Role of the mitochondrial genome in preimplantation development and assisted reproductive technologies
Lawrence C. Smith A B , Jacob Thundathil A and France Filion AA Centre de Recherche en Reproduction Animale (CRRA), Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 7C6, Canada.
B Corresponding author. Email: smithl@medvet.umontreal.ca
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17(2) 15-22 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD04084
Submitted: 1 August 2004 Accepted: 1 October 2004 Published: 1 January 2005
Abstract
Our fascination for mitochondria relates to their origin as symbiotic, semi-independent organisms on which we, as eukaryotic beings, rely nearly exclusively to produce energy for every cell function. Therefore, it is not surprising that these organelles play an essential role in many events during early development and in artificial reproductive technologies (ARTs) applied to humans and domestic animals. However, much needs to be learned about the interactions between the nucleus and the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA), particularly with respect to the control of transcription, replication and segregation during preimplantation. Nuclear-encoded factors that control transcription and replication are expressed during preimplantation development in mice and are followed by mtDNA transcription, but these result in no change in mtDNA copy number. However, in cattle, mtDNA copy number increases during blastocyst expansion and hatching. Nuclear genes influence the mtDNA segregation patterns in heteroplasmic animals. Because many ARTs markedly modify the mtDNA content in embryos, it is essential that their application is preceded by careful experimental scrutiny, using suitable animal models.
Abdel-Azim, G. , and Freeman, A. E. (2002). Superiority of QTL-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 1869–1880.
| PubMed |
Upholt, W. B. , and Dawid, I. B. (1977). Mapping of mitochondrial DNA of individual sheep and goats: rapid evolution in the D loop region. Cell 11, 571–583.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |