Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Commissioning for health and community sector reform: perspectives on change from Victoria

Kate Silburn A and Virginia Lewis A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: v.lewis@latrobe.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 26(4) 332-337 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY20011
Submitted: 19 January 2020  Accepted: 9 May 2020   Published:

Journal Compilation © La Trobe University 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC

Abstract

Commissioning health and community services is a complex task involving planning, purchasing and monitoring services for a population. It is particularly difficult when attempting system-level reform, and many barriers to effective commissioning have been documented. In Victoria, the state government has operated as a commissioner of many services, including mental health community support and alcohol and other drug treatment services. This study investigated the perceived consequences of a reform process in these two sectors after recommissioning was used as a mechanism to achieve sector-wide redesign. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 senior staff from community health, mental health and drug and alcohol services 6 months after implementation. The process was affected by restructuring in the commissioning department resulting in truncation of preparatory planning and technical work required for system design. Consequently, reform implementation was reportedly chaotic, costly to agencies and staff, and resulted in disillusionment of enthusiastic reform supporters. Negative service system impacts were produced, such as disruption of collaborative and/or comprehensive models of care and strategies for reaching marginalised groups. Without careful planning and development commissioning processes can become over-reliant on competitive tendering to produce results, create significant costs to service providers and engender system-level issues with the potential to disrupt innovative models focused on meeting client needs.

Additional keywords: commissioning health care, drug and alcohol, mental health.


References

Addicott R (2014) ‘Commissioning and contracting for integrated care.’ (The King’s Fund, London, UK)

Berends L, Ritter A (2014) The processes of reform in Victoria’s alcohol and other drug sector, 2011–2014. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Checkland K, Harrison S, Snow S, McDermott I, Coleman A (2012) Commissioning in the English National Health Service: what’s the problem? Journal of Social Policy 41, 533–550.
Commissioning in the English National Health Service: what’s the problem?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Department of Health (2012) Psychiatric disability rehabilitation and support services reform framework consultation paper. Department of Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

Department of Health (2013a) New directions for alcohol and drug treatment services: a framework for reform. (Department of Health: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/publications/researchandreports/New-directions-for-alcohol-and-drug-treatment-services-A-framework-for-reform [Verified 9 June 2020]

Department of Health (2013b) Reforming community support services for people with a mental illness: reform framework for psychiatric disability rehabilitation and support services. Department of Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

Gardner K, Davies GP, Edwards K, McDonald J, Findlay T, Kearns R, Joshi C, Harris M (2016) A rapid review of the impact of commissioning on service use, quality, outcomes and value for money: implications for Australian policy. Australian Journal of Primary Health 22, 40–49.
A rapid review of the impact of commissioning on service use, quality, outcomes and value for money: implications for Australian policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27469052PubMed |

Shergold P (2013) Service sector reform. A roadmap for community and human services reform. Disability Advocacy Research Unit, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. Available at http://www.daru.org.au/resource/service-sector-reform-project-a-roadmap-for-community-and-human-services-reform [Verified 9 June 2020]

Victorian Auditor-General (2011) Managing drug and alcohol prevention and treatment services. (Victorian Government Printer, Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/papers/govpub/VPARL2010-14No14.pdf [Verified 29 May 2020]

World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) The world health report 2008: primary health care now more than ever. (WHO: Geneva, Switzerland)