Chemical immobilisation and rangeland species: assessment of a helicopter darting method for Australian cattle
Jordan O. Hampton A B G , Anja Skroblin C F , Tom R. De Ridder D and Andrew L. Perry EA Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
B Ecotone Wildlife Veterinary Services, PO Box 76, Inverloch, Vic. 3996, Australia.
C Australian Wildlife Conservancy, Mornington Wildlife Sanctuary, PMB 925, Derby, WA 6728, Australia.
D Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, PO Box 96, Airport Administration Centre, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.
E Livestock Extension, PO Box 76, Inverloch, Vic. 3996, Australia.
F Present address: School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: j.hampton@ecotonewildlife.com
The Rangeland Journal 38(6) 533-540 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ16079
Submitted: 9 August 2016 Accepted: 4 October 2016 Published: 30 November 2016
Abstract
Chemical immobilisation (darting) is increasingly being used for the capture of rangeland animals. The aim of the present study was to assess a newly developed helicopter-based chemical immobilisation method for free-ranging Australian rangeland cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Eighteen cattle were darted from a helicopter in north-western Australia in September 2015 using a combination of xylazine and ketamine, partially reversed with yohimbine. Following a recently published framework for assessing helicopter darting methods, we quantified several animal welfare measures designed to quantify the severity and duration of stress imposed by the procedures. The duration of the procedures was generally short (median total duration 41 min), but for 33% of animals total duration exceeded 60 min. Although the sample size was small, mortality rate on the day of capture was 17% (three animals) and 28% (five animals) required physical restraint to achieve recumbency. We describe this newly developed method and discuss its relatively poor animal welfare outcomes compared with other validated helicopter darting methods. Legislation restricts veterinary chemicals that may be used for food-producing species in many countries, including Australia. Chemical immobilisation regimens other than the one chosen in the present study may produce superior animal welfare outcomes but would not be compliant with legislation in Australia. As a result of these restrictions, we suggest that development of an improved helicopter darting method for Australian cattle may prove difficult. Rangeland managers should carefully consider animal welfare impacts before undertaking chemical immobilisation programs, especially for food-producing species.
Additional keywords: arid rangelands, domestic animal production, rangeland management.
References
Amos, M., Baxter, G., Finch, N., and Murray, P. (2014). At home in a new range: wild red deer in south-eastern Queensland. Wildlife Research 41, 258–265.| At home in a new range: wild red deer in south-eastern Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arnemo, J. M., and Fahlman, Å. (2007). Biomedical protocol for free-ranging gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Scandinavia. (Norwegian School of Veterinary Science: Tromsø.)
Arnemo, J., and Søli, N. (1993). Chemical capture of free-ranging cattle: immobilization with xylazine or medetomidine, and reversal with atipamezole. Veterinary Research Communications 17, 469–477.
| Chemical capture of free-ranging cattle: immobilization with xylazine or medetomidine, and reversal with atipamezole.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czgtlWntQ%3D%3D&md5=9903fc3965807e0eedc5b16af5a22109CAS |
Arnemo, J., and Søli, N. (1995). Immobilization of free-ranging cattle with medetomidine and its reversal by atipamezole. Veterinary Research Communications 19, 59–62.
| Immobilization of free-ranging cattle with medetomidine and its reversal by atipamezole.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ot1entw%3D%3D&md5=73396d48328284b2b19165827cf2cc37CAS |
Arnemo, J. M., Ahlqvist, P., Andersen, R., Berntsen, F., Ericsson, G., Odden, J., Brunberg, S., Segerström, P., and Swenson, J. E. (2006). Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology 12, 109–113.
| Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arnemo, J. M., Evans, A. L., Miller, A. L., and Os, Ø. (2011). Effective immobilizing doses of medetomidine-ketamine in free-ranging, wild Norwegian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 47, 755–758.
| Effective immobilizing doses of medetomidine-ketamine in free-ranging, wild Norwegian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baker, S. E., Sharp, T. M., and Macdonald, D. W. (2016). Assessing animal welfare impacts in the management of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European moles (Talpa europaea) and carrion crows (Corvus corone). PLoS One 11, e0146298.
| Assessing animal welfare impacts in the management of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European moles (Talpa europaea) and carrion crows (Corvus corone).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bank, M. S., Franklin, W. L., and Sarno, R. J. (2000). Assessing the effect of radiocollars on juvenile guanaco survival. Oecologia 124, 232–234.
| Assessing the effect of radiocollars on juvenile guanaco survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bergvall, U. A., Kjellander, P., Ahlqvist, P., Johansson, Ö., Sköld, K., and Arnemo, J. M. (2015). Chemical immobilization of free-ranging fallow deer (Dama dama): effect of needle length on induction time. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 51, 484–487.
| Chemical immobilization of free-ranging fallow deer (Dama dama): effect of needle length on induction time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boardman, W. S., Lethbridge, M. R., Hampton, J. O., Smith, I., Woolnough, A. P., McEwen, M.-M., Miller, G. W., and Caraguel, C. G. (2014). Evaluation of medetomidine–ketamine and medetomidine–ketamine–butorphanol for the field anesthesia of free-ranging dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Australia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 50, 873–882.
| Evaluation of medetomidine–ketamine and medetomidine–ketamine–butorphanol for the field anesthesia of free-ranging dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFCmu7vM&md5=a366e2ae891abcb7f4c81ac7f83ce583CAS |
Brivio, F., Grignolio, S., Sica, N., Cerise, S., and Bassano, B. (2015). Assessing the impact of capture on wild animals: the case study of chemical immobilisation on alpine ibex. PLoS One 10, e0130957.
| Assessing the impact of capture on wild animals: the case study of chemical immobilisation on alpine ibex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carrick, P., Thomson, D., and Calley, G. (1990). The use of radio transmitters for tracking and shooting feral buffalo. The Rangeland Journal 12, 84–90.
| The use of radio transmitters for tracking and shooting feral buffalo.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke, C. M. H., and Henderson, R. J. (1979). Evaluation of a helicopter/dart-gun technique for capturing chamois and attaching radio telemetry collars. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6, 493–498.
| Evaluation of a helicopter/dart-gun technique for capturing chamois and attaching radio telemetry collars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DelGiudice, G. D., Krausman, P. R., Bellantoni, E. S., Etchberger, R. C., and Seal, U. S. (1989). Reversal by tolazoline hydrochloride of xylazine hydrochloride–ketamine hydrochloride immobilizations in free-ranging desert mule deer. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 25, 347–352.
| Reversal by tolazoline hydrochloride of xylazine hydrochloride–ketamine hydrochloride immobilizations in free-ranging desert mule deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXlsVKltr4%3D&md5=22e11451d20db486b647d6154dddb5faCAS |
DelGiudice, G. D., Sampson, B. A., Kuehn, D. W., Powell, M. C., and Fieberg, J. (2005). Understanding margins of safe capture, chemical immobilization, and handling of free-ranging white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 677–687.
| Understanding margins of safe capture, chemical immobilization, and handling of free-ranging white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Evans, A. L., Fahlman, A., Ericsson, G., Haga, H. A., and Arnemo, J. M. (2012). Physiological evaluation of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) immobilized with etorphine–xylazine–acepromazine in Northern Sweden. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 54, 77.
| Physiological evaluation of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) immobilized with etorphine–xylazine–acepromazine in Northern Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXitFKit70%3D&md5=d9771507e46b29031975cce85e53850eCAS |
Fuller, T. K., and Keith, L. B. (1981). Immobilization of woodland caribou with etorphine. The Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 745–748.
| Immobilization of woodland caribou with etorphine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL38XktVSltLo%3D&md5=35a358b6428fe1d09ae70705c2227450CAS |
Hampson, B., Zabek, M., Pollitt, C., and Nock, B. (2011). Health and behaviour consequences of feral horse relocation. The Rangeland Journal 33, 173–180.
| Health and behaviour consequences of feral horse relocation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton, J. O., Skroblin, A., Perry, A. L., and De Ridder, T. R. (2016a). Remote chemical immobilisation method for free-ranging Australian cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal , .
| Remote chemical immobilisation method for free-ranging Australian cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton, J., Robertson, H., Adams, P., Hyndman, T., and Collins, T. (2016b). An animal welfare assessment framework for helicopter darting: a case study with a newly developed method for feral horses. Wildlife Research 43, 429–437.
| An animal welfare assessment framework for helicopter darting: a case study with a newly developed method for feral horses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hernández, L., Barral, H., Halffter, G., and Colón, S. S. (1999). A note on the behavior of feral cattle in the Chihuahuan Desert of Mexico. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 259–267.
| A note on the behavior of feral cattle in the Chihuahuan Desert of Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hikasa, Y., Takase, K., Emi, S., and Ogasawara, S. (1988). Antagonistic effects of alpha-adrenoceptor blocking agents on reticuloruminal hypomotility induced by xylazine in cattle. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 52, 411–415.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXhvVCjuw%3D%3D&md5=23510afb2938c1932ba1bd0eeee50e64CAS |
Jingfors, K., and Gunn, A. (1989). The use of snowmobiles in the drug immobilization of muskoxen. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67, 1120–1121.
| The use of snowmobiles in the drug immobilization of muskoxen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53, 457–481.
| Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kock, M. D., la Grange, M., and du Toit, R. (1990). Chemical immobilization of free-ranging black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) using combinations of etorphine (M99), fentanyl, and xylazine. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 21, 155–165.
Kreeger, T. J., and Arnemo, J. (2012) ‘Handbook of Wildlife Chemical Immobilization.’ 4th edn. (Self-published)
Lazo, A. (1994). Social segregation and the maintenance of social stability in a feral cattle population. Animal Behaviour 48, 1133–1141.
| Social segregation and the maintenance of social stability in a feral cattle population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lethbridge, M. R., Anderson, N., Harper, M. L., and Gee, P. (2010). Movements and landscape use of camels in central Australia revealed by GPS satellite. The Rangeland Journal 32, 33–41.
| Movements and landscape use of camels in central Australia revealed by GPS satellite.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lian, M., Beckmen, K. B., Bentzen, T. W., Demma, D. J., and Arnemo, J. M. (2016). Thiafentanil–azaperone–xylazine and carfentanil–xylazine immobilizations of free-ranging caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) in Alaska, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 52, 327–334.
| Thiafentanil–azaperone–xylazine and carfentanil–xylazine immobilizations of free-ranging caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) in Alaska, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Linklater, W. L., and Cameron, E. Z. (2002). Escape behaviour of feral horses during a helicopter count. Wildlife Research 29, 221–224.
| Escape behaviour of feral horses during a helicopter count.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lutze, J., Derrick, J., Korth, W., and MacLachlan, D. (2009). Monitoring of pesticides and veterinary drugs in Australian cattle: verification of the residue control system. Food Additives and Contaminants 2, 99–111.
| Monitoring of pesticides and veterinary drugs in Australian cattle: verification of the residue control system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXot1Gj&md5=a7fec578d114df7a69a06d59e3f2aa7cCAS |
Mayberry, C., Bencini, R., Mawson, P., and Maloney, S. (2014). Sedation of western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus ocydromus) with tiletamine–zolazepam. Animal Welfare 23, 141–144.
| Sedation of western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus ocydromus) with tiletamine–zolazepam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXns1Glt7k%3D&md5=b7cf622ffe0d3cf7ee8fc39e592587d0CAS |
McCosker, T. H., and Eggington, A. R. (1986). Cattle mustering efficiency using helicopters in a monsoonal savanna woodland. The Rangeland Journal 8, 91–96.
| Cattle mustering efficiency using helicopters in a monsoonal savanna woodland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McMahon, C., and Bradshaw, C. (2008). To catch a buffalo: field immobilisation of Asian swamp buffalo using etorphine and xylazine. Australian Veterinary Journal 86, 235–241.
| To catch a buffalo: field immobilisation of Asian swamp buffalo using etorphine and xylazine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXotV2hs7w%3D&md5=890af4b994fd772e513dbd3a8efeab0cCAS |
McMahon, C. R., Hindell, M. A., and Harcourt, R. G. (2012). Publish or perish: why it’s important to publicise how, and if, research activities affect animals. Wildlife Research 39, 375–377.
| Publish or perish: why it’s important to publicise how, and if, research activities affect animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Micol, T., and Jouventin, P. (1995). Restoration of Amsterdam Island, South Indian Ocean, following control of feral cattle. Biological Conservation 73, 199–206.
| Restoration of Amsterdam Island, South Indian Ocean, following control of feral cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, B. F., Muller, L. I., Doherty, T., Osborn, D. A., Miller, K. V., and Warren, R. J. (2004). Effectiveness of antagonists for tiletamine–zolazepam/xylazine immobilization in female white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40, 533–537.
| Effectiveness of antagonists for tiletamine–zolazepam/xylazine immobilization in female white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1ylsrg%3D&md5=6baf6c556667983dd31f10dc08a667ceCAS |
Negus, G. (2004). Bull buggies. In: ‘George Negus Tonight’. (Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Sydney, NSW.)
Otte, M., Woods, A., and Abuabara, Y. (1992). Liveweight estimation of cattle by scale and by tape, a method comparison study. Tropical Animal Health and Production 24, 109–114.
| Liveweight estimation of cattle by scale and by tape, a method comparison study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ovFKhtw%3D%3D&md5=380a98a99ad21635b017f3461ec143b0CAS |
Petherick, J. C. (2005). Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: the northern Australian beef cattle industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 211–234.
| Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: the northern Australian beef cattle industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ponjoan, A., Bota, G., De La Morena, E. L. G., Morales, M. B., Wolff, A., Marco, I., and Mañosa, S. (2008). Adverse effects of capture and handling little bustard. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 315–319.
| Adverse effects of capture and handling little bustard.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Re, M., Blanco-Murcia, F. J., and de Segura, I. A. G. (2011). Chemical restraint and anaesthetic effects of a tiletamine–zolazepam/ketamine/detomidine combination in cattle. Veterinary Journal 190, 66–70.
| Chemical restraint and anaesthetic effects of a tiletamine–zolazepam/ketamine/detomidine combination in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXht12itLbN&md5=60780168bea7638659c8c0b5316c1f72CAS |
Re, M., Blanco-Murcia, F. J., San Miguel, J. M., and de Segura, I. A. G. (2013). Reversible chemical restraint of free-range cattle with a concentrated combination of tiletamine–zolazepam, ketamine, and detomidine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 77, 288–292.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvFeit7fJ&md5=108f101ec0d91571b1a2763256e93cb8CAS |
Roeber, D. L., Mies, P., Smith, C., Belk, K., Field, T., Tatum, J., Scanga, J., and Smith, G. (2001). National market cow and bull beef quality audit – 1999: a survey of producer-related defects in market cows and bulls. Journal of Animal Science 79, 658–665.
| National market cow and bull beef quality audit – 1999: a survey of producer-related defects in market cows and bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsVygtLY%3D&md5=74fc27ce35a2a99c7e71d759739212beCAS |
Rostal, M. K., Evans, A. L., Solberg, E. J., and Arnemo, J. M. (2012). Hematology and serum chemistry reference ranges of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) in Norway. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 48, 548–559.
| Hematology and serum chemistry reference ranges of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) in Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xht1Gju7fL&md5=e92a8dcbfbf6a086e6add407f4ccebeeCAS |
Rudge, M., and Joblin, R. (1976). Comparison of some methods of capturing and marking feral goats (Capra hircus). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 3, 51–55.
| Comparison of some methods of capturing and marking feral goats (Capra hircus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ryeng, K. A., Larsen, S., and Arnemo, J. M. (2002). Medetomidine–ketamine in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus): effective immobilization by hand- and dart-administered injection. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 33, 397–400.
| Medetomidine–ketamine in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus): effective immobilization by hand- and dart-administered injection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharp, T., and Saunders, G. (2011) ‘A Model for Assessing the Relative Humaneness of Pest Animal Control Methods.’ (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Canberra, ACT.)
Skroblin, A., Legge, S., Webb, T., and Hunt, L. P. (2014). EcoFire: regional-scale prescribed burning increases the annual carrying capacity of livestock on pastoral properties by reducing pasture loss from wildfire. The Rangeland Journal 36, 133–142.
| EcoFire: regional-scale prescribed burning increases the annual carrying capacity of livestock on pastoral properties by reducing pasture loss from wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Standing Committee on Agriculture, Animal Health Committee (1995). ‘Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals: Feral Livestock Animals. Destruction or Capture, Handling and Marketing.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Thomson, P. C. (1992). Capture of dingoes from a helicopter with tranquilliser darts loaded with ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride. Wildlife Research 19, 601–603.
| Capture of dingoes from a helicopter with tranquilliser darts loaded with ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Valkenburg, P., Boertje, R. D., and Davis, J. L. (1983). Effects of darting and netting on caribou in Alaska. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 1233–1237.
| Effects of darting and netting on caribou in Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Valkenburg, P., Tobey, R. W., and Kirk, D. (1999). Velocity of tranquilizer darts and capture mortality of caribou calves. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 894–896.
Walzer, C., Kaczensky, P., Ganbataar, O., Lengger, J., Enkhsaikhan, N., and Lkhagvasuren, D. (2006). Capture and anaesthesia of wild Mongolian equids – the Przewalski’s horse (Equus ferrus przewalskii) and the khulan (E. hemionus). Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences 4, 19–28.
Woolnough, A., Lethbridge, M., Hampton, J., Boardman, W., Rose, K., Campbell, S., Sharp, T., and Wales, S. (2011). ‘Development of SOPs and a Training Package for the Field Immobilisation of Large Herbivores in Judas Control Programs.’ (Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia: Perth, WA.)
Woolnough, A. P., Hampton, J. O., Campbell, S., Lethbridge, M. R., Boardman, W. S., Sharp, T., and Rose, K. (2012). Field immobilization of feral ‘Judas’ donkeys (Equus asinus) by remote injection of medetomidine and ketamine and antagonism with atipamezole. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 48, 435–443.
| Field immobilization of feral ‘Judas’ donkeys (Equus asinus) by remote injection of medetomidine and ketamine and antagonism with atipamezole.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XntFOktLo%3D&md5=829b2eaabafa435a446dab205b4db437CAS |
Zabek, M. A., Wright, J., Berman, D. M., Hampton, J. O., and Collins, C. W. (2014). Assessing the efficacy of medetomidine and tiletamine–zolazepam for remote immobilisation of feral horses (Equus caballus). Wildlife Research 41, 615–622.
| Assessing the efficacy of medetomidine and tiletamine–zolazepam for remote immobilisation of feral horses (Equus caballus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXltFehsr0%3D&md5=8864b932c7650e64406296d7b322feb2CAS |