Pharmacists in general practice: recommendations resulting from team-based collaborative care
Helen Benson A C , Cherie Lucas A , Shalom I. Benrimoj A , Walter Kmet B and Kylie A. Williams A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Building 7, 67 Thomas Street, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
B WentWest, Western Sydney Primary Health Network, Level 1, 85 Flushcombe Road, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: helen.benson@uts.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 24(6) 448-454 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY18022
Submitted: 30 January 2018 Accepted: 19 July 2018 Published: 2 November 2018
Abstract
The Western Sydney Primary Health Network (PHN), WentWest, has been working to improve patient and health system outcomes by commissioning projects that enhance patient-focussed, team-based care. One such project is the WentWest General Practice Pharmacist Project, involving the integration of pharmacists within general practice sites. The aim of this study is to describe, classify and analyse recommendations made by pharmacists to GPs, resulting from patient consultations between pharmacists and patients in a general practice setting. This study was a multi-centre prospective observational study (April 2017–September 2017) investigating recommendations made by pharmacists integrated in a general practice setting. Thirteen general practice sites located in Western Sydney, NSW, Australia were involved in the study. The main outcome measures of this study include the classification of pharmacist recommendations and the percentage of those recommendations accepted by GPs. The pharmacists recorded the results from 618 patient consultations. These consultations resulted in 1601 recommendations of which 1404 (88%) were recorded as accepted. This study demonstrated that the recommendations made by pharmacists in general practice are well accepted by GPs and may lead to improvements in medication management and patient care.
Additional keywords: drug-related problems, integrated care, medication review, primary care.
References
Australian Government Treasury (2010) Intergenerational Report 2010. Australia to 2050: Future Challenges. (Australian Government Treasury: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at: https://treasury.gov.au/publication/2015-intergenerational-report/ [Verified 24 October 2017]Benson H, Sabater-Hernández D, Benrimoj SI, Williams KA (2018) Piloting the integration of non-dispensing pharmacists in the Australian general practice setting: a process evaluation. International Journal of Integrated Care 18, 4
| Piloting the integration of non-dispensing pharmacists in the Australian general practice setting: a process evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berdine HJ, Skomo ML (2012) Development and integration of pharmacist clinical services into the patient-centered medical home. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association: JAPhA. 52, 661–667.
| Development and integration of pharmacist clinical services into the patient-centered medical home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Britt HC, Miller G, Knox S (2008) Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia 189, 72–77.
Caughey GE, Kalisch Ellett LM, Goldstein S, Roughead EE (2015) Suboptimal medication-related quality of care preceding hospitalisation of older patients. The Medical Journal of Australia 203, 220–227.
| Suboptimal medication-related quality of care preceding hospitalisation of older patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Farrell B, Pottie K, Haydt S, Kennie N, Sellors C, Dolovich L (2008) Integrating into family practice: the experiences of pharmacists in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 16, 309–315.
| Integrating into family practice: the experiences of pharmacists in Ontario, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freeman C, Cottrell WN, Kyle G, Williams I, Nissen L (2012) Integrating a pharmacist into the general practice environment: opinions of pharmacist’s, general practitioner’s, health care consumer’s, and practice manager’s. BMC Health Services Research 12, 229
| Integrating a pharmacist into the general practice environment: opinions of pharmacist’s, general practitioner’s, health care consumer’s, and practice manager’s.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freeman CR, Cottrell WN, Kyle G, Williams ID, Nissen L (2013) An evaluation of medication review reports across different settings. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 35, 5–13.
| An evaluation of medication review reports across different settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Geurts MM, Talsma J, Brouwers JR, de Gier JJ (2012) Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 74, 16–33.
| Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gheewala PA, Peterson GM, Curtain CM, Nishtala PS, Hannan PJ, Castelino RL (2014) Impact of the pharmacist medication review services on drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared medications in residents of aged care facilities. Drugs & Aging 31, 825–835.
| Impact of the pharmacist medication review services on drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared medications in residents of aged care facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gnjidic D, Hilmer SN, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Waite L, Seibel MJ, McLachlan AJ, Cumming RG, Handelsman DJ, Le Couteur DG (2012) Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65, 989–995.
| Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Howard R, Rodgers S, Avery AJ, Sheikh A (2014) Description and process evaluation of pharmacists’ interventions in a pharmacist-led information technology-enabled multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial for reducing medication errors in general practice (PINCER trial). International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 22, 59–68.
| Description and process evaluation of pharmacists’ interventions in a pharmacist-led information technology-enabled multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial for reducing medication errors in general practice (PINCER trial).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jorgenson D, Laubscher T, Lyons B, Palmer R (2014) Integrating pharmacists into primary care teams: barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 22, 292–299.
| Integrating pharmacists into primary care teams: barriers and facilitators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kwint HFA, Gussekloo J, Bouvy M (2011) Effects of medication review on drug-related problems in patients using automated drug-dispensing systems. A pragmatic randomized controlled study. Drugs & Aging 28, 305–314.
| Effects of medication review on drug-related problems in patients using automated drug-dispensing systems. A pragmatic randomized controlled study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lenander C, Elfsson B, Danielsson B, Midlöv P, Hasselström J (2014) Effects of a pharmacist-led structured medication review in primary care on drug-related problems and hospital admission rates: a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 32, 180–186.
| Effects of a pharmacist-led structured medication review in primary care on drug-related problems and hospital admission rates: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NHS England (2016) General Practice Forward View. (NHS England: England, UK) Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf [Verified 18 April 2018]
Roughead EE, Semple SJ, Rosenfeld E (2016) The extent of medication errors and adverse drug reactions throughout the patient journey in acute care in Australia. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 14, 113–122.
| The extent of medication errors and adverse drug reactions throughout the patient journey in acute care in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tan ECK, Stewart K, Elliott RA, George J (2013) Stakeholder experiences with general practice pharmacist services: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 3, e003214
| Stakeholder experiences with general practice pharmacist services: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tan ECK, Stewart K, Elliott RA, George J (2014a) Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: the Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS). Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy 10, 623–632.
| Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: the Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tan ECK, Stewart K, Elliott RA, George J (2014b) Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy 10, 608–622.
| Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams M, Peterson GM, Tenni PC, Bindoff IK, Stafford AC (2012) DOCUMENT: a system for classifying drug-related problems in community pharmacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 34, 43–52.
| DOCUMENT: a system for classifying drug-related problems in community pharmacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (2017) ATC/DDD Index 2017. (World Health Organization: Oslo, Norway) Available at: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/2017 [Verified 5 October 2017]
