190 EFFECT OF THE PROPERTIES OF CERVICAL MUCUS ON PREGNANCY RATES IN HOLSTEIN HEIFERS AND COWS AFTER EMBRYO TRANSFER
T. Maekawa A , S. Morita A , O. Douchi A and H. Koyama ADepartment of Dairy Science, Rakuno Gakuenn University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(2) 203-203 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv18n2Ab190
Published: 14 December 2005
Abstract
Selection of animals as recipients of embryo transfer is an important procedure of embryo transfer on farms. Most animals are evaluated for their acceptability as recipients based on the quality of their corpus leteum (CL). However, since rectal palpation is a subjective evaluation method, a more objective method of assessing the suitability of the recipient is required. Cervical mucus may be able to be used to evaluate the condition of the uterus indirectly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the properties of cervical mucus and pregnancy rates after embryo transfer in Holstein heifers and cows. Cervical mucus was collected using a swab off the ostium uteri externum and was stained with 5% Giemsa's solution for 20 min one day before embryo transfer. The stained cervical mucus were classified based on the type of staining pattern (Kitamura et al. 2003 Theriogenology 59, 307) into five groups: filiaceous (Type 1), taenia (Type 2), claustral (Type 3), nubecula (Type 4), or aqueous (Type 5). Proportions of the types of cervical mucus and pregnancy rates were analyzed by chi-square test. In Experiment 1, 113 heifers and 266 cows were examined for cervical mucus type. No significant difference was observed in the proportions of the types of cervical mucus between heifers and cows (heifers: 35.4%, 18.6%, 16.8%, 25.7%, and 3.5%; cows: 24.4%, 14.3%, 20.3%, 30.8%, and 10.2% for Types 1∼5, respectively). In Experiment 2, either a fresh or frozen-thawed embryo was implanted in vivo in 84 heifers and 163 cows 7 days after estrus. The heifers and cows were judged to have normal sized CLs (normal, 17 mm or more) and have no vaginal abnormalities such as cervical mucus contaminated with pus and urovagina as per vaginal examination. The proportions of acceptable Type 5 recipients was lower than that of Type 1 (P < 0.05). The pregnancy rates were 47.6% for heifers and 45.4% for cows (Table 1). The pregnancy rates of Types 1–3 (53.5%) were significantly higher than for Types 4 and 5 (29.9%) in the cows (P < 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference, the same tendency was observed in the heifers. Pregnancy was unsuccessful in Type 5 recipients, both heifers and cows. The total pregnancy rates of Types 1–3 were significantly higher than for Types 4 and 5 (53.5% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.001). These results suggest that cervical mucus type can serve as an objective selection criterion for embryo recipients. Further, embryo transfer should be avoided in Type 5 recipients.