An uncertain future: climate resilience of first-generation ranchers
Kate Munden-Dixon A D , Kenneth Tate B , Bethany Cutts C and Leslie Roche BA Geography Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
B Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
C Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: kmundendixon@ucdavis.edu
The Rangeland Journal 41(3) 189-196 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ18023
Submitted: 01 March 2018 Accepted: 11 August 2018 Published: 10 September 2018
Abstract
Policymakers and scholars agree that the aging and declining number of ranchers is a serious problem for the future of ranching and range management. Studies show that recruiting and retaining new ranchers is difficult due to a complex mix of start-up costs, knowledge and skill requirements, and regulatory barriers. While research suggests that first-generation farmers are different demographically and require individualised information, there is limited research on first-generation ranchers (FGRs); at best they are generalised as beginning farmers in research and outreach programs. This is surprising given ranchers’ unique knowledge requirements relating to the production of food and fibre, and the management of vast areas of public and private land. Based on a rangeland decision-making survey of 507 California Cattlemen’s Association members, this paper examines similarities and divergences in socioeconomic factors, management practices, drought adaptation strategies, information needs, and values between FGRs and multigenerational ranchers (MGRs). Survey results indicate FGRs and MGRs are not statistically different demographically and have similar values; however, key differences include FGRs using fewer information sources about ranching, fewer general management practices, and fewer drought adaptation practices. FGRs are also more susceptible to drought, and are underserved by organisations. Their vulnerability is particularly concerning, as many have limited drought experience, are more likely to take risks, and are less likely to find value and/or participate in ranching organisations. The future of rangelands requires that organisations interested in conserving rangelands and supporting ranchers re-evaluate assumptions about why FGRs and MGRs have different information needs beyond simplistic demographic identity, and instead focus on their affinity as FGRs in order to understand the complexity of the processes underlying these differences. We end with suggestions for a research agenda to support the climate resiliency of FGRs and increase the efficacy of support organisations.
Additional keywords: climate change and adaptation, resilience of rangeland systems, socioecological systems, rangeland management.
References
Ahearn, M. C. (2011). Potential challenges for beginning farmers and ranchers. Choices 26, 6.Bestelmeyer, B. T., and Briske, D. D. (2012). Grand challenges for resilience-based management of rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 654–663.
| Grand challenges for resilience-based management of rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Briske, D. D., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Brown, J. R., Fuhlendorf, S. D., and Polley, H. W. (2013). The Savory method can not green deserts or reverse climate change: a response to the Allan Savory TED video. Rangelands 35, 72–74.
| The Savory method can not green deserts or reverse climate change: a response to the Allan Savory TED video.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brislen, L., Tanaka, K., and Jacobson, K. (2016). Preferred knowledge sources for beginning farmers: the case of Kentucky. Journal of Extension 54, .
Brunson, M. W. (2012). The elusive promise of social-ecological approaches to rangeland management. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 632–637.
| The elusive promise of social-ecological approaches to rangeland management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brunson, M. W., and Huntsinger, L. (2008). Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the new west? Rangeland Ecology and Management 61, 137–147.
| Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the new west?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CALFIRE-FRAP (2010). California’s forests and rangelands: 2010 assessment. Available at: http://frap.fire.ca.gov/data/assessment2010/pdfs/california_forest_assessment_nov22.pdf (accessed 8 May 2018).
Dillman, D. A. (2011). ‘Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method—2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-mode Guide.’ (John Wiley & Sons.)
Ferranto, S., Huntsinger, L., Getz, C., Lahiff, M., Stewart, W., Nakamura, G., and Kelly, M. (2013). Management without borders? A survey of landowner practices and attitudes toward cross-boundary cooperation. Society & Natural Resources 26, 1082–1100.
| Management without borders? A survey of landowner practices and attitudes toward cross-boundary cooperation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huntsinger, L., and Bartolome, J. W. (2014). Cows? In California? Rangelands and livestock in the golden state. Rangelands 36, 4–10.
| Cows? In California? Rangelands and livestock in the golden state.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Inwood, S., Clark, J. K., and Bean, M. (2013). The differing values of multigeneration and first‐generation farmers: their influence on the structure of agriculture at the rural–urban interface. Rural Sociology 78, 346–370.
| The differing values of multigeneration and first‐generation farmers: their influence on the structure of agriculture at the rural–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kachergis, E., Derner, J. D., Cutts, B. B., Roche, L. M., Eviner, V. T., Lubell, M. N., and Tate, K. W. (2014). Increasing flexibility in rangeland management during drought. Ecosphere 5, art77.
| Increasing flexibility in rangeland management during drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knapp, C. N., and Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2009). Knowledge in practice: documenting rancher local knowledge in northwest Colorado. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 500–509.
| Knowledge in practice: documenting rancher local knowledge in northwest Colorado.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lubell, M. N., Cutts, B. B., Roche, L. M., Hamilton, M., Derner, J. D., Kachergis, E., and Tate, K. W. (2013). Conservation program participation and adaptive rangeland decision-making. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66, 609–620.
| Conservation program participation and adaptive rangeland decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Macon, D. K., Barry, S., Becchetti, T., Davy, J. S., Doran, M. P., Finzel, J. A., and Ingram, R. S. (2016). Coping with drought on California rangelands. Rangelands 38, 222–228.
| Coping with drought on California rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mann, C., and Sherren, K. (2018). Holistic management and adaptive grazing: a trainers’ view. Sustainability 10, 1848.
| Holistic management and adaptive grazing: a trainers’ view.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marshall, N. A., and Smajgl, A. (2013). Understanding variability in adaptive capacity on rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66, 88–94.
| Understanding variability in adaptive capacity on rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McClaran, M. P., Butler, G. J., Wei, H., and Ruyle, G. D. (2015). Increased preparation for drought among livestock producers reliant on rain-fed forage. Natural Hazards 79, 151–170.
| Increased preparation for drought among livestock producers reliant on rain-fed forage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mishra, A., Wilson, C., and Williams, R. (2009). Factors affecting financial performance of new and beginning farmers. Agricultural Finance Review 69, 160–179.
| Factors affecting financial performance of new and beginning farmers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Niewolny, K., and Lillard, P. (2010). Expanding the boundaries of beginning farmer training and program development: a review of contemporary initiatives to cultivate a new generation of American farmers. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1, 65–88.
| Expanding the boundaries of beginning farmer training and program development: a review of contemporary initiatives to cultivate a new generation of American farmers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roche, L. (2016). Adaptive rangeland decision-making and coping with drought. Sustainability 8, 1334.
| Adaptive rangeland decision-making and coping with drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roche, L. M., Schohr, T. K., Derner, J. D., Lubell, M. N., Cutts, B. B., Kachergis, E., and Tate, K. W. (2015). Sustaining working rangelands: insights from rancher decision making. Rangeland Ecology and Management 68, 383–389.
| Sustaining working rangelands: insights from rancher decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sayre, N. F. (2005). Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography 29, 276–290.
| Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sayre, N. F. (2006). ‘Ranching, Endangered Species, and Urbanization in the Southwest: Species of Capital.’ (University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ.)
Schohr, T. K. (2014). ‘Sustaining Multifunctional Working Rangelands: Social, Economic, and Ecological Insights into Rancher Decision-making.’ (University of California, Davis, CA.)
StataCorp (2017). Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX, USA. StataCorp LLC.
Teague, R. (2014). Deficiencies in the Briske et al. rebuttal of the Savory Method. Rangelands 36, 37–38.
| Deficiencies in the Briske et al. rebuttal of the Savory Method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
USDA (National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2007). National Agricultural Statistics Service. Census of agriculture: state data: California. Available at: www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/California/st06_1_014_016.pdf (accessed 4 February 2018).
