Implementing risk management for water supplies: a catalyst and incentive for change
Robyn Grey-GardnerThe Rangeland Journal 30(1) 149-156 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ07046
Submitted: 10 June 2007 Accepted: 26 November 2007 Published: 1 April 2008
Abstract
Water management in small Aboriginal settlements in remote Australia is typified by technology-driven approaches where knowledge, decision-making and responsibility reside with organisations and agencies outside the settlement. This conventional approach has been a disincentive to active involvement by residents in managing the hazards and risks of their own water supply, despite the apparent presence of knowledge and skills at the settlement level.
This paper outlines lessons from the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre’s Remote Community Water Management Project. The aim of the 2-year project was to identify a replicable model and process for sustainable small scale water supply management in remote Aboriginal settlements. The approach was a practical departure from viewing water quality in isolation from the other water supply issues such as water quantity, affordability, additional resources and aspirations. The risk management model that was developed and utilised is presented and the significant factors that enabled a holistic approach to water supply management are discussed.
The dynamic combination of participatory processes and an iterative approach enabled effective project implementation, and created an environment of continual improvement. Critical elements of the project implementation are described, in particular, the sequencing of activities and the identification of incentives and drivers for increasing self reliance. The social capital within the case study settlements is explored as a critical attribute for a sustainable management program or change process.
The model developed during the project provides a structure for expanding the approach to, for example, a regional water management strategy. The opportunities for expansion are further enhanced by the practices of developing appropriate and transferable tools. The integration of livelihood aspirations within institutions of policy and water risk management practice is endorsed for effective and sustainable local water management.
Additional keywords: local water management, participatory planning, remote, social capital.
Acknowledgements
The work reported in this publication was supported by funding from the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centres Programme through the Desert Knowledge CRC; the views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Desert Knowledge CRC or its Participants. Core research partners in the Remote Community Water Management project were the Commonwealth Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and the Centre for Appropriate Technology in collaboration with the Cooperative Research Centre for Water Quality and Treatment.
Brown D.,
Taylor J., Bell M.
(2008) The demography of desert Australia. The Rangeland Journal 30, 29–43.
| Crossref |
(accessed 3 June 2007)
Hrudey S.
(2004) Drinking-water risk management principles for a total quality management framework. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 67, 1555–1566.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
(accessed 3 June 2007)
Kotter J. P.
(1995) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review 73, 59–67.
Rizak S.,
Cunliffe D.,
Sinclair M.,
Vulcano R.,
Howard J.,
Hrudey S., Callan P.
(2003) Drinking water quality management: a holistic approach. Water Science and Technology 47, 31–36.
| PubMed |
Taylor J.
(1989) Migration and population change in the Northern Territory. Australian Geographical Studies 27, 182–198.
| Crossref |
Woolcock M., Narayan D.
(2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank Research Observer 15, 225–250.