Harnessing benefits from improved livestock water productivity in crop–livestock systems of sub-Saharan Africa: synthesis
Tilahun Amede A B D , Katrien Descheemaeker A B , Don Peden B and Andre van Rooyen CA International Water Management Institute (IWMI), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
B International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
C International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics (ICRISAT), PO Box 776, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
D Corresponding author. Email: t.amede@cgiar.org
The Rangeland Journal 31(2) 169-178 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09023
Submitted: 24 April 2009 Accepted: 11 May 2009 Published: 19 June 2009
Abstract
The threat of water scarcity in sub-Saharan Africa is real, due to the expanding agricultural needs, climate variability and inappropriate land use. Livestock keeping is the fastest growing agricultural sector, partly because of increasing and changing demands for adequate, quality and diverse food for people, driven by growing incomes and demographic transitions. Besides the economic benefits, rising livestock production could also deplete water and aggravate water scarcity at local and global scales. The insufficient understanding of livestock–water interactions also led to low livestock productivity, impeded sound decision on resources management and undermined achieving positive returns on investments in agricultural water across sub-Saharan Africa. Innovative and integrated measures are required to improve water productivity and reverse the growing trends of water scarcity. Livestock water productivity (LWP), which is defined as the ratio of livestock outputs to the amount of water depleted, could be improved through: (i) raising the efficiency of the water inputs by integrating livestock with crop, water and landscape management policies and practices. Improving feed water productivity by maximising transpiration and minimising evaporation and other losses is critical; (ii) increasing livestock outputs through improved feed management, veterinary services and introducing system-compatible breeds; and (iii) because livestock innovation is a social process, it is not possible to gain LWP improvements unless close attention is paid to policies, institutions and their associated processes. Policies targeting infrastructure development would help livestock keepers secure access to markets, veterinary services and knowledge. This paper extracts highlights from various papers presented in the special issue of The Rangeland Journal on technologies and practices that would enable improving water productivity at various scales and the premises required to reverse the negative trends of water depletion and land degradation.
Additional keywords: institutions, interventions, policies.
Amede T.,
Geheb K., Douthwaite B.
(2009) Enabling the uptake of livestock–water productivity interventions in the crop–livestock systems of sub-Saharan Africa. The Rangeland Journal 31, 223–230.
Amede T.,
Kirkby R., Stroud A.
(2006) Intensification pathways from farmer strategies to sustainable livelihoods: AHIs’ experience. Currents 40/41, 30–37.
Asefa D. T.,
Oba G.,
Weladji R. B., Colman J. E.
(2003) An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing lands in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development 14, 25–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Asner G. P.,
Elmore A. J.,
Olander L. P.,
Martin R. E., Harris A. T.
(2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses and global change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29, 261–299.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blümmel M., Rao O. P. P.
(2006) Economic value of sorghum stover traded as fodder for urban and peri-urban dairy production in Hyderabad, India. International Sorghum and Millets Newsletter 47, 97–101.
Blümmel M.,
Samad M.,
Singh O. P., Amede T.
(2009) Opportunities and limitations of food–feed crops for livestock feeding and implications for livestock–water productivity. The Rangeland Journal 31, 207–212.
Bossio D.
(2009) Livestock and water: understanding the context based on the ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture’. The Rangeland Journal 31, 179–186.
Bouman B.
(2007) A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales. Agricultural Systems 93, 43–60.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bruijnzeel L. A.
(2004) Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 104, 185–228.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cook S. E.,
Andersson M. S., Fisher M. J.
(2009) Assessing the importance of livestock water use in basins. The Rangeland Journal 31, 195–205.
Delgado C. L.
(2003) Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution. Journal of Nutrition 133, 3907S–3910S.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Derib S. D.,
Assefa T.,
Berhanu B., Zeleke G.
(2009) Impacts of micro-basin water harvesting structures in improving vegetative cover in degraded hillslope areas of north-east Ethiopia. The Rangeland Journal 31, 259–265.
Descheemaeker K.,
Raes D.,
Nyssen J.,
Poesen J.,
Haile M., Deckers J.
(2009) Changes in water flows and water productivity upon vegetation regeneration on degraded hillslopes in northern Ethiopia: a water balance modelling exercise. The Rangeland Journal 31, 237–249.
Devendra C., Thomas D.
(2002) Crop-animal interactions in mixed farming systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems 71, 27–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Falkenmark M.
(2007) Shift in thinking to address the 21st century hunger gap. Moving focus from blue to green water management. Water Resources Management 21, 3–18.
| Crossref |
Gebreselassie S.,
Peden D.,
Haileslassie A., Mpairwe D.
(2009) Factors affecting livestock water productivity: animal scale analysis using previous cattle feeding trials in Ethiopia. The Rangeland Journal 31, 251–258.
Hadjigeorgiou I.,
Osoro K.,
Fragoso de Almeida J. P., Molle G.
(2005) Southern European grazing lands: production, environmental and landscape management aspects. Livestock Production Science 96, 51–59.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haileslassie A.,
Peden D.,
Gebreselassie S.,
Amede T.,
Wagnew A., Taddesse G.
(2009) Livestock water productivity in the Blue Nile Basin: assessment of farm scale heterogeneity. The Rangeland Journal 31, 213–222.
Johansson R.,
Tsur Y.,
Roe T.,
Doukkali R., Dinar A.
(2002) Pricing irrigation water: a review of theory and practice. Water Policy 4, 173–199.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lenné J.,
Fernandez-Rivera S., Blümmel M.
(2003) Approaches to improve the utilization of food-feed crops – synthesis. Field Crops Research 84, 213–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pagiola S.,
Ramírez E.,
Gobbi J.,
de Haan C.,
Ibrahim M.,
Murgueitio E., Ruíz J. P.
(2007) Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics 64, 374–385.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Passioura J. B.
(2006) Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce – from breeding to field management. Agricultural Water Management 80, 176–196.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peden D.,
Taddesse G., Haileslassie A.
(2009) Livestock water productivity: implications for sub-Saharan Africa. The Rangeland Journal 31, 187–193.
Pimentel D.,
Berger B.,
Filiberto D.,
Newton M.,
Wolfe B.,
Karabinakis E.,
Clark S.,
Poon E.,
Abbett E., Nadagopol S.
(2004) Water resources: agricultural and environmental issues. Bioscience 54, 909–918.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Postel S.
(2000) Entering an era of water scarcity: the challenges ahead. Ecological Applications 10, 941–948.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Renault D., Wallendar W.
(2000) Nutritional water productivity and diets. Agricultural Water Management 45, 275–296.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richmond A.,
Kaufman R., Myneni R.
(2007) Valuing ecosystem services: a shadow price for net primary production. Ecological Economics 64, 454–462.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rockström J., Barron J.
(2007) Water productivity in rainfed systems: overview of challenges and analysis of opportunities in water scarcity prone savannahs. Irrigation Science 25, 299–311.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roothaert R., Franzel S.
(2001) Farmers’ preferences and use of local fodder trees and shrubs in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 52, 239–252.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schiere J.,
Singh K., De Boer J.
(2000) Farming systems research applied in a project on feeding of crop residues in India. Experimental Agriculture 36, 51–62.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh B.,
Ajeigbe H.,
Tarawali S.,
Fernandez-Rivera S., Abubakar M.
(2003) Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Research 84, 169–177.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh O.,
Sharma A.,
Singh R., Shah T.
(2004) Virtual water trade in dairy economy. Irrigation water productivity in Gujarat. Economic and Political Weekly 39, 3492–3497.
Speedy A. W.
(2003) Global production and consumption of animal source foods. The Journal of Nutrition 133, 4048S–4053S.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Wallace J.
(2000) Increasing agricultural water use efficiency to meet future food production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 82, 105–119.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waters-Bayer A., Bayer W.
(2009) Enhancing local innovation to improve water productivity in crop–livestock systems. The Rangeland Journal 31, 231–235.
Wilson T.
(2007) Perceptions, practices, principles and policies in provision of livestock water in Africa. Agricultural Water Management 90, 1–12.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |