Meiosis and embryo technology: renaissance of the nucleolus
Poul Maddox-Hyttel A C , Bolette Bjerregaard A and Jozef Laurincik BA Department of Animal and Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Groennegaardsvej 7, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
B Constantin the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovak Republic.
C Corresponding author. Email: poh@kvl.dk
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17(2) 3-14 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD04108
Submitted: 1 August 2004 Accepted: 1 October 2004 Published: 1 January 2005
Abstract
The nucleolus is the site of rRNA and ribosome production. This organelle presents an active fibrillogranular ultrastructure in the oocyte during the growth of the gamete but, at the end of the growth phase, the nucleolus is transformed into an inactive remnant that is dissolved when meiosis is resumed at germinal vesicle breakdown. Upon meiosis, structures resembling the nucleolar remnant, now referred to as nucleolus precursor bodies (NPBs), are established in the pronuclei. These entities harbour the development of fibrillogranular nucleoli and re-establishment of nucleolar function in conjunction with the major activation of the embryonic genome. This so-called nucleologenesis occurs at a species-specific time of development and can be classified into two different models: one where nucleolus development occurs inside the NPBs (e.g. cattle) and one where the nucleolus is formed on the surface of the NPBs (e.g. pigs). A panel of nucleolar proteins with functions during rDNA transcription (topoisomerase I, RNA polymerase I and upstream binding factor) and early (fibrillarin) or late rRNA processing (nucleolin and nucleophosmin) are localised to specific compartments of the oocyte nucleolus and those engaged in late processing are, to some degree, re-used for nucleologenesis in the embryo, whereas the others require de novo embryonic transcription in order to be allocated to the developing nucleolus. In the oocyte, inactivation of the nucleolus coincides with the acquisition of full meiotic competence, a parameter that may be of importance in relation to in vitro oocyte maturation. In embryo, nucleologenesis may be affected by technological manipulations: in vitro embryo production apparently has no impact on this process in cattle, whereas in the pig this technology results in impaired nucleologenesis. In cattle, reconstruction of embryos by nuclear transfer results in profound disturbances in nucleologenesis. In conclusion, the nucleolus is an organelle of great importance for the developmental competence of oocytes and embryos and may serve as a morphological marker for the completion of oocyte growth and normality of activation of the embryonic genome.
Extra keywords: cattle, fertilisation, oocyte, pig, transcription.
Assey, R. J. , Hyttel, P. , Greve, T. , and Purwantara, B. (1994). Oocyte morphology in dominant and subordinate follicles. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 37, 335–344.
| PubMed |
Camous, S. , Kopecny, V. , and Fléchon, J.-E. (1986). Autoradiographic detection of the earliest stage of 3H-uridine incorporation into the cow embryo. Biol. Cell 58, 195–200.
| PubMed |
Gautier, T. , Robert-Nicoud, M. , Guilly, M. N. , and Hernandez-Verdun, D. (1992). Relocation of nucleolar proteins around chromosomes at mitosis. A study by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 102, 729–737.
| PubMed |
Verheggen, C. , Le Panse, S. , Almouzni, G. , and Hernandez-Verdun, D. (1998). Presence of pre-rRNAs before activation of polymerase I transcription in the building process of nucleoli during early development of Xenopus laevis. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1167–1180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Viuff, D. , Avery, B. , Greve, T. , King, W. A. , and Hyttel, P. (1996). Transcriptional activity in in vitro produced bovine 2- and 4-cell embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 43, 171–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Voit, R. , and Grummt, I. (2001). Phosphorylation of UBF at serine 388 is required for interaction with RNA polymerase I and activation of rDNA transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13 631–13 636.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Voit, R. , Hoffmann, M. , and Grummt, I. (1999). Phosphorylation by G1-specific cdk–cyclin complexes activates the nucleolar transcription factor UBF. EMBO J. 18, 1891–1899.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Wachtler, F. , and Stahl, A. (1993). The nucleolus: a structural and functional interpretation. Micron 24, 473–505.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wrenzycki, C. , Wells, D. , Herrmann, D. , Miller, A. , Oliver, J. , Tervit, R. , and Niemann, H. (2001). Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biol. Reprod. 65, 309–317.
| PubMed |
Zatsepina, O. , Bouniol-Baly, C. , Amirand, C. , and Debey, P. (2000). Functional and molecular reorganization of the nucleolar apparatus in maturing mouse oocytes. Dev. Biol. 223, 354–370.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Zatsepina, O. , Baly, Ch. , Chebrout, M. , and Debey, P. (2003). The step-wise assembly of a functional nucleolus in preimplantation mouse embryos involves the Cajal (coiled) body. Dev. Biol. 253, 66–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |