Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similarities between female meadow voles mating during post-partum oestrus and raising two concurrent litters and females raising only one litter

Javier delBarco-Trillo A B C and Michael H. Ferkin A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biology, University of Memphis, Ellington Hall, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

B Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: jtrillo@memphis.edu

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(7) 751-756 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06004
Submitted: 21 January 2006  Accepted: 21 May 2006   Published: 18 August 2006

Abstract

In many species of small mammals, females undergo post-partum oestrus soon after delivering a litter, becoming pregnant while suckling the previous litter. Females raising two concurrent litters need to allocate many more resources to reproduction than females raising only one litter. Consequently, there may be differences between litters raised concurrently or singly. We investigated this issue in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, a species in which most females in the wild reproduce during post-partum oestrus. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that the development of pups in two concurrent litters differs from that of pups in a single litter. To test this hypothesis, we measured the following variables for concurrent and singly reared litters: gestation length; litter size; sex ratio; bodyweight of males and females at different ages; total litter weight at weaning; growth rates; and intra-litter variation in body mass. Except for bodyweight of males at 60 days of age, which was higher in the first of the concurrent litters, none of the variables differed among the litters. These results indicate that females are able to adjust to differing loads of maternal care to provide equivalent resources to concurrent litters and singly reared litters.


Acknowledgments

We thank Steve Schoech and Andrew Pierce for comments on final versions of the manuscript. This work was supported by a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research to J.d.-T., NSF Grant IOB 04553 and NIH Grant MH 049525 to M.H.F. This research adhered to the Animal Behaviour Society Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research. All animal procedures were approved by the IACUC of the University of Memphis.


References

Bacon, S. J. , and McClintock, M. K. (1994). Multiple factors determine the sex ratio of postpartum-conceived Norway rat litters. Physiol. Behav. 56, 359–366.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Galef B. G.,Jr 1983 Costs and benefits of mammalian reproduction. In ‘Symbiosis in Parent–Offspring Interactions’. (Eds A. Rosenblum and H. Moltz.) pp. 249–278. (Plenum Press: New York, USA.)

Gilbert, A. N. (1984). Postpartum and lactational estrus: a comparative analysis in Rodentia. J. Comp. Psychol. 98, 232–245.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Trivers R. L. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In ‘Sexual Selection and the Descendent of Man: 1871–1971’. (Ed. B. Campbell.) pp. 136–179. (Aldine: Chicago, IL, USA.)

Woodside, B. , Wilson, R. , Chee, P. , and Leon, M. (1981). Resource partitioning during reproduction in the Norway rat. Science 211, 76–77.
PubMed |

Woodside, B. , Cohen, L. R. , and Jans, J. E. (1987). Effects of food restriction during concurrent lactation and pregnancy in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 40, 613–615.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |