86 EFFECT OF CRYOPROTECTANT EXPOSURE, VITRIFICATION, AND WARMING TIME OF BOVINE CUMULUS OOCYTE COMPLEXES ON IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

Despite the importance of cryoprotectants for avoiding ice crystal formation, the high concentrations required for vitrification may be toxic to bovine oocytes. During warming (thawing), the removal of permeating cryoprotectants from cells can lead to osmotic injury, and the most appropriate time interval for warming and cryoprotectant removal from vitrified oocytes is currently uncertain. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of cryoprotectant exposure, vitrification, and warming time of bovine cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) on fertilization and ability to develop as embryos in vitro. Follicles <8 mm in diameter were aspirated from slaughterhouse-derived bovine ovaries. Cumulus oocyte complexes with ≥3 layers of cumulus cells and a uniform cytoplasm were selected, washed 3 times in Dulbecco’s PBS + 5% newborn calf serum (CS), and randomly divided into 4 groups: 1) control group: no treatment; 2) VS1 group: COC were exposed to vitrification solution 1 [VS1: 7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) and 7.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in TCM-199 + 20% CS] for 5 min; 3) VS1+VS2 group: COC were exposed to VS1 for 5 min followed by vitrification solution 2 (VS2: 15% EG, 15% DMSO, and 0.5 M sucrose in TCM-199 + 20% CS) for 30 s; and 4) vitrified group: COC were exposed to VS1 and VS2, and then vitrified in liquid nitrogen using cryotops. The COC in VS1, VS1+VS2, and vitrified groups were exposed to a warming solution (0.5 M sucrose in TCM-199) for 1 or 5 min. The COC from all groups were in vitro matured (IVM) for 22 h in TCM-199 containing 5% CS, 5 μg mL^–1 LH, 0.5 μg mL^–1 FSH, and 0.05 μg mL^–1 gentamicin at 38.5°C, 5% CO₂, and high humidity, incubated with frozen–thawed sperm in Brackett-Oliphant capacitating medium for 18 h, and the presumptive zygotes were cultured in Charles Rosenkrans 1 amino acids (CR1aa) + 5% CS for 9 days. Data were analysed using Proc Glimmix in SAS^® 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Cleavage and blastocyst rates in the vitrified group (25 and 2%, respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than in control (75 and 27%), VS1 (68 and 19%), or VS1+VS2 (63 and 22%) groups. Cleavage and blastocyst rates did not differ among non-vitrified groups (P > 0.05). In VS1, VS1+VS2, and vitrified groups, warming time had no effect on cleavage or blastocyst rates (P > 0.05). In conclusion, although cryoprotectant exposure and warming times had no apparent adverse effect, vitrification of bovine COC drastically reduced cleavage and blastocyst rates. Further studies are required to understand how vitrification of bovine COC affects subsequent fertilization and embryo development.