Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Science Access Science Access Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Rapid quenching of chlorophyll excited states in cyanobacteria, even in the absence of reaction centers

Dmitrii Vavilin and Wim Vermaas

PS2001 3(1) -
Published: 2001

Abstract

Reaction center complexes from oxygenic photosynthetic organisms contain chlorophyll a but lack chlorophyll b. However, peripheral antennas from plants, algae, and prochlorophytes contain both chlorophylls. This differential distribution generally is attributed to chlorophyll a binding specificity of reaction center proteins. However, we found that the pigment content of chlorophyll-binding proteins is determined in part by the local availability of specific chlorophylls at the time a chlorophyll-binding protein is synthesized. When the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (which naturally contains chlorophyll a but lacks chlorophyll b) is provided with the gene for both chlorophyll a oxygenase (required for chlorophyll b synthesis) and LHCII, the majority of the chlorophyll in PSII core complexes is chlorophyll b; in reaction center preparations about half of the chlorophyll is chlorophyll b. We interpret this to indicate that LHCII, which is unstable in Synechocystis, is required for chlorophyll a oxygenase activity, and that synthesized chlorophyll b is used by nascent PSII complexes. Resulting PSII core complexes with more than half of the chlorophyll a molecules replaced by chlorophyll b are functionally normal. Earlier experiments suggested a similar lack of specificity with respect to carotenoid binding in Synechocystis. Therefore, most pigment binding sites are not specific for one pigment and different pigments can be functionally accommodated at a particular site. The nature of the pigment to be incorporated at a specific site is determined in part by the relative availabilities of pigments. This allows the evolution of pigments and pigment-binding proteins to be rather independent processes.

https://doi.org/10.1071/SA0403248

© CSIRO 2001

Committee on Publication Ethics

PDF (172 KB) Export Citation

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email