Low-emission beef production in the Southern Rangelands of Western Australia: an analysis of herd structure and stocking rate experiencing droughts
C. d’Abbadie
A *
A
Abstract
Reconciling profitable cattle production with rangeland health and reduced emissions is a key challenge in the southern rangelands of Western Australia (WA). Stocking rate and herd structure selection are crucial decisions to achieve this balance. This study assessed the emission profiles of three contrasting herd structures (weaner production, live export, and slaughter production), and three stocking rates within a herd–carbon accounting modelling framework. The analysis considers the impact of varying drought frequencies on these cattle production systems. Herd models were developed for the semiarid southern WA rangelands. Stocking rates were set at 100%, 80% and 66% of the government recommended rate. Drought events (represented by Decile 2 rainfall years) were introduced at different frequencies within a 30-year simulation period. Slaughter production with a 66% stocking rate exhibited the lowest and most consistent carbon footprint, averaging around 15 kg CO2 equivalents/kg liveweight sold. Higher stocking rates and weaner production systems generally resulted in increased carbon footprint variability. Selecting a herd structure producing heavy steers and heifers for slaughter, combined with a conservative stocking rate (66% of recommended), offers a combined economic and environmental benefit for cattle production in the southern rangelands of WA. This strategy promotes financial sustainability while minimising emissions and enhancing resilience to drought events.
Keywords: beef production, bioeconomic modelling, carbon footprint, drought, emissions, herd structure, Rangeland economics, Southern Rangelands, stocking rate.
References
An-Vo D, Cobon D, Owens J, Liedloff A, Cowan T, Power S (2024) Impacts of environmental feedbacks on the production of a Central Queensland beef enterprise in a future climate. Agricultural Systems 214, 103838.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bastin G, Cowley R, Friedel M, Materne C (2024) Applying two remotely-sensed methods for monitoring grazing impacts in the Australian arid zone. The Rangeland Journal 45(4), 141-159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bowen MK, Chudleigh F (2021) An economic framework to evaluate alternative management strategies for beef enterprises in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 61, 271-281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bowen MK, Chudleigh F, Whish G, Phelps D (2019) Central West Mitchell Grasslands livestock production systems. Preparing for, responding to, and recovering from drought. (State of Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland: Brisbane) Available at https://futurebeef.com.au/projects/improving-profitability-and-resilience-of-beef-and-sheep-businesses-in-queensland-preparing-for-responding-to-and-recovering-from-drought/ [Accessed 19 October 2021]
d’Abbadie C, Kingwell R, Vercoe P, Plunkett B, Peggs A (2024) Heavy steers and heifers run at low stocking rates enhance drought resilience in a pastoral region of Australia. Agricultural Systems 218, 103993.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) (2022) Rangelands of Western Australia. (Perth, Western Australia). Available at https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/rangelands/rangelands-western-australia [accessed July 2024]
GGP (2015) GHG Protocol Agricultural Guidance. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. p. 103. Available at https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/GHG%20Protocol%20Agricultural%20Guidance%20%28April%2026%29_0.pdf [accessed March 2024]
Hacker RB, McDonald SE (2021) Prospects for sustainable use of the pastoral areas of Australia’s southern rangelands: a synthesis. The Rangeland Journal 43, 185-209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Holmes WE, Chudleigh F, Simpson G (2017) ‘Breedcow and Dynama herd budgeting software package. A manual of budgeting procedures for extensive beef herds. Version 6.02.’ (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries: Brisbane, Queensland) Available at https://breedcowdynama.com.au [accessed 19 October 2021]
Lopez MB, Dunn J, Wiedemann S, Eckard R (2024) A Greenhouse Accounting Framework for Beef and Sheep properties based on the Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory methodology. Available at http://piccc.org.au/Tools [updated February 2024]
Purvis JR (1986) Nurture the land: My philosophies of pastoral management in central Australia. The Australian Rangeland Journal 8, 110-117.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Purvis JR (1988) The story of Umberumbra. Range Management Newsletter, 88, 13-20. Available at https://www.austrangesoc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/88-3_Aug_1988_RMN.pdf [accessed March 2024]
Shackleton T (2021) ‘The pastoral industry snapshot. Pastoral Lands Board.’ (Government of Western Australia) Available at https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2024-06/plb-pastoral-industry-snapshot-december-2021.pdf [accessed July 2024]
Walsh D, Cowley R (2016) Optimizing beef business performance in northern Australia: what can 30 years of commercial innovation teach us? The Rangeland Journal 38, 291-305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wiedemann S, Longworth E, Campbell D, Duff K (2022) Carbon footprint and reduction options for Harvest Road Group operations. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/news-and-events/documents/p.psh.1259-final-report-public-240322-3.pdf
Wiedemann S, Longworth E, O’Shannessy R (2024) Net greenhouse-gas emissions and reduction opportunities in the Western Australian beef industry. Animal Production Science 64, AN23111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
