111 SLOW FREEZING AND VITRIFICATION OF IN VITRO-MATURED DOMESTIC CAT OOCYTES
J. Braun A , C. Otzdorff A , T. Tsujioka B and S. Hochi BA Veterinary College, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Muenchen, Germany
B Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(1) 173-173 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv19n1Ab111
Submitted: 12 October 2006 Accepted: 12 October 2006 Published: 12 December 2006
Abstract
The effects of slow freezing or vitrification as well as exposure to the cryoprotective media without cooling and warming of in vitro-matured domestic cat oocytes on the in vitro development to the blastocyst stage was investigated. Cumulus–oocyte complexes were matured for 24 h in TCM-199 supplemented with 3 mg mL−1 BSA, 1 µg mL−1 estradiol, 0.1 IU mL−1 FSH, and 0.0063 IU mL−1 LH. Denuded oocytes with a detectable first polar body were inseminated with 2 × 106 cells mL−1 cauda epididymal spermatozoa for 22 h in TALP solution. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in modified SOF medium at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. For slow freezing, oocytes were equilibrated for 20 min at ambient temperatures in PBS with 20% FCS containing either 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) + 0.2 M sucrose or 1.5 M EG + 0.2 M trehalose. Oocytes were loaded into 0.25-mL straws, cooled to −7°C at 2°C min, held for 5 min, seeded, cooled down to −30°C at 0.3°C min, and finally plunged into liquid nitrogen. The straws were thawed for 5 s at room temperature and for 30 s in a waterbath at 30°C. Oocytes were washed 3 times before insemination. In vitro-matured oocytes were exposed to the cryoprotective media for 30 min before they were inseminated and then they were cultured for 7 days. For vitrification (Hochi et al. 2004 Theriogenology 61, 267–275), a minimum-volume cooling procedure using Cryotop (Kitazato Supply Co., Tokyo, Japan) as a cryodevice was applied. No blastocysts could be obtained after slow freezing with a cryoprotective medium containing 0.2 M sucrose. Simple exposure to the same freezing medium after in vitro maturation without cryopreservation resulted in a blastocyst rate of 7.9% (control oocytes, 10.7%; not significant (NS); chi-square analysis). Use of trehalose as an extracellular cryoprotectant resulted in the harvest of one blastocyst (0.6%) after slow freezing. Exposure to the same cryoprotective medium resulted in a blastocyst rate of 10.0% (fresh control, 10.9%; NS). After exposure of in vitro-matured oocytes to the vitrification solution, a blastocyst rate of 16.0% was observed (8/50), which was not statistically different from the blastocyst rate in fresh control oocytes (16.3%; 15/92). No blastocysts could be obtained after vitrification (0/64). The results (Table 1) demonstrate that there is no obvious toxic effect of the cryoprotectants employed here for slow freezing or vitrification on the in vitro-matured oocytes, but the developmental potential of cryopreserved oocytes to the blastocyst stage is severely impaired.