State of the art in farm animal sperm evaluation
Heriberto Rodríguez-MartínezDivision of Comparative Reproduction, Obstetrics and Udder Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ullsväg 14C, Clinical Centre, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: heriberto.rodriguez@kv.slu.se
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(1) 91-101 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06104
Published: 12 December 2006
Abstract
Our ability to screen the structural and functional integrity of the spermatozoon in vitro has increased markedly over the past decades, but our capacity to estimate the fertility of a semen sample or of the sire from which it has been collected, especially in selected farm animal breeders, has not. The estimation of fertility is constrained by several factors (e.g. type of cell, analysis strength, sperm deposition strategies, recordings of fertility), including the fact that the ejaculate is composed of a diverse sperm population. Such cell heterogeneity is reflected not only in differences in the intactness of attributes needed for fertilisation, such as motility or morphology, but also in the relative ability of the spermatozoa to remain fertile over time, to sustain selection steps and responses to exogenous stimuli similar to those during sperm transport in the female genital tract, all of which account for innate variations in the fertilising ability among doses, ejaculates and sires. Determination of how large such a sperm population with competence for fertilisation and in-built ability to display these attributes under physiological signalling is would allow for a better estimation of fertility, provided that the particular sire produces this sub-population in a repeatable manner. The value of these analyses is discussed in the present paper.
Extra keywords: fertilising ability, fertility estimation, semen analysis.
Acknowledgments
The author’s studies reported herein have been made possible by grants from FORMAS, formerly the Swedish Council for Research in Forestry and Agriculture (SJFR), and the Swedish Farmer’s Foundation for Agricultural Research (SLF), Stockholm, Sweden.
Abaigar, T. , Holt, W. V. , Harrison, R. A. , and Del Barrio, G. (1999). Sperm subpopulations in boar (Sus scrofa) and gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) semen as revealed by pattern analysis of computer-assisted motility assessments. Biol. Reprod. 60, 32–41.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Evenson, D. P. , and Wixon, R. (2006). Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology 65, 979–991.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (2003). Laboratory semen assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reprod. Domest. Anim. 38, 312–318.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Saacke, R. G. , Dalton, J. , Nadir, S. , Nebel, R. L. , and Bame, J. (2000). Relationship of seminal traits and insemination time to fertilisation rate and embryo quality. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60–61, 663–677.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Samardzija, M. , Karadjole, M. , Matkovic, M. , Cergolj, M. , and Getz, I. , et al. (2006). A comparison of BoviPure and Percoll on bull sperm separation protocols for IVF. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 91, 237–247.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Satake, N. , Elliot, R. M. , Watson, P. F. , and Holt, W. V. (2006). Sperm selection and competition in pigs may be mediated by the differential motility activation and suppression of sperm subpopulations within the oviduct. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 1560–1572.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Schuster, T. G. , Cho, B. , Keller, L. M. , Takayama, S. , and Smith, G. D. (2003). Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics. Reprod. Biomed. Online 7, 75–81.
| PubMed |
Sellés, E. , Gadea, J. , Romar, R. , Matas, C. , and Ruiz, S. (2003). Analysis of in vitro fertilizing capacity to evaluate the freezing procedures of boar semen and to predict the subsequent fertility. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 38, 66–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Shamsuddin, M. , and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (1994). A simple, non-traumatic swim-up method for the selection of spermatozoa for in vitro fertilisation in the bovine. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 36, 61–75.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Silva, P. F. N. , and Gadella, B. M. (2006). Detection of damage in mammalian sperm cells. Theriogenology 65, 958–978.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Smital, J. , Wolf, J. , and De Souza, L. L. (2005). Estimation of genetic parameters of semen characteristics and reproductive traits in AI boars. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 86, 119–130.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Somfai, T. , Bodo, S. , Nagy, S. , Pap, A. B. , Ivancsics, J. , Baranyai, B. , Gocza, E. , and Kovacs, A. (2002). Effect of swim up and Percoll treatment on viability and acrosome integrity of frozen–thawed bull spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 37, 285–290.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Stähr, B. , Berg, C. , Bechtold, B. , and Müller, K. (2000). Relations between the amount of in-vitro-capacitated sperm cells after liquid-preservation and the fertility of AI-boars. Proc. 14th ICAR, Stockholm 2, 152.
Stålhammar, E. M. , Janson, L. , and Philipsson, J. (1994). The impact of sperm motility on non-return rate in preselected dairy bulls. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 34, 37–45.
| PubMed |
Suh, R. S. , Phadke, N. , Ohl, D. A. , Takayama, S. , and Smith, G. D. (2003). Rethinking gamete/embryo isolation and culture with microfluidics. Hum. Reprod. Update 9, 451–461.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Suh, R. S. , Zhu, X. , Phadke, N. , Ohl, D. A. , Takayama, S. , and Smith, G. D. (2006). IVF within microfluidic channels requires total numbers and lower concentrations of sperm. Hum. Reprod. 21, 477–483.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Sutkeviciene, N. , Andersson, M. A. , Zilinskas, H. , and Andersson, M. (2005). Assessment of boar semen quality in retaion to fertility with special reference to methanol stress. Theriogenology 63, 739–747.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Tanghe, S. , Van Soom, A. , Sterckx, V. , Maes, D. , and de Kruif, A. (2002). Assessment of different sperm quality parameters to predict in vitro fertility of bulls. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 37, 127–132.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Tardif, S. , Laforest, J. P. , Cormier, N. , and Bailey, J. L. (1999). The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. Theriogenology 52, 447–459.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Tartaglione, C. M. , and Ritta, M. N. (2004). Prognostic value of spermatological parameters as predictors of in vitro fertility of frozen–thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 62, 1245–1252.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Thundathil, J. , Gil, J. , Januskauskas, A. , Larsson, B. , Söderquist, L. , Mapletoft, R. , and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (1999). Relationship between the proportion of capacitated spermatozoa present in frozen–thawed semen and fertility with artificial insemination. Int. J. Androl. 22, 366–373.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Tienthai, P. , Kjellén, L. , Pertoft, H. , Suzuki, K. , and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (2000). Localisation and quantitation of hyaluronan and sulphated glycosaminoglycans in the tissues and intraluminal fluid of the pig oviduct. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 12, 173–182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Waberski, D. , Magnus, F. , Ardon, F. , Petrunkina, A. M. , Weitze, K. F. , and Topfer-Petersen, E. (2006). Binding of boar spermatozoa to oviductal epithelium in vitro in relation to sperm morphology and storage time. Reproduction 131, 311–318.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Weitze, K. F. , Rabeler, J. , Willmen, T. , and Waberski, D. (1990). Interaction between inseminate, uterine and ovarian function in the sow. I. Influence of seminal plasma and estrogens in the inseminate on intragenital transport, time of ovulation and fertility in gilts. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 25, 191–196.
Zhang, B. R. , Larsson, B. , Lundeheim, N. , and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (1997). Relation between embryo development in vitro and 56-day non-return rates of frozen–thawed semen from dairy AI bulls. Theriogenology 48, 221–231.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Zhang, B. R. , Larsson, B. , Lundeheim, N. , and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (1998). Sperm characteristics and zona pellucida binding in relation to field fertility of frozen–thawed semen from dairy AI bulls. Int. J. Androl. 21, 207–216.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Zhang, B. R. , Larsson, B. , Lundeheim, N. , Håård, M. G. M. , and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (1999). Prediction of bull fertility by combined in vitro assessments of frozen–thawed semen from young dairy bulls entering an AI-program. Int. J. Androl. 22, 253–260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |