Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Embryo development and embryo transfer in the European mink (Mustela lutreola), an endangered mustelid species

S. Amstislavsky A B D , E. Kizilova A , Y. Ternovskaya C , G. Zudova C , H. Lindeberg B , J. Aalto B and M. Valtonen B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Division, 630090, prosp. Lavrentjeva 10, Novosibirsk, Russia.

B Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland.

C Institute of Zootaxy and Ecology of Animals, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Division, 630091, Frunze str., 11, Novosibirsk, Russia.

D Corresponding author. Email: amstis@bionet.nsc.ru

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(4) 459-467 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD05135
Submitted: 10 October 2005  Accepted: 1 January 2006   Published: 4 April 2006

Abstract

The European mink is an endangered Mustelidae species and thus requires effective conservation measures, although little is known about reproduction in this species. In particular, preimplantation development has not been studied and, therefore, embryonic development and the growth of embryos was documented in the present study for European mink using light and fluorescent microscopy. Embryos develop in the oviducts and then migrate into the uterus on Day 6 post coitum (p.c.) at the morula stage. Embryos expanded as blastocysts from Day 7 until implantation on Day 12 p.c. Based on these findings, the use of embryo transfer for a conservation programme for the European mink was evaluated. Embryos were flushed from European mink resource females and transferred into the uterine horns of recipient hybrid females (honoriks and nohoriks). These hybrids were obtained by mating European polecat males with European mink females and vice versa. A total of 40 embryos was transferred and 20 live kits were born. The rates of pre- and postnatal survival were 50% and 70%, respectively. Both male and female offspring were lighter at birth in the embryo transfer group compared with naturally born controls, but there was no difference at 3 months of age.

Extra keywords: interspecies barrier, reproductive technologies, species ex situ conservation.


Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Finnish Academy (grant no. 201702). The authors thank Nikolai Martinov for taking care of the animals on the farm during the study and Valery Cindrenko and Ewen MacDonald for the help with the preparation of this manuscript. The authors thank the collective microscopy centre of the Siberian Department of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the use of microscopes.


References

Adams C. E. (1982). Egg transfer in carnivores and rodents between species and to ectopic sites. In ‘Mammalian Egg Transfer’. (Ed. C. E. Adams.) pp. 49–61. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)

Allen W., Kydd J., and Antczak D. (1993). Interspecies and extraspecies equine pregnancies. In ‘Equine Reproduction’. (Eds A. O. McKinnon and J. L. Voss.) pp. 536–553. (Lea and Febiger: London, UK.)

Amstislavsky, S. (2006). [Interspecies transfer of embryos and cell nuclei as an approach for endangered species conservation]. Ontogenez (Russian J. Dev.) 37, 1–9.[In Russian]
Conference on the Conservation of the European Mink (2003). ‘Conclusions of the Workshops of the Conference on the Conservation of the European Mink. Logroño, La Rioja (Spain), 5–8 November 2003.’ Available at http://www.lutreola.ee/english/conf_concl_eng.htm [Verified 8 March 2006].

Davison A., Birks J. D. S., Maran T., Macdonald D. W., Sidorovich V. E., and Griffiths H. I. (2000). Conservation implications of hybridisation between polecats, ferrets and European mink (Mustela spp.). In ‘Mustelids in a Modern World. Management and Conservation Aspects of Small Carnivore: Human Interactions’. (Ed. H. I. Griffiths.) pp. 153–162. (Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, Germany.)

Enders, A. C. , and Schlafke, S. (1972). Implantation in the ferret: epithelial penetration. Am. J. Anat. 133, 291–315.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | King C. M. (1990) Stoat. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 288–312. (Oxford University Press: Auckland, New Zealand.)

Li, Z. , Jiang, Q. , Zhang, Y. , Liu, X. , and Engelhardt, J. (2001). Successful production of offspring after superovulation and in vitro culture of embryos from domestic ferrets (Mustela putorius furos). Reproduction 122, 611–618.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Lindeberg H. (2003). Embryo technology in the farmed European polecat (Mustela putorius). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.

Lindeberg, H. , and Järvinen, M. (2003). Early embryonic development and in vitro culture of in vivo produced embryos in the farmed European polecat (Mustela putorius). Theriogenology 60, 965–975.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Sidorovich V. (2000). The on-going decline of riparian mustelids (European mink, Mustela lutreola, polecat, Mustela putorius, and stoat, Mustela erminea) in eastern Europe: a review of the results to date and an hypothesis. In ‘Mustelids in a Modern World. Management and Conservation Aspects of Small Carnivore: Human Interactions’. (Ed. H. I. Griffiths.) pp. 295–319. (Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, Germany.)

Ternovsky D. V., and Ternovskaya Y. G. (1994). ‘[Ecology of Mustelids].’ (Nauka (Scientific Siberian Press): Novosibirsk, Russia.) [In Russian]

Valtonen, M. , King, W. , Gustavson, I. , and Mäkinen, A. (1985). Embryonic development in the blue fox. Nord. Veterinärmed. 37, 243–248.


Wildt, D. , Monfort, S. , Donoghue, A. , Johnston, L. , and Howard, J. (1992). Embryogenesis in conservation biology: or, how to make an endangered species embryo. Theriogenology 37, 161–184.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhelezova, A. I. , and Golubitza, A. N. (1978). [Transfer of blastocysts in the mink]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR 238, 462–465.[In Russian]