Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Do concerns about kangaroo management represent an existential threat for the red meat industry in the southern Australian rangelands?

K. Sinclair A B D , A. L. Curtis B and T. Atkinson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 1243 Bruxner Highway, Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia.

B Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries), Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

C NSW Department of Primary Industries, 34 Hampden Street, Dubbo, NSW 2830, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: katrina.sinclair@dpi.nsw.gov.au

The Rangeland Journal 41(6) 557-565 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ19063
Submitted: 17 August 2019  Accepted: 16 December 2019   Published: 11 Febuary 2020

Abstract

Concerns raised, including those voiced by animal rights and vegan activists, have limited the available practices by landholders in the southern Australian rangelands to effectively control kangaroos and, over time, the actions of these groups may threaten the existence of the livestock industry. This paper draws on interviews with key stakeholders and workshops with technical experts and red meat industry participants to identify strategies to respond to this potentially existential threat. Strategies include establishing platforms and processes for effective stakeholder engagement, establishing a unified and resourced industry ‘voice’ to effectively engage with government and other stakeholders, and ensuring that the industry self-regulates in order to avoid the potential for rogue elements to undermine its credibility and trustworthiness.

Additional keywords: external risk, landholder viability, macropod control, stakeholder engagement.


References

ABC (Australian Broadcasting Commission) (2015). California to ban kangaroo products despite Government lobbying. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2015/s4380295.htm (accessed 21 October 2019).

ABC (Australian Broadcasting Commission) (2019). Tougher laws for animal rights activists. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-08/tougher-laws-for-animal-rights-activists-amid-plans-for-protest/10979204 (accessed 16 October 2019).

AJP (Australian Justice Party) (2019). Policy on kangaroos. Available at: http://animaljusticeparty.org/policieslist/animals/kangaroos/ (accessed 1 August 2019).

Animals Australia (2019). Annual Report 2018–2019. Available at: https://animalsaustralia.org/about/annual_report.php (accessed 30 October 2019).

Aslin, H., and Bennett, D. (2000). Wildlife and world views: Australian attitudes toward wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5, 15–35.
Wildlife and world views: Australian attitudes toward wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Aslin, H., and Brown, V. (2004). Towards whole of community engagement: a practical toolkit. MDBC Publication 14/04. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.

Australian Government (2018). Department of Agriculture and Water Resources. Kangaroo meat. Available at: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/about/factsheets/kangaroo.pdf (accessed 15 July 2019).

Australian Government (2019). Department of Environment and Energy. Population, quota and harvest statistics for NSW, QLD, SA and WA commercial harvest areas. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/ee20f301-6c6c-44e4-aa24-62a32d412de5/files/kangaroo-statistics-states-2018.pdf (accessed 11 July 2019).

AVA (Australian Veterinary Association) (2019). Welfare Check. Available at: https://www.ava.com.au/about-us/ava-groups/cattle/resources/schemes/welfarecheck/ (accessed 31 October 2019).

Baldwin, C., Connor, S., and Perez, E. (2019). Investigating social acceptance for the wild catch commercial fishing industry in Southeast Queensland. FRDC project 2017/12. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. Canberra.

BAWP (Barristers Animal Welfare Panel) (2019). What do we do? Available at: http://bawp.org.au/what-we-do/ (accessed 25 October 2019).

Beetles, B. (2018). Coulton furious at Greens plot. Queensland Country Life 22, 5.

Chen, P. (2016). ‘Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy.’ (Sydney University Press: Sydney.)

Cherry, E. (2006). Veganism as a cultural movement: a relational approach. Social Movement Studies 5, 155–170.
Veganism as a cultural movement: a relational approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark, P., Clark, E., and Allen, B. (2018). Sheep, dingoes and kangaroos: new challenges and a change of direction 20 years on. In: ‘Advances in Conservation through Sustainable Use of Wildlife. Ch 4: Use and Control of Vertebrate Pests’. (Eds G Baxter, P Finch, P Murray.) pp. 173–178. (University of Queensland: Brisbane, Qld.)

Colton, J., Corscadden, K., Fast, S., Gattinger, M., Gehman, J., Hall Findlay, M., Morgan, D., Sayers, J., Winter, J., and Yatchew, A. (2016). Energy projects, social licence, public acceptance and regulatory systems in Canada: A white paper. Available at: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/energy-white-paper.pdf (accessed 17 October 2019).

Cooney, R., Baumber, A., Ampt, P., and Wilson, G. (2009). Sharing Skippy: how can landholders be involved in kangaroo production in Australia? The Rangeland Journal 31, 283–292.
Sharing Skippy: how can landholders be involved in kangaroo production in Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Glasgow, D. (2008). The law of the jungle: advocating for animals in Australia. Deakin Law Review 13, 181–210.
The law of the jungle: advocating for animals in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Greenebaum, J. (2012). Veganism, identity and the quest for authenticity. Food, Culture, & Society 15, 129–144.
Veganism, identity and the quest for authenticity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Humane Research Council (2014). Animal Tracker Australia. Baseline survey results – June 2014. Voiceless (funder), Humane Research Council (manager), Sydney.

Kennedy, H. (2018). Kangaroo industry collaboration. Available at: https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/story/5287932/kangaroo-industry-at-a-crossroad/ (accessed 15 July 2019).

Mazur, N. (2006). Social research to support the Animal Welfare Strategy: A synthesis report. ENVision Environmental Consulting, Canberra, ACT.

Mazur, N., and Brooks, K. (2018). The right conversations: building industry engagement capacity for socially-supported fisheries and aquaculture. FRDC project 2017/133. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.

Mazur, N., Curtis, A., and Bodsworth, A. (2014). Engagement strategy foundations for Australia’s wild-harvest professional fishing industry. FRDC project 2012/301. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W., and Moffat, K. (2017). Meaningful dialogue outcomes contribute to laying a foundation for social licence to operate. Resources Policy 53, 347–355.
Meaningful dialogue outcomes contribute to laying a foundation for social licence to operate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MLA (Meat & Livestock Australia) (2018). Social acceptability of pest animal management in meeting TGP targets. Available at: https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Social-acceptability-of-pest-animal-management-in-meeting-TGP-targets/3862 (accessed 22 July 2019).

Mummery, J., Rodan, D., and Nolton, M. (2016). Making change: digital activism and public pressure on livestock welfare. Ctrl-Z New Media Philosophy 6. Available at: http://www.ctrl-z.net.au/journal/?slug=mummery-rodan-nolton-making-change (accessed 10 January 2020).

Munro, L. (2005). Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights movement. Social Movement Studies 4, 75–94.
Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights movement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munro, L. (2012). The animal rights movement in theory and practice: a review of the sociological literature. Sociology Compass 6, 166–181.
The animal rights movement in theory and practice: a review of the sociological literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

NFF (National Farmers Federation) (2019a). Farmers tap city psyche to bridge urban-rural divide. Available at: https://www.farmonline.com.au/story/6437479/farmers-tap-city-psyche-to-bridge-urban-rural-divide/ (accessed 21 August 2019).

NFF (National Farmers Federation) (2019b). Government beefs up farm trespass laws. Available at https://farmers.org.au/news/government-beefs-up-farm-trespass-laws/ (accessed 1 August 2019).

NSW OEH (NSW Office of Environment and Heritage) (2017). NSW commercial kangaroo harvest management plans 2017–2022. Available at: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/research-and-publications/publications-search/nsw-commercial-kangaroo-harvest-management-plan-2017-2021 (accessed 9 July 2019).

Ogier, K., and Brooks, K. (2016). ‘License to Engage: Gaining and Retaining Your Social License in the Seafood Industry. A Handbook of Available Knowledge and Tools for Effective Seafood Industry Engagement with Communities.’ (Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies and KalAnalysis:, Hobart, Tas.)

Park, M., and Singer, P. (2012). The globlization of animal welfare: more food does not require more suffering. Foreign Affairs 91, 122–133.

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) (2019). What do you mean by animal rights. Available at: https://www.peta.org/about-peta/faq/what-do-you-mean-by-animal-rights/ (accessed 15 October 2019).

Pople, T., and Grigg, G. (1999). Commercial harvesting of kangaroos in Australia. Department of Environment and Energy, Australian Government, Canberra, ACT. Available at: https://www.environment.gov.au/node/16672 (accessed 19 July 2019).

Rodan, D., Mummery, J., and Bossio, D. (Ed.) (2014). Platforms and Activism: Sharing ‘My Make it Possible’ Narratives. In: ‘Proceedings of Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference’. (Swinburne University: Melbourne.)

RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) (2019). RSPCA approved products. Available at: https://rspcaapproved.org.au/rspca-approved-products (accessed 31 October 2019).

Sinclair, K., Curtis, A. L., Atkinson, T., and Hacke, R. B. (2019a). Public attitudes to animal welfare and landholder resource limitations: implications for total grazing pressure management in the southern rangelands of Australia. The Rangeland Journal 41, .
Public attitudes to animal welfare and landholder resource limitations: implications for total grazing pressure management in the southern rangelands of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair, K., Curtis, A. L., Hacker, R. B., and Atkinson, T. (2019b). Stakeholder judgments of the social acceptability of control practices for kangaroos, unmanaged goats and feral pigs in the south-eastern rangelands of Australia. The Rangeland Journal, 41, 485–496.
Stakeholder judgments of the social acceptability of control practices for kangaroos, unmanaged goats and feral pigs in the south-eastern rangelands of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SSAA (Sporting Shooters Association of Australia) (2019). SSAA Farm Assist program. Available at https://farmerassist.com.au/ (accessed 21 October 2019).

Stewart, J. (2009). ‘Dilemmas of Engagement: The Role of Consultation in Governance.’ (ANU E Press, The Australian National University: Canberra, ACT.)

Thomas, E., Bury, S., Louis, W., Amiot, C., Molenberghs, P., Crane, M., and Decety, J. (2019). Vegetarian, vegan, activists, radical: using latent profile analysis to examine forms of support for animal welfare. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 22, 836–857.
Vegetarian, vegan, activists, radical: using latent profile analysis to examine forms of support for animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomsen, D., Muir, K., and Davies, J. (2006). Aboriginal perspectives on kangaroo management in South Australia. The Rangeland Journal 28, 127–137.
Aboriginal perspectives on kangaroo management in South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vegan Australia (2019). What is veganism. Available at: https://www.veganaustralia.org.au/faq#what_is_veganism (accessed 16 October 2019)

Viva! (2017). Save the kangaroo campaign. Available at: https://www.savethekangaroo.com/ (accessed 9 July 2019).

Waters, C., Reseigh-O’Brien, J., Pahl, L., Atkinson, T., Burnside, D., and Revell, D. (2018). ‘Addressing Feed Supply and Demand Through Total Grazing Pressure Management.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Sydney, NSW.)

Western Lands Advisory Council (2016). Western Region Kangaroo Management Workshop – Final Report. Local Land Services Western Region, Dubbo, NSW.

Wilson, G. (2018). Co-production of Livestock and Kangaroos. In: ‘Conservation through Sustainable Use of Wildlife Conference’. 30 August–1 September 2016. (Eds G. Baxter and T. Pople.) (University of Queensland: Brisbane. Qld.)

Wilson, G., and Edwards, M. (2018). Professional kangaroo population control leads to better animal welfare, conservation outcomes and avoids waste. Australian Zoologist 40, 181–202.

Wrenn, C. (2012). Abolitionist animal rights: critical comparisons and challenges within the animal rights movement. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 4, 438–458.

Wrenn, C. (2013). Resonance of moral shocks in abolitionist animal rights advocacy: overcoming contextual constraints. Society & Animals 21, 379–394.
Resonance of moral shocks in abolitionist animal rights advocacy: overcoming contextual constraints.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |