Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Camel usage and impacts at a permanent spring in central Australia: a case study

Jayne Brim-Box A F , Tracey Guest B , Peter Barker C , Mirjana Jambrecina B , Sean Moran D and Rene Kulitja E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Wildlife Use, Department of Natural Resources, Environment, the Arts and Sport, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia.

B Uluru–Kata Tjuta National Park, Natural and Cultural Resources, Yulara, NT 0872, Australia.

C Greening Australia NT, Alice Springs, NT, Australia.

D Central Land Council, Mutitjulu, NT, Australia.

E Maruku Arts, CMA Ininti Store, Ayers Rock, NT, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: brimbox@gmail.com

The Rangeland Journal 32(1) 55-62 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09042
Submitted: 3 July 2009  Accepted: 16 December 2009   Published: 23 March 2010

Abstract

The impact of camel usage at a small rockhole (‘X’) on the Petermann Aboriginal Land Trust was evaluated from May 2007 through to July 2008. Camel usage and impacts were determined through multiple methods including ground cover, vegetation and macroinvertebrate surveys and through the use of surveillance cameras and depth loggers. Camels appear to use X most heavily in periods when rainfall is scant and more at night than during the day. However, in long periods with little or no rainfall, it appears that camels use X heavily during the day and night and there is little chance for X to re-fill. The low number of macroinvertebrates present during the study period suggests that the aquatic fauna is negatively impacted by the presence of camels, as was the vegetation surrounding X. Shrubs near X showed signs of heavy browsing and the ground cover became denuded of vegetation due to camel browsing and trampling during dry periods. This could lead to long-term alterations in drainage patterns and erosion of the site. Follow-up vegetation and ground cover surveys are needed to better assess these impacts. X was and is a traditional source of drinking water for people travelling through the country. Preliminary microbial analysis indicated that at certain periods X is not suitable for drinking, even if the water itself looks ‘clean’ or clear. The faecal contamination evident was most probably due to camel use of the waterhole. These results have been discussed with traditional owners, but further microbial analyses may be needed for longer-term assessments.


Acknowledgments

We thank and greatly appreciate the guidance, discussions with and participation of the following traditional owners and Mutitjulu community members during our visits; Cassidy Uluru, Reggie Uluru, Steven Uluru, Johnny Jingo, Wangan No.1., Ashely Paddy, Lochlan Jingo, David Moneymoon, Robert Sevens, Richard Kulitja, Joyce Tjiliri, Wionna Palma, Selwyn Kurukringa, Pamala Ray and Bessie Nipper. We thank Daisy Walkabout, Phillip Driften, Mick Starkey, Sam Steel, Niall Stephen, Amber Forbes and Steve Anderson of UKTNP for their field and office help, insights and support for this assessment. We especially thank Rene and Richard Kulitja for their help and insights regarding rockhole X. We thank Andrew Drenen and David Alexander of the Central Land Council for their support and guidance. Glenn Edwards and two anonymous reviewers made helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. The work reported in this publication was supported by funding from the Australian Government Natural Heritage Trust through the Desert Knowledge CRC, UKTNP, Central Land Council, Greening Australia and Biodiversity Conservation South (NRETAS); the views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government or the Desert Knowledge CRC or its participants.


References


Box J. B., Duguid A., Read R., Kimber R. G., Knapton A., Davis J., Bowland A. E. (2008) Central Australian waterbodies: the importance of permanence in a desert landscape. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 1395–1413.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 20 June 2008)

Davis J. A. (1997) Conservation of aquatic invertebrate communities in central Australia. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56, 491–503. (accessed 1 December 2009)

Dufour A. , Snozzi M. , Koster W. , Bartram J. , Ronchi E. and Fewtrell L. (Eds) (2003). ‘Assessing Microbial Safety of Drinking Water: Improving Approaches and Methods.’ (IWA Publishing: London.)

Edwards G. P. , Zeng B. and Saalfeld W. K. (2008). Evaluation of the impacts of feral camels. In: ‘Managing the impacts of feral camels in Australia: a new way of doing business’. DKCRC Report 47. (Eds G. P. Edwards, B. Zeng and K. W. Saalfeld.) pp. 133–182. (Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre: Alice Springs.) Available at: www.desertknowledgecrc.com.au/publications/contractresearch.html (accessed 4 December 2009)

Herrick J. E. , Van Zee J. W. , Havstad K. M. , Burkett L. M. and Whitford W. G. (2005). ‘Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland and Savannah Ecosystems: Vol. I – Quick Start.’ (USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range: Las Cruces, New Mexico.)

Solinst Canada Ltd (2008). ‘User Guide for Solinst Levelogger Model 3001. Software Version 3.2.3.’ (Georgetown: Ontario.)