83 VITRIFICATION OF IMMATURE AND IN VITRO-MATURED HORSE OOCYTES
L. Bogliolo A , F. Ariu A , I. Rosati A , M. T. Zedda A , S. Pau A , S. Naitana B , G. Leoni B , M. Kuwayama C and S. Ledda BA Obstetrics Section of the Institute of General Pathology, Pathological Anatomy and Veterinary Obstetrics-Surgery Clinic, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
B Department of Animal Biology, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
C Kato Ladies' Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(2) 149-150 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv18n2Ab83
Published: 14 December 2005
Abstract
Few attempts have been carried out to cryopreserve equine oocytes, and an effective cryopreservation protocol is not defined yet. Studies were conducted to compare the viability of immature and in vitro-matured horse oocytes vitrified by the minimal volume cooling (MVC) cryotop vitrification method (Kuwayama et al. 2005 Reprod. BioMed. Online 11, 300–308). Oocytes were recovered from slaughterhouse ovaries and divided, on the basis of the morphology of cumulus cells, into cumulus-expanded (CE) and cumulus-compacted (CC) oocytes. Groups of CC and CE oocytes were vitrified immediately after recovery [germinal vesicle (GV) stage] or matured in vitro (IVM) and cryopreserved at the MII stage as follows: oocytes were incubated 30 min in TCM-199 + 20% FCS + 10% ethylene glycol (EG) + 10% DMSO, followed by 20 min in TCM-199 + 20% FCS + 20% EG + 20% DMSO + 0.25 M sucrose, loaded in cryotops (2 µL), and plunged into liquid nitrogen. Warming was performed at 38.5°C by washing the oocytes in TCM-199 + 20% FCS with decreasing sucrose concentrations (1.25 M, 0.62 M, 0.31 M). After warming oocytes cryopreserved at the GV stage were matured in vitro for 24 h (CE) or 36 h (CC) in TCM-199 + 10% FCS + FSH, LH each at (0.1 UI/mL) + cysteamine, fixed, and stained with glycerol-Hoechst 33342 to assess nuclear maturation. Oocytes vitrified at the MII stage were in vitro cultured for 2 h to evaluate their morphological survival on the basis of the presence of an intact zona pellucida and membrane. Nonvitrified oocytes undergoing the same maturation protocol were used as controls. Results (Table 1) indicated that the survival rate of oocytes vitrified at the GV stage, after IVM, was similar between CE and CC oocytes (43.6% vs 42.6%). Significantly (P < 0.01) higher numbers of vitrified CE MII oocytes (52.9%) survived, compared to CC (34.8%), after 2-h culture. The percentages of viable MII oocytes from CE and CC GV vitrified oocytes were 43.6% and 40.9% respectively and were comparable to those from vitrified MII oocytes (CE, 52.9%; CC, 34.8%) and control oocytes (CE, 56.4%; CC, 53.3%). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that vitrification by the MCV Cryotop method of horse oocytes at either the GV or the MII stage allows a similar number of viable mature oocytes to be recovered.