Natural resources governance for the drylands of the Murray–Darling Basin
Graham R. Marshall A C and D. Mark Stafford Smith BA Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre, PO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: gmarshal@une.edu.au
The Rangeland Journal 32(3) 267-282 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ10020
Submitted: 30 March 2010 Accepted: 2 August 2010 Published: 14 September 2010
Abstract
Critiques of governance arrangements for natural resource management in Australia have expanded rapidly in recent years. Meanwhile, arguments have strengthened internationally that drylands share characteristics that justify a specific ‘drylands syndrome’ understanding of their management. These issues converge in the drylands of the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB). We explore in this paper the insights that this convergence offers for designing governance arrangements for the natural resources of the MDB. We argue that the characteristics of the MDB drylands justify transformation of these arrangements to those of adaptive governance; and more specifically that this model of governance should be founded on the related concepts of polycentricity and subsidiarity. We explain how three aspects of polycentric governance contribute to the robustness of social-ecological systems and identify the particular relevance of each to the MDB drylands. Even so, transformation to polycentric governance would face formidable obstacles from vested interests and mental models that have adapted to the status quo. Acknowledging the reality that hurdling such obstacles requires strategic preparation to exploit windows of opportunity, we propose several pragmatic steps to be followed in strategically pre-adapting the MDB drylands for this transformation. Although transforming to adaptive governance is not without risk, we argue that the risks of inaction for the MDB drylands are greater.
Additional keywords: adaptive governance, cost-effectiveness, drylands syndrome, polycentricity, robustness, subsidiarity, transformation.
Acknowledgements
Graham Marshall’s work reported in this article was supported by funding from the Australian Government’s Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities program for the project ‘Improving economic accountability when using decentralised, collaborative approaches to environmental decisions’. Mark Stafford Smith’s work reported herein was supported by CSIRO and funding from the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) Programme through the Desert Knowledge CRC (www.desertknowledgecrc.com.au, accessed 19 August 2010). We thank Vanessa Chewings for drawing Fig. 1. We greatly appreciated review comments on earlier versions of this manuscript from Nick Abel, Jason Alexandra, Jocelyn Davies, Warren Musgrave, Sarah Ryan, Alistair Watson and two anonymous reviewers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Australian Government, nor the Desert Knowledge CRC and its participants. This is Publication No. 11 in the development of a Science of Desert Living.
Arthur W. B.
(1999) Complexity and the economy. Science 284(5411), 107–109.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
(accessed 2 August 2010).
Lockwood M., Davidson J.
(2010) Environmental governance and the hybrid regime of Australian natural resources management. Geoforum 41(3), 388–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 19 July 2010).
Marshall G. R.
(2009b) Polycentricity, reciprocity, and farmer adoption of conservation practices under community-based governance. Ecological Economics 68, 1507–1520.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 16 March 2010).
Moran M., Elvin R.
(2009) Coping with complexity: adaptive governance in desert Australia. GeoJournal 74, 415–428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 8 April 2010).
Ostrom E.
(1999) Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2, 493–535.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 3 August 2010).
Papas M.
(2007) The proposed governance framework for the Murray–Darling Basin. Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 4, 77–90.
(accessed 7 July 2010).
Reynolds J. F.,
Stafford Smith D. M.,
Lambin E. F.,
Turner B. L.,
Mortimore M.,
Batterbury S. P. J.,
Downing T. E.,
Dowlatabadi H.,
Fernandez R. J.,
Herrick J. E.,
Huber-Sannwald E.,
Jiang H.,
Leemans R.,
Lynam T.,
Maestre F. T.,
Ayarza M., Walker B.
(2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316, 847–851.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
(accessed 17 March 2010).
Wagner R. E.
(2005) Self-governance, polycentrism, and federalism: Recurring themes in Vincent Ostrom’s scholarly oeuvre. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57(2), 173–188.
| Crossref |
(accessed 2 March 2010).
Watson A.
(2010) If I were Minister for Agriculture? Farm Policy Journal 7(2), 27–31.
Young M. D., McColl J. C.
(2009) Double trouble: the importance of accounting for and defining water entitlements consistent with hydrological realities. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 53, 19–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |