasy within Schoeneae; (3) Schoeneae is not a monophyletic tribe; (4) Schoenus and Tricostularia are polyphyletic; (5) it is better to place Schoenoides back in Oreobolus; (6) separation of Capeobolus brevicaulis from Costularia or Tetraria is supported; and (7) both genera Costularia and Tetraria should be maintained. The study resolves some phylogenetic relationships between Carpha and its relatives. Many aspects of these relationships are in agreement with previous studies, but some of these relationships have no support. The study also resolves the phylogenetic relationships of species of Carpha, although with lack of support for some clades, highlighting the need for other sources of data.


Acknowledgements

This study was undertaken while the first author was the recipient of an Overseas Postgraduate Research Scholarship and a University of New England (UNE) Research Scholarship. The authors thank Associate Professor N. Prakash (UNE) and three anonymous referees for their valuable comments, Dr Jin Li (UNE and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems) for help in dealing with statistical issues, and the directors and staff of B, BM, BOL, CANB, EA, HO, K, MEL, MO, NSW, NU, NY, P, PRE and Z for access to collections and/or loans. The first author also acknowledges financial support from N.C.W. Beadle Fund (Botany, UNE), Dame Bridget Ogilvie Research and Travelling Scholarships for Postgraduate Women, Joyce W. Vickery Scientific Research Fund (Linnean Society of New South Wales), and Student Travel Scholarship of UNE Academic Womens’s Association.


References


Archer C, Browning J, Gordon-Gray KD (1997) Studies in Cyperaceae in southern Africa 31: a third species of Cyathocoma, C. bachmannii. South African Journal of Botany 63, 167–171. and Zhang et al. (2006)
A1



The herbarium abbreviation, sheet number, the first collector and collection number are given. Type specimens are in bold. Genera and species are in alphabetical order, except the outgroups (Rhynchospora and Scleria) which are listed at the end of the taxon list
A2A


Appendix 2 Cont. 
A2B


Appendix 2 Cont. 
A2C




A3A


Appendix 3 Cont. 
A3B


Appendix 3 Cont. 
A3C