Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development
Jocelyn Davies A D , Janelle White B , Alyson Wright C , Yiheyis Maru A and Michael LaFlamme AA CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 2111, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia.
B Centre for Rural Health and Community Development, University of South Australia, Nicolson Avenue, Whyalla Norrie, SA 5608, Australia.
C Centre for Appropriate Technology, 32 Priest St, Alice Springs, NT 0870, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: jocelyn.davies@csiro.au
The Rangeland Journal 30(1) 55-65 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ07038
Submitted: 8 June 2007 Accepted: 27 November 2007 Published: 1 April 2008
Abstract
The sustainable livelihoods approach is widely used in rural development internationally but has been little applied in Australia. It is a framework for thinking and communicating about factors that impact on the livelihoods of individuals and families including their health, well being and income and the maintenance of natural resource condition. The approach aims to promote a systemic understanding of how multiple variables impact on local people’s livelihoods. Three case studies are outlined, that highlight its potential as a tool for collaborative engagement of researchers, local people and other stakeholders, to promote sustainability of Aboriginal livelihood systems in remote desert Australia and to contribute to improved understanding of the dynamics of regional socio-ecological systems.
Additional keywords: assets, disadvantage, indigenous, institutions, native food, vulnerability.
Acknowledgements
Case study contributions are from Alyson Wright (Engawala from the DKCRC Resource Flows project); Janelle White (Bush foods livelihoods from the DKCRC Bush foods project); Yiheyis Maru and Jocelyn Davies with Robyn Grey-Gardner and Hannah Hueneke (Anmatjere from the DKCRC Outback Livelihoods in Anmatjere region project). Ro Hill, Mark Stafford Smith and three anonymous referees provided useful comment that greatly improved drafts of this paper. The work reported in this publication was supported by funding from the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centres Programme through the Desert Knowledge CRC; the views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Desert Knowledge CRC or its participants.
Arce A.
(2003) Value contestations in development interventions: community development and sustainable livelihood approaches. Community Development Journal 38, 199–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 20 May 2007)
Batterbury S., Forsyth T.
(1999) Fighting back: human adaptations in marginal environments. Environment 41, 25–30.
(accessed 15 August 2006)
Cass A.,
Cunningham J.,
Snelling P.,
Wang Z., Hoy W.
(2004) Exploring the pathways leading from disadvantage to end-stage renal disease for Indigenous Australians. Social Science and Medicine 58, 767–785.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
(accessed 10 July 2007)
de Haan L. J.
(2000) The question of development and environment in geography in the era of globalisation. GeoJournal 50, 359–367.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 19 March 2008)
Lovell C.,
Mandondo A., Moriarty P.
(2002) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Conservation Ecology 5, 25.
(accessed 25 September 2007).
Murray C.
(2002) Livelihoods research: transcending boundaries of time and space. Journal of Southern African Studies 28, 489–509.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 5 April 2007)